Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Rodborough Community Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 Feb 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Steffi Penny
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GL5 3RT
- Name on report verified
Rodborough Community Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers new to the school receive excellent support. p.1
- Nevertheless, the personalised spending pays dividends for their personal development and welfare, where they make excellent strides. p.3
- At the previous inspection, the school’s leaders were asked to increase the amount of good and outstanding teaching in mathematics, especially in Years 1 to 3. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment8
“Teachers new to the school receive excellent support.” p.1Records & policies3
“Processes, policies and procedures are robust and fit for purpose.” p.2SEND & inclusion2
“have special educational needs.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,118
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs M Halsey Headteacher Rodborough Community Primary School Rodborough Hill Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 3RT
p.1
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 2 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2012.
p.1
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. There have been a significant number of changes in staff since the previous inspection. However, you know that all staff and the governing body are a committed and hard-working group of people, with the outcomes for pupils being at the heart of all they do. You, senior leaders and the governing body have an accurate view of the strengths of the school, and the areas that need further improvement. Your school action plan is pithy, pertinent and precise.
p.1
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
Rodborough school is a happy place in which to work and play. Parents and staff are overwhelmingly supportive of the school and all that goes on in it. Parents are proud of their children’s achievements and would recommend the school to others. Teachers are willing to embrace change and try different methods to improve the quality of learning in their lessons. Teachers new to the school receive excellent support.
p.1
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
Pupils relish coming to school, feeling safe and protected. They enjoy their learning and the friendships they make. The school’s ethos, underpinned by the school’s motto and rules, is followed and understood by all. As a result, pupils blossom as thoughtful and considerate members of society.
p.1
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
At the previous inspection, the school’s leaders were asked to increase the amount of good and outstanding teaching in mathematics, especially in Years 1 to 3. Typically leaders have risen to the challenge. With the deputy headteacher, you have ensured that teaching and learning in mathematics is strong in all classes. Testimony to this are the key stage 2 results in 2016, where pupils’ performance was strong.
p.1
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
You have identified where improvements need to be made to improve pupils’ writing, for example by reducing pupils’ errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar. However, we saw that pupils are now writing at greater length, and demonstrating increasingly complex ideas and skills, particularly in their stories.
p.2
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
You have already made good headway in making improvements. You and other leaders are aware that more needs to be done, particularly when pupils are in lessons other than in English and mathematics, to develop their mastery skills.
p.2
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
You and the business manager have ensured that detailed records relating to the safeguarding and protection of pupils are systematically and carefully kept.
p.2
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
Processes, policies and procedures are robust and fit for purpose. You and the governing body have ensured that staff are well trained and kept up to date with statutory guidance and best practice. For example, all staff have received training on identifying potential child sexual exploitation, the dangers of extremism and radicalisation, and female genital mutilation.
p.2
Short inspection of Rodborough Community Primary School
You regularly involve other professionals in the community to support parents and pupils in knowing how to keep safe. Further work is planned, keeping them regularly aware of the latest developments and potential dangers in a digitally changing world. Through using the acronym ‘SMART’ (safe, meeting, accepting, reliable, tell), and the carefully thought through personal, social, health and economics programme, pupils are well aware how to keep safe on social media and know who to go to if they have concerns. The ‘Ditto’ newsletter, and information on the school’s website, help to keep parents informed and provide links for additional help and advice.
p.2
Inspection findings
Initially, I wanted to find out what the school had done following on from the previous inspection, when leaders were asked to improve the teaching of mathematics. You and the deputy headteacher have worked relentlessly to ensure that mathematics is taught more consistently in all classes. Teachers, and teaching assistants, have embraced the new ways of teaching mathematics that have been introduced. As a result, pupils are making better progress in mathematics than they have in the past. When we looked in pupils’ books we saw that sometimes younger pupils could work at greater depth sooner and that a lot of their answers were always correct. My second line of enquiry was to see if there were any differences between the progress made by girls and boys. This was because in key stage 2 statutory tests in 2016, boys made average progress in reading and writing compared with girls, who made well above average progress. From the evidence seen in pupils’ work,
p.2
Inspection findings
and school records, the difference between the progress that girls and boys make is not generally as large. Also, sometimes boys do better than girls. The reasons for the differences in progress are specific to the individual pupils in different year groups. To ascertain that the school remained good, I wanted to check how well the pupil premium fund was being used to support those pupils entitled to it. You and the governing body have provided a raft of different types of support for these disadvantaged pupils. It is clear that because of carefully targeted spending of the pupil premium funds these pupils make better progress than seen nationally. However, we noted that sometimes they do not make the same rate of strong academic progress as their classmates. Nevertheless, the personalised spending pays dividends for their personal development and welfare, where they make excellent strides. Finally, I wanted to know how well the school identifies and supports pupils who
p.3
Inspection findings
have special educational needs. You, acting as the special education needs coordinator, accurately identify, know and understand the special needs of each pupil well. We noted that sometimes the progress these pupils make slows as they get older. We agreed that the school needs to have expert support from therapists, such as those with speech, language and occupational skills. This is needed to help you identify even better the pupils’ learning barriers and potential ways of overcoming them.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
they continue to develop the cross-curricular links at greater depth in a wider range of subject areas, particularly those to support pupils’ mastery of mathematics and English the school explores the use of other sources of expert provision to improve the progress that the pupils identified with special educational needs and/or disabilities make in key stage 2, compared to other pupils in the school.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I met with you and the deputy headteacher, and shared my key lines of enquiry. I also met members of the school’s governing body, and the business manager. I heard a group of pupils read and talked with pupils about their learning and life in school. I held a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority. I considered the 78 responses from the online Parent View questionnaire, the 19 responses from the staff questionnaire and the 93 responses from pupils.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I reviewed a range of documentation including that relating to safeguarding, the school’s self-evaluation and development plans, and assessment information about the achievement of and outcomes for pupils.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion