Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 9 Feb 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Nixon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Feb 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Nixon

  • Postcode verified

    FY7 6EU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehigh expectationseffectivestronghigh-qualityexcellentoutstandingimprovedpositive
Criticismweaknessesabsencelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,063
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Ann Kowalska St Mary’s Catholic Primary School, Fleetwood London Street Fleetwood Lancashire FY7 6EU

p.1

Primary School, Fleetwood

Following my visit to your school on 9 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School, Fleetwood

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School, Fleetwood

At its section 5 inspection before the one that took place in January 2015, the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

Primary School, Fleetwood

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Primary School, Fleetwood

The school should take further action to improve further the leadership of subjects other than English, mathematics and physical education.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, your deputy headteacher, pupils, three members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan. I visited every classroom with you to see the pupils and teachers at work and to examine the work in pupils’ books.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection, one member of staff has left the school and there has been some staff absence. A new teacher has been seconded from a local school that was judged outstanding at its last inspection. A new chair of governors has been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

Your strong leadership and commitment to excellence are shared by your deputy headteacher and have been effective in driving improvement since the last inspection. Governors and staff in the school share your high expectations and commitment to providing a good quality of education for pupils. They have raised their level of challenge and hold you closely to account for the impact of actions for improvement.

p.2

Main findings

You have a detailed and deep understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, which you have used well to plan appropriate actions to address the areas for development identified at the last inspection. You and your staff have constructed a high-quality development plan which is well constructed and identifies the correct priorities for improvement. The implementation of your plans has been effective in bringing about rapid improvements to the school, particularly in the quality of teaching and the progress pupils make. As a result, in 2016, key stage 2 national assessments of pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics put the school’s figures in the top 10% of all schools in the country. Disadvantaged pupils do well and make strong progress. In the 2016 national assessments, they made so much progress that they surpassed the levels of attainment achieved by other pupils nationally and by their peers in school. Better quality teaching of

p.2

Main findings

phonics ensures that pupils are making stronger progress in the development of their phonic skills.

p.2

Main findings

You have improved the quality of teaching by providing well-considered and sharply focused training for staff, particularly in phonics, mathematics and writing. Leaders set an example and demonstrate high expectations and good-quality skills in teaching that inspire pupils to engage in their learning and help teachers to improve their practice. You have shared your ambitions with all staff clearly and developed ‘class action plans’ that identify what is expected. As a result, teachers make better use of assessment to amend their planning and provide appropriate guidance to pupils about how to improve their work. Teachers and teaching assistants use questioning well to check pupils’ understanding and respond quickly to address any misconceptions. Learning is now planned more carefully and creatively to promote progress, particularly for boys. These developments include better use of local amenities such as The Mount monument to provide interesting and positive learning

p.2

Main findings

experiences for pupils outside the classroom. As a result of better teaching, pupils have excellent attitudes to learning and say that they love coming to school to learn.

p.3

Main findings

You have closely linked performance management targets to the key priorities for the school and you rightly use these to hold teachers to account for the impact of their actions on pupils’ learning. You challenge rigorously any hint of underperformance. The secondment of an experienced teacher from a local school has strengthened the quality of teaching in lower key stage 2 and complements the high-quality teaching found in other year groups.

p.3

Main findings

At the last inspection, pupils’ attendance was identified as an area for improvement. You have taken appropriate action to strengthen the school’s response to any absence. Robust systems ensure that staff rapidly establish the reasons for any absence. Personal visits by your learning mentor encourage and support parents in getting their children to school regularly. A range of rewards celebrates pupils’ punctuality and attendance and is having a positive impact on the rates of pupils’ attendance, particularly for boys and disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Main findings

You have rightly concentrated on improving the outcomes for pupils in reading, writing and mathematics to ensure that they are ready for secondary education. However, you have not lost sight of the importance of providing a wider curriculum that is broad, balanced and enjoyable. Consequently, pupils receive an education that entices and encourages them to learn. Subject leadership has improved rapidly in the school, particularly in English and mathematics. Leaders of other subjects, some of whom are new to leadership roles, are beginning to develop their skills because of the additional training and support you have provided by the secondment of an experienced teacher from another school. However, you recognise that further work is needed to develop their skills fully and ensure that their actions have the desired impact on pupils’ outcomes.

p.3

External support

The school has received and made good use of appropriate and proportionate support from the local authority which currently provides ‘light-touch’ consultancy as the school needs less and less support. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the diocese of Lancaster, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion