Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

Inspected 31 Jan 2017 · published 7 Mar 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    31 Jan 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alison Cartlidge

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    UB5 6NL

  • Name on report verified

    St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongpositivecaringflourishconfidenteffectivehigh expectationsstrong relationships
Criticismnot sufficientlynot secureinsufficientlynot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings843w+65
  • What needs to improve90w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
921
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Evelyn Ward Headteacher St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School Hartfield Avenue Northolt UB5 6NL

p.1

Short inspection of St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 31 January 2017 with Ofsted Inspector Sarah Jones, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since joining the school in April 2016, you have raised the expectations of teachers, pupils and parents. Together with leaders, you have established a caring community where pupils can flourish. Parents told us that your school is ‘a really great community’ and that ‘teachers are very caring’. The mutual respect between staff and pupils is evident in their strong relationships. The pupils’ positive attitudes towards learning have been sustained from the previous inspection. The school is expanding from two classes per year group to three. Leaders have managed the many changes in staffing well.

p.1

Short inspection of St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

You and your leaders have ensured that the curriculum is broad and balanced, and you utilise specialist teachers effectively in art, music and physical education to strengthen the pupils’ outcomes. Leaders have maintained good provision for the children in the early years, although outdoor activities for Reception children are not sufficiently purposeful and motivating. The progress of the most able pupils is improving well. However, occasionally teachers do not challenge these pupils enough to deepen their knowledge and understanding to maximise their learning.

p.1

Short inspection of St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

You, your leaders and the governors have a clear understanding of what remains to be done. You have established a firm base on which the school is continuing to improve. You check up on the progress of the pupils rigorously, enabling you to focus on the most important next steps. Parents are pleased with the positive improvements made. Teachers are confident and share their good knowledge with pupils, because they have received effective training. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of St Raphael’s Catholic Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. The necessary recruitment checks are carried out to ensure that all adults in school are suitable to work with children. Staff, parents and pupils are positive about the way pupils are kept safe at school. Pupils’ considerate and well-mannered behaviour enables them to support each other academically, emotionally and socially. Pupils have a good awareness of potential dangers in life. For example, children in the Reception Year could talk about taking care not to fall over.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The inspection followed four key lines of enquiry in addition to checking safeguarding arrangements. My colleague and I explored the progress of children in the early years provision, including when working outside. While children do well by the end of the Reception Year, you want to develop their learning through outdoor provision further. You recognise that some of the outdoor activities for children in the Reception do not secure good learning effectively enough.  We found that indoor learning is strong and teachers are particularly successful in promoting vocabulary and phonics to support the children’s language development. Teachers provide children in the Nursery with a wide range of activities that support all areas of learning well.  We checked up on how well the most able pupils learn, especially in reading at key stage 1 and in writing across the school. These were groups of pupils who did less well than they should in national assessments in 2016.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We found that the most able pupils make good progress in reading. Teachers provide pupils with books that are appropriately challenging. Pupils use a wide range of skills, including phonics, to help them tackle unfamiliar texts. They have a good understanding of what they have read.  Pupils’ writing is improving rapidly; they know how to use description to make their work interesting. Occasionally, teachers do not expect enough of the most able pupils so that these pupils can deepen their knowledge and understanding.  We looked at the progress of less-able pupils in reading and mathematics at key stage 2. These pupils did comparatively less well than other pupils in 2016. However, we found that teachers and teaching assistants support less-able pupils well, and that additional resources are made available to help them with their mathematics. As a result, pupils are now making good progress from their

p.2

Inspection findings

starting points.  In reading, less-able pupils are confident and fluent. Good links are made between reading and writing and a strong focus on learning new vocabulary is boosting their progress successfully.  We checked how well leaders have improved the curriculum. At the previous inspection, the curriculum was insufficiently broad and balanced. Displays of work and the pupils’ books provide strong evidence to show that leaders have developed the curriculum well. Teachers ensure tighter links between educational visits and topics studied by pupils, which help to extend learning.

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 outdoor activities for children in the Reception classes are purposeful and motivate children to want to learn  teachers have consistently high expectations of how the most able pupils can deepen their knowledge and understanding in their writing.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Archdiocese of Westminster, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Ealing. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspectors agreed to prioritise the following areas with the school at the start of the inspection:  the progress of children in the early years provision, including when working outside  the challenge for the most able pupils, especially in reading at key stage 1 and in writing across the school  the progress of less-able pupils in reading and mathematics at key stage 2  how leaders have improved the breadth of the curriculum. The inspectors carried out the following activities to explore these areas during the inspection:  observed teaching and learning across the school during learning walks with the headteacher and other senior leaders  met with leaders and members of the governing body  held informal discussions with parents and considered 31 responses to Parent View, 64 questionnaire responses from pupils and 33 from members of staff  considered a range of information supplied by the school, including checks on the

p.3

Information about the inspection

quality of teaching, the school development plan and records relating to attendance and safeguarding procedures  listened to pupils read.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion