Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Willoughby Road Primary Academy

Inspected 26 Jan 2017 · published 27 Feb 2017 · URN 140625

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Kirsty Godfrey (lead), Don Parker, Sue Birch

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    26 Jan 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Don Parker, Kirsty Godfrey, Sue Birch

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DN17 2NF

  • Name on report verified

    Willoughby Road Primary Academy

  • URN verified

    140625

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovingeffectivepositivestronggood progresshigh expectationsrobusteffectively
Criticismrequires improvementinadequatenot yettoo fewgapsnot sufficientlynot effectivevariable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings672w−19
  • Leadership130w+71
  • Safeguarding101w+36
  • What needs to improve2113w+23

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,947
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 17%Leadership 3%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Willoughby Road Primary Academy Willoughby Road, Scunthorpe, North Lincolnshire DN17 2NF

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The relatively new headteacher has brought about substantial improvement. However, due to a legacy of underachievement, actions are not yet resulting in consistently good outcomes across the school.  The local governing body do not get enough information about the performance of different groups. This prevents them from holding school leaders to account for the standards of these groups as well as they should.  Leadership of provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is not effective in evaluating and increasing the impact of the support pupils’ receive.  Middle leadership is underdeveloped. Middle leaders do not yet have enough impact on improving the quality of teaching and learning.  Standards by the end of Year 6 are not high enough. Too few pupils make the expected progress from their different starting points.  Differences in the attainment of disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally remain wide.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The quality of teaching, while swiftly improving, is still too variable. Not all pupils receive the challenge they need, particularly the most able.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The school is improving. The headteacher provides strong and effective leadership and has eradicated inadequate teaching.  Provision in the early years is good. Children make good progress from their starting points in Nursery and Reception.  Standards and progress are improving in the early years and key stage 1.  Teachers target the gaps in pupils’ learning to ensure that they catch up. Consequently, progress rates are improving across the school.  Pupils show positive attitudes towards learning and stay focused on their work. They feel safe and well cared for in the school.  The school is a safe, calm and welcoming place in which to learn. Relationships between pupils and staff are positive.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders more precisely evaluate the impact of how additional funding for disadvantaged pupils is used so that effective plans are put in place to help them make better progress – support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is checked, evaluated and refined where necessary, to ensure that it more accurately measures and increases the impact it is having on their progress compared to all pupils nationally with similar starting points – governors have sufficient and accurate information, including about the spending of pupil premium funding, to provide robust challenge and to hold senior leaders to account effectively – middle leaders develop the ability to contribute more significantly to improving the quality of teaching and learning in their areas of responsibility  Secure consistency in the quality of teaching in every classroom so that pupils make at

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

least good progress over time, by ensuring that: – teachers in key stage 2 provide increased opportunities for pupils to develop their reading, writing and mathematics skills across the curriculum – learning is sufficiently challenging to enable more pupils to achieve higher standards, especially the most able pupils. An external review of the school’s use of pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leadership and management require improvement because too few pupils meet the academic standards that are expected for their age. Some pupils are not prepared well enough for secondary school because their basic skills in reading, writing and mathematics are not secure.  Since the head of school’s appointment in January 2016, she has taken robust actions to quickly address underperformance. However, they have not fully made amends for the weak teaching which pupils’ received in previous years. Leaders have now eradicated the inadequate teaching which existed and are taking effective action to increase consistency in the quality of teaching. Consequently, the achievement of current pupils is improving quickly.  Middle leaders’ checks on work in pupils’ books are enabling them to identify inconsistencies in pupils’ progress. However, they do not routinely check the progress of pupil groups from their starting points compared to other pupils nationally to ensure

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

that the differences are diminishing.  Leaders have not effectively evaluated the use of the extra funding to support disadvantaged pupils or those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Therefore, they have not been able to analyse the impact of the support they receive on pupils’ attainment and progress and make adjustments where necessary.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities receive effective specialist support and intervention from a team of skilled teaching assistants. However, leaders do not currently monitor or evaluate the impact of these actions on pupils’ outcomes and cannot, therefore, accurately determine the effectiveness of the measures taken.  Leaders’ self-evaluation of the school’s performance is accurate and they are focusing on the right aspects for improvement. However, actions have not yet led to consistently good progress across school due to a legacy of underachievement.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

Outcomes are improving in the early years and key stage 1.  The multi-academy trust has implemented an assessment system that regularly tracks the performance of individual pupils. The headteacher and trust learning directors meet teachers weekly to monitor progress and identify pupils who are at risk of falling behind. This is resulting in more pupils being on track to meet expected standards than in previous years.  The headteacher has established a culture in which every pupil is expected to learn well and succeed. In pursuit of this, staff have been well trained to provide skilled support for pupils. Staff are able to observe and learn from outstanding practice in other schools within the multi-academy trust. Teachers, including those at the early stages of their career, feel well supported and have a clear understanding of what they need to do to improve their teaching through the performance management process

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

and informal feedback they receive.  Cross-curriculum themes such as ‘iron man versus Stone-Age man’ interest pupils in their learning. However, there are missed opportunities for pupils to consolidate their reading, writing and mathematics skills in other subjects. Leaders are aware that the curriculum needs to be reviewed so it has a more positive impact on pupils’ development and progress.  The physical education (PE) and sports funding for primary schools is used well and is resulting in increased opportunities and greater participation in a wider range of sports. For example, by providing transport to enable pupils to take part in local competitions and the use of specialist coaches to deliver high-quality lessons.  The wider curriculum provides good opportunities for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development and prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. Pupils learn about fundamental British values and the school council makes a valuable contribution

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

to pupils’ understanding of being involved in whole-school decision-making. Pupils were proud to tell inspectors of an example when the school council were successful in improving school dinners. Councillors were involved in interviews to select a new provider and now more pupils are eating a healthy school dinner as a result.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors and directors have created a culture of high challenge and low threat within the school and are effectively holding leaders to account for pupils’ outcomes. However, they have not made sure that the school’s use of the pupil premium funding has improved achievement for disadvantaged pupils.  The multi-academy trust provides effective support for the head of school. For example, the addition of an executive head and directors of learning, allocated based on the school’s needs, are proving instrumental in swiftly improving the quality of teaching.  Governors make sure that the information they receive from school is reliable and accurate. Similar processes throughout the academy trust allow the executive head and regional director to check and compare more easily. This enables robust challenge which is supporting improvements.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Leaders have ensured that safeguarding is a priority which is threaded through all aspects of the school’s work. Staff are clear about safeguarding procedures as a result of the induction and continued training they receive. Staff report concerns quickly and leaders respond with urgency.  The school has built strong relationships with families, particularly those facing challenging or complex circumstances. A team of learning mentors works effectively with external agencies to target the appropriate support as well as using their own skills and strategies to support pupils and protect their well-being and safety.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching requires improvement because the impact on learning is variable. Over time, not enough pupils make the good or better progress required to achieve their full potential. Improvements in pupils’ outcomes have been slow due to the weaknesses in teaching which leaders have since tackled. Teachers do not sufficiently challenge the most able pupils.  In key stage 2, teachers do not provide enough opportunities for pupils to deepen their understanding and/or consolidate or extend their reading, writing and mathematics skills by applying them across the curriculum.  Regular review of pupils’ learning using the new assessment system is enabling leaders and teachers to work together to identify which pupils need to urgently receive targeted support in class to help them catch up. Teachers now have an accurate understanding of the gaps in pupils’ learning and are using this to plan their next steps.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Lesson observations, pupils’ work and assessment information show that teaching throughout school is helping pupils to catch up lost ground in their learning resulting from their prior underachievement. More pupils are now on track to meet expected standards.  Teaching is becoming increasingly consistent across key stage 1 and 2 and is ensuring that pupils are making swifter progress towards the end of each key stage.  Teaching is consistently strong in Year 6 and is benefiting from additional support from academy trust learning directors. Pupils are keen to improve their work and routinely self-assess their learning and set themselves targets to help them improve. This means that they have a good understanding of the expectations and are producing a higher standard of work as a result.  The teaching of phonics is a particular focus in key stage 1 and pupils who need to catch up receive intervention. This is helping them to read and spell new words.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching assistants are an asset to the school and work closely with teachers to improve learning for pupils. Intervention for disadvantaged pupils and support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities successfully help pupils to practise their basic skills independently.  Pupils enjoy sharing a class book and are making good use of the new library facilities.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  High expectations from teachers result in keen attitudes to work that contribute well to pupils’ learning. Pupils are able to concentrate and sustain their interest for long periods and were often unaware of the inspectors visiting their classrooms.  School leaders have ensured that the wider curriculum helps pupils understand how to stay safe. Pupils referred to assemblies and displays around school which remind them about how to stay safe online or how to report a concern about safety.  Pupils are aware of different types of bullying and understand the dangers. They explained that while bullying sometimes happens they know what to do and who to speak to. Pupils feel reassured that they have a nominated member of staff each year who is someone they can comfortably talk to about anything that is worrying them.  Pupils make a good contribution to the life of the school and enjoy taking on

p.5

Personal development and welfare

responsible roles such as school councillors.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Increased supervision is required to achieve acceptable conduct for a small minority of pupils at breaktimes and lunchtime. When pupils enter the building and supervision becomes reduced, for example in corridors, this results in some of them not demonstrating self-discipline.  A new policy for behaviour, a consistent approach from staff and high expectations from the headteacher have all had a major impact on improving behaviour. Leaders monitor pupils’ behaviour closely and it is followed up robustly. Exclusions were used widely but have now reduced and the number of behaviour incidents has continued to decline.  During lessons, pupils are attentive and behave well as they are focused on their learning because expectations from staff are high.  Attendance is showing a slight improvement but remains just below the national average. More recent actions are making a difference but the school accepts that more

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Standards and progress in key stage 1 and 2 have not been good enough in recent years. Standards which are below the national average at the end of key stage 2 mean that many pupils are not adequately prepared for the next key stage. The progress that current pupils make is rapidly improving and far more pupils are on track to meet the expected standard this year. However, a legacy of underachievement for these pupils means that there is still a significant amount of catching up to do.  Progress is strong and improving in key stage 1 for pupils who met the expectations at the end of the early years. However, lower-ability disadvantaged pupils and most-able pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, did not make as much progress in reading, writing and mathematics as other pupils nationally with the same starting points.  The proportion of pupils meeting the standard in phonics is rising each year and was

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

72% in 2016. This does remain below the national average of 81%, however. Current pupils are receiving effective phonics provision and those who read to inspectors showed they were using phonics strategies well. Combined with additional intervention for targeted individuals, this is resulting in predictions for the improvement to continue.  Although disadvantaged pupils benefit from improved teaching and additional intervention to address the gaps in their learning, the difference between their attainment and other pupils nationally is not diminishing quickly enough. Leaders do not sufficiently evaluate the use of pupil premium funding to help them identify which activities will result in the greatest impact on pupils’ learning.  Leaders have increased intervention and targeted support in Year 2 and 6 to help as many pupils as possible make the progress needed for them to catch up with reading, writing and mathematics. Consequently, work in books and lessons confirm that

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

progress has accelerated in these year groups and is helping more pupils to be ready for the next stage of their learning. However, teachers do not always make sure that the most able pupils are sufficiently challenged to make the progress they are capable of.  The improvements seen in English and mathematics are not replicated in other subjects across the curriculum. Leaders also recognise that further extending pupils’ reading, writing and mathematics skills in other subject areas needs development.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported to work independently and meet the targets they have been set. However, leaders do not evaluate the impact of this provision on the group of learners to make decisions about how best to meet their needs.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Progress in the early years is good because leadership has had considerable impact on improving outcomes for children. The proportion of children who are reaching a good level of development has increased from 43% to 63% over the last three years.  Children typically begin school with starting points which are much lower than usual for their age. They often have underdeveloped speech and language but due to the teaching they receive they begin to catch up quickly. This gives them a positive start so that they are more ready for the curriculum in key stage 1. An increasing proportion of children are predicted to exceed the early learning goals at the end of the school year.  The funding for disadvantaged children is being used to successfully diminish the difference between disadvantaged children and all children nationally over time. However, leaders are aware that boys do not make as much progress as girls.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Leaders have tailored the provision to place a focus on children’s reading, writing and mathematics development. Teachers plan learning activities which are clearly focused on the next steps for individuals and groups and this results in children making good progress with their learning.  Leaders have ensured that staff are highly skilled to be able to support the children’s learning and development. For example, all staff are using learning time well to help improve children’s phonics skills. This means children have lots of chances to practise their newly acquired skills throughout the school day, whether indoors or out.  Teachers use their knowledge of children’s interests to encourage them to participate in activities which precisely target the skills they need. For example, a child who was having difficulty with pencil control was quick to improve once provided with an enjoyable task appealing to their competitive nature and love of spiders.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 The early years unit has a very calm atmosphere and children demonstrate positive learning behaviours. They share, cooperate and access the provision independently with appropriate levels of concentration for their age. The older Reception-aged children are good role models for the Nursery-aged children. Consequently, they quickly learn about the expectations of their learning behaviour and general conduct.  Staff take safeguarding responsibilities seriously and all of the welfare requirements are met. The fortnightly meetings for staff are a successful means of staff receiving safety and welfare updates.  Staff make regular contact with parents each day and while leaders recognise that links with parents could be strengthened further, the participation in a reading programme which provides free books and promotes a love of reading is encouraging parents to read more often with their children at home.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority Delta Academy Trust

p.9

School details

Headteacher Elaine Jupp (Head of Academy)

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.9

Information about this school

 Willoughby Road Primary Academy became a sponsored academy on 1 April 2014 with School Partnership Trust Academies, now known as the Delta Academy Trust. When its predecessor school, Willoughby Road Primary School, was last inspected by Ofsted it was judged to require improvement.  The headteacher, known as the head of academy, began her post in January 2016 and the executive principal in January 2017. Three teachers have left the school in the last year and have been replaced by newly qualified teachers. The vice-principal was absent from school at the time of the inspection.  The school receives extensive support through the multi-academy trust. Currently, this includes a learning director who supports the school for two days a week.  The school is larger than average.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for pupil premium funding is above the national average.  The majority of pupils are White British and a small proportion are from a range of

p.9

Information about this school

minority ethnic groups. The proportion who speak English as an additional language is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is average and the proportion who have an education, health and care plan is below the national average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics by the end of Year 6.  The school does not meet requirements on the publication of specified information about the curriculum, special educational needs and/or disabilities and the PE and sport premium on its website.  The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed teaching in every class. Most observations were undertaken jointly with the headteacher. Inspectors observed the teaching of early reading skills and listened to pupils read. They talked to pupils about their school and evaluated the quality of work in a sample of pupils’ books.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher and executive principal, the regional director from the Delta Academy Trust and two representatives from the governing body, one of whom was also chair of the board of directors. Inspectors also discussed the school’s work with the early years leader and the leaders of English and mathematics. Discussions took place with teachers and newly qualified teachers about the support and development they receive.  A range of documentation was considered including the school’s self-evaluation; records of the monitoring of teaching and learning; the school improvement plan; the

p.11

Information about this inspection

school’s performance data; information on the progress of particular pupil groups; information relating to attendance and behaviour of pupils; safeguarding and child protection records; and minutes from governing body meetings. Documents outlining the arrangements for the use of pupil premium and the PE and sport premium funding were also considered.  Inspectors spoke to parents informally at the start of the school day in order to seek their views about the school. Inspectors took account of the 28 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View.  Twenty-seven responses to the staff questionnaire were also taken into account.

p.11

Inspection team

Kirsty Godfrey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Sue Birch Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion