Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care interim inspection

Children's Home run by SureCare Residential Ltd in Hertfordshire

Inspected 21 Feb 2017 · published 10 Mar 2017 · URN SC470645

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Rosie Davie

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Feb 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Rosie Davie

  • Postcode verified

    CM23 3SP

  • URN verified

    SC470645

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositiveimprovedeffectiveengagingconsistentlycaringsafe
Criticismfailuredeclinedharmat riskseriousinconsistentlackstruggle

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1150w+4
  • What needs to improve512w−37

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,661
longer than usual (typical 904)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home was judged as good at the full inspection. At this interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has declined in effectiveness .

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

The registered manager has left the home. A new manager has been appointed and has been in post for approximately three weeks.

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

Before leaving, the registered manager did meet two of three regulations made at the last inspection. For example, the approach to ensuring that return to home interviews occur following episodes of missing has improved. However, one regulation in relation to helping the children to develop an understanding of what is acceptable behaviour is repeated.

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

Since the last inspection, four of the children have moved on. Their onward destinations vary. For example, one placement was ended by the provider, and another child returned to live with their family. Four new children have come to live in the home. Most have lived in other social care settings. They also have complex social and behavioural histories including exploitation, self-injury and aggression.

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

The children are known to have difficulties in engaging with education. School attendance and motivation to take part in learning varies. For example, one child regularly attends school, and the staff provide transport. On the day of this inspection, another child had gone to the school run by the provider, but this small success follows a lengthy period of refusal. The staff do try to encourage the children to get up and take part in education or home tutoring. However, some of the children will remain in bed for some of the daytime. One child said, ‘Yes, the staff do come and get me up for education, but I ignore them when I feel like it.’ The staff’s ability to engage and motivate the children is inconsistent and varies from child to child.

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

At the point of admission, senior managers write detailed initial impact risk assessments. However, the information from the initial assessments is not used effectively by the staff team to consistently put into practice strategies already identified about how best to help and protect the children. Additionally, risk assessments are not routinely updated after any incidents. This means that all the staff cannot share an understanding of, or know how to approach, situations as they arise with some of the children. The result is that well-meaning staff make mistakes. In some situations, this leads to an escalation in the children’s behaviour and in some cases a failure to safeguard children.

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

In addition to the registered manager leaving, there has been a high turnover of the staff. Some staff have minimal experience relevant to caring for the children with significant emotional and behavioural difficulties. Some of the children stay up through the night. During a recent incident, all of the children barricaded themselves into one of the communal living areas. Later, one of the children, known to be at high risk of exploitation, left the building without the staff’s knowledge. This one example demonstrates that the staff did not have the necessary skills or experience to de-escalate or monitor the situation effectively and therefore keep this group of children safe.

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

During the last recorded fire drill, which took place in the early evening, one child refused to get out of bed. Two other children held the front door to prevent the staff and one child from leaving the home. Records show that the staff did make an effort to speak with two of the children about the impact of their behaviours. However, in the context of the children smoking in the house, this approach does not go far enough to demonstrate that all of the children would know what to do in the event of a fire emergency. This does not ensure that all preventative action is effective.

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

The provider is responsive and very good at liaising with other agencies. The provider usually ensures that notifications are sent to Ofsted, but this inspection identified that on one occasion, when one child had left the home and returned with facial injuries, a formal notification was not made. The incident took place some months ago, and the placing local authority was made aware at the time. This important information may have alerted the regulator more quickly to the issues for this particular child.

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

Incident reports show that sometimes the staff are successful in de-escalating issues when individual children become upset or aggressive. However, the staff say, and some reports show, that recently when more than one child is challenging, other children join in, which means that the children can have a negative impact on one another. There are also times when some of the children do not get on well with one another. The staff say that they intervene when the children are threatening to fight with one another. The approach to behaviour management varies. The staff do try to implement boundaries and identify consequences, but they frequently lack creativity and have little impact. The result is a shortfall in the approach to implementing the behaviour management strategy, because increasingly the staff struggle to manage the dynamic of this group effectively.

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

New staff members have not had the necessary training, as described in the statement of purpose, to help them to fulfil their role. One lone member of staff with minimal time in post took a child in crisis to a hospital. The child is known to be physically and verbally aggressive to adults and is known to abscond. The member of staff was assaulted twice by the child, who absconded from the member of staff. The member of staff appropriately told the manager that she had bitten down on the child’s finger because the child’s finger had been in the staff member’s mouth during the child’s second assault of her. The incident was reported to the placing local authority social work team, but not to the designated officer. Since this inspection, the matter has been correctly reported. However, in addition to highlighting significant shortfalls about staff experience and training, this event represents a failure to implement the safeguarding policy effectively on

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

Physical interventions had increased for a short while, but in the last few months have reduced. The records sampled for physical intervention gave no cause for concern. Missing continues for some of the children, but not all of the children go missing. On the vast majority of occasions, the staff have become better at taking the correct action when they know that a child has left the home or their care. They call the police and report the children missing.

p.4

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

One child spoken to said that the home is fine. Senior leaders are good at dealing with complaints and issues when they are brought to their attention. Overall, the placing local authority social workers offer generous and positive feedback about their experiences of working with the staff. They say that the managers are good at arranging meetings to discuss placement issues and proactive when incidents occur.

p.4

Information about this children’s home

This home is registered to provide care for up to four children who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. It is one of a small group run by an independent provider. A psychologist is avaible to offer direct psychological support to the children. The provider also operates a school. The staff are available to support the children to access this resource.

p.5

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 24/05/2016 Full Good 25/01/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 19/05/2015 Full Requires improvement 23/07/2014 Full Good

p.5

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person(s) meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the positive relationship standard, the registered provider must ensure that children are helped to develop, and to benefit from relationships based on: (b) an understanding about acceptable behaviour (c) positive responses to other children and adults. 28/04/2017

p.6

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the protection of children standard, the registered person must ensure: (2)(i) that staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. This is with specific reference to updating risk assessments effectively. 28/04/2017

p.6

Requirement Due date

12: The protection of children standard*

p.6

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the protection of children standard, the registered provider must ensure that: (2)(b) the home’s day-to-day running is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. 14/03/2017

p.6

Requirement Due date

13: The leadership and management standard

p.6

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the leadership and management standard, (1) the registered person must enable, inspire and lead a culture in relation to the children’s home that: (a) helps children aspire to fulfil their potential; and (b) promotes their welfare. (2) In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to: (a) lead and manage the home in a way that is consistent with 28/04/2017 the approach and ethos and delivers the outcomes, set out in the home’s statement of purpose. (c) ensures that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child.

p.6

Requirement Due date

The registered provider must ensure that the requirements of the Regulatory Reform Act are complied with. (Regulation 25) This is with specific reference to routine and effective fire drills. 28/04/2017

p.7

Requirement Due date

The registered person must implement the safeguarding policy intended to safeguard children accommodated in the home from abuse or neglect. (Regulation 34 (1)(a)) This is with specific reference to liaison with the delegated officer for the local area when there is unusual physical contact between staff and children. 28/04/2017

p.7

Requirement Due date

The registered person must implement the behaviour management policy, which sets out how appropriate behaviour is to be promoted in the home. (Regulation 35 (a)) 28/04/2017

p.7

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation:  Ensure that Ofsted is notified if there is an incident relating to the protection, safeguarding or welfare of a child living in the home which the registered person considers to be serious (40(4)(e)). (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 63, paragraph 14.10)

p.7

What the inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’.

p.8

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children’s home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.8

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for children looked after and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.9

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Information about this inspection

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion