Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Little Oaks Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Tracy Ann Hart
- Group reference verified
RP909768
- Inspection date verified
7 Feb 2017
- Inspectors verified
Maura Pigram
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Little Oaks Pre-School
- URN verified
EY392996
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Activities are not consistently well planned. p.1
- Children are not always provided with enough challenge according to their abilities and interests to help them make good progress in their learning. p.1
- Staff's assessments of children's learning are not consistent in precisely identifying their next steps in learning. p.1
- For example, gaps in children's speech and language development are not closing quickly enough. p.1
- The provider and manager have not yet fully implemented a carefully targeted programme of support and mentoring for all staff, in order to further raise the quality of teaching. p.1
- The self-evaluation process to improve the overall practice is not yet fully implemented and monitored to ensure that priorities for improvement are identified and addressed. p.1
- The provider, manager and staff have successfully addressed all actions raised at their previous inspection. p.1
- For example, staff supervise children during their play and they now ensure that any hazardous items are kept safely away from them. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“Parents say that their children settle well.” p.3Safeguarding2
“Arrangements for safeguarding are effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 840
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Little Oaks Pre-School Adeyfield Community Centre, Queens Square, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP2 4EW
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 7 February 2017 10 October 2016
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The quality of teaching is variable. Activities are not consistently well planned. Children are not always provided with enough challenge according to their abilities and interests to help them make good progress in their learning. Staff's assessments of children's learning are not consistent in precisely identifying their next steps in learning. For example, gaps in children's speech and language development are not closing quickly enough. The provider and manager have not yet fully implemented a carefully targeted programme of support and mentoring for all staff, in order to further raise the quality of teaching. The self-evaluation process to improve the overall practice is not yet fully implemented and monitored to ensure that priorities for improvement are identified and addressed.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The provider, manager and staff have successfully addressed all actions raised at their previous inspection. For example, staff supervise children during their play and they now ensure that any hazardous items are kept safely away from them. Children happily play with the activities and resources on offer. These generally cover various areas of learning. Staff praise and encourage children during their play and routines. This helps to promote their self-esteem. Staff are very aware of children's individual dietary requirements. Children are provided with healthy meals.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve the planning of activities to ensure children are provided with purposeful play and challenges according to their abilities and following their current interests, in order to support their good progress 24/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the assessments of all children's progress accurately identify the next steps in their learning so that these precisely inform future planning 24/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure any gaps in children's learning are quickly identified and addressed to help them make good progress. 24/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
monitor staff practice through effective supervision meetings to identify and implement further professional development needs improve self-evaluation so that targets for development are prioritised, well known, implemented and monitored to show the impact on the overall quality of practice.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector spoke with staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector completed joint observations with the provider and with the manager. The inspector held a meeting with the provider and the manager. She looked at children's records, the safeguarding policy and evidence of the suitability of staff. The inspector spoke to a number of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Since the last inspection, staff have increased their knowledge about their responsibilities to safeguard children. They demonstrate a suitable understanding of possible signs that children may be at risk. Staff know the action to take to report such concerns. Suitable recruitment and vetting procedures are in place to help ensure that all adults are suitable to work with children. The provider and manager have worked with the local authority and continue to move forward with this support. However, they have not identified weaknesses in the support for teaching and learning. The manager has completed training to support her in her role. Staff inductions are carried out so that they understand their roles and responsibilities. The manager has started to do supervisions of staff practice to discuss their work with children. However, these are not yet clearly focused and embedded to help make a
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Since the last inspection, staff gather information about what children can already do from parents. They use this along with their own observations in their initial planning. However, staff do not always precisely analyse the information gained from their observations and assessments. Consequently, staff do not have a deep understanding of children's precise learning needs. At times, staff use some effective teaching strategies. However, on occasions, staff take on a supervisory role rather than being actively engaged in helping children's learning. Some planned group sessions do not always effectively support the learning needs of some children. For example, children who have special educational needs and those who speak English as an additional language are less engaged. Older children enjoy playing card games to help promote their mathematical development. Babies have fun exploring interactive toys and staff are attentive to their needs.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Staff use effective strategies to help children to behave well. For example, sand timers are used to support children's understanding about the passing of time when waiting for a turn on popular toys. A key-person system is in place to help children feel secure. Parents say that their children settle well. Staff obtain information from parents about the methods used at home to soothe, comfort and care for their babies. Children are able to sleep or rest according to their needs. They benefit from regular opportunities to be active and engage in physical play, such as riding bikes and playing with bats and balls. Staff remind children how to keep themselves safe during routines and play. For example, they explain the need to walk indoors.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Some children are not always supported to make the best possible progress in learning. This includes children who speak English as an additional language and those who have special educational needs. Children are gaining some of the skills needed for their next stage in learning, including school. For example, they demonstrate appropriate social skills and their early mathematical skills are developing.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY392996 Local authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 1077175 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 41 Number of children on roll 32 Name of registered person Tracy Ann Hart
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 10 October 2016 Telephone number 01442 252 030
p.4
reference number
Little Oaks Pre-School was registered in 2009. The pre-school employs six members of childcare staff, four of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The pre-school opens Monday to Friday for 46 weeks of the year. Sessions are from 8am until 6pm. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children. The pre-school supports children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion