Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Spofforth Church of England Controlled Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
7 Feb 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Kate Rowley
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HG3 1BA
- Name on report verified
Spofforth Church of England Controlled Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,043
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Paul Griffiths Headteacher Spofforth Church of England Controlled Primary School School Lane Spofforth Harrogate North Yorkshire HG3 1BA
p.1
School
Following my visit to the school on 7 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in July 2012.
p.1
School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Your vision to develop a culture of learning where pupils develop resilience and are engaged in purposeful activities which put their skills to the test is clear to see. Productivity is high and attitudes to learning are excellent.
p.1
School
Your active engagement and collaboration with other schools, in the federation, the learning partnership and beyond, results in a continuing cycle of improvement, for leaders, staff and, consequently, your pupils. An able and proactive governing body fully support you and ask challenging questions when they need to, to ensure the best outcomes for pupils. They too value the partnerships that exist and use these effectively, constantly seeking to improve their own practice.
p.1
School
Provision for children in the early years has improved since the last inspection. The proportion of children who reach a good level of development by the end of Reception has continued to rise. This year, boys entered school with lower starting points than girls, but are quickly catching up. Adults work effectively together to create purposeful and exciting experiences and children show sustained concentration across different activities. Adults use effective questioning to encourage children to think independently and develop their learning in an environment that is safe. Children are encouraged to explore and try new things. Effective modelling from staff, in role-play areas in particular, helps children develop their skills in turn-taking and working cooperatively, as well as extending their communication skills.
p.1
School
There is a common view among staff, parents and children that school is a very positive place to be. One parent describes it as ‘one big family’, and pupils find it very difficult to think of anything that can be improved! Regular and effective methods of communication exist between home and school so that parents can celebrate learning and receive key messages and information. Pupils are proud of their school and ‘pupil ambassadors’ work with pupils in partner schools to share ideas about further improvement.
p.2
School
School self-evaluation is accurate because of your thorough analysis of school data and checks on the quality teaching and learning. Outcomes for key stage 2 pupils have been strong over time. However, you were disappointed by pupils’ overall attainment in Year 6 in 2016. Pupils’ work and the school’s own assessments support your view that the proportion of pupils currently working at the expected standard is at least similar to the national average and in many cases better. You accurately identified issues and have addressed them effectively. You agree that teachers need further support in ensuring that the learning and progress of the most able pupils in writing is accurately and consistently assessed and that subsequent next steps in learning are identified to further deepen learning.
p.2
School
Safeguarding procedures are in place and understood by all staff. You have made sure that your own training, as the designated safeguarding lead, and that of staff is up to date. You communicate well with other agencies when necessary and keep detailed information of relevant actions and support for pupils.
p.2
School
A range of teaching and learning activities and whole-school systems are in place to help pupils keep safe. For example, pupils explained that the school has a firewall to protect them from accessing inappropriate information online, but knew that these same filters may not be in place at home or when accessing the internet elsewhere. They spoke with certainty about whom they could speak to if they were worried about this, or any other aspects of safety.
p.2
Inspection findings
Your drive to ensure that pupils are actively involved in developing their reasoning skills across the curriculum is having a positive impact. In mathematics in particular, pupils across school apply new skills with confidence to solve problems, test hypotheses and share their reasoning. Older pupils demonstrate strong reasoning skills and the ability to make high-quality vocabulary and grammatical choices in English. The way in which pupils of all ages talk about their work with each other, embedding and further developing their own learning, is impressive. For example, children in the early years were supporting each other in their writing, reminding each other to sound out a new word and read their sentence to check it made sense. Pupils in lower key stage 2 were purposeful and evaluative in their work with a partner in reading activities. One child said, ‘I don’t think that we have enough evidence in the text to back that up.’
p.2
Inspection findings
Plans for the spending of the pupil premium are detailed and provide a range of support for disadvantaged pupils. These children generally make good progress over their time in school. However, plans do not always take into account the range of potential barriers that pupils may have to making good progress, and attention is not always given to providing effective support for the most able disadvantaged pupils. As a result, these pupils do not consistently make the same strong progress. Pupils speak with confidence about Christianity and demonstrate knowledge of other faiths and religions. However, they are not as clear about why it is important to learn about other people’s cultures and beliefs. Pupils’ understanding of life in modern Britain is an area that you agree requires further development.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
teachers become more skilled at assessing the most able pupils in writing and identifying next steps to further deepen learning the most able disadvantaged pupils are well supported in making good progress pupils develop a good understanding of life in modern Britain.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Leeds, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection you and I spent time together in classrooms and looking at pupils’ work. We discussed your evaluation of the school, the resulting action plans and the impact of this work. We looked at the progress pupils are making using the school’s assessment system and your analyses, including information about disadvantaged pupils. I attended collective worship.
p.3
Information about the inspection
I met with leaders, governors, early years staff, pupils, parents, the school administration team and the new local authority partner.
p.3
Information about the inspection
I scrutinised a range of documentation, including that relating to safeguarding, attendance, the quality of teaching and learning, external reviews of the school and responses from parents, staff and pupils to Ofsted’s online questionnaires.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion