Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Welling School

Inspected 26 Jan 2017 · published 23 Feb 2017 · URN 136720

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kanwaljit Singh (lead), Sam Hainey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    26 Jan 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kanwaljit Singh, Sam Hainey

  • Postcode verified

    DA16 1LB

  • Name on report verified

    Welling School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveexcellenthigh expectationspositivelysafepoliterespectfulfeel safe
Criticismexclusionstoo slowconcernsbelownot yetlowerunclearnot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1332w+35
  • What needs to improve102w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,426
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Diane Khanna Headteacher Welling School Elsa Road Welling Kent DA16 1LB

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Welling School

Following my visit to your academy with Kanwaljit Singh, Ofsted Inspector, on 26 January 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss behaviour in your academy.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Welling School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills was concerned about behaviour at the academy.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors considered evidence that included:

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons  observations of pupils’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with pupils  documentary evidence  discussions with school leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to maintain the high standards of behaviour and attitudes identified at the school’s previous inspection.

p.1

Context

Welling School is a much larger than average-sized 11–19 secondary school. The proportion of pupils who are entitled to free schools meals is above the national average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is below the national average, as is the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, particularly those with support needs, is twice the national average. The school has a significant number of in-year admissions, for example, 25% of the current Year 11 pupils did not start their education at the school in Year 7. Attainment on entry from primary school is significantly below the national average.

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

The majority of pupils at the school are typically polite, friendly and respectful to each other and adults. Pupils are calm and orderly, both inside and outside the classroom. Pupils were observed lining up quietly to access the canteen, and after using the canteen facilities, pupils tidied up after themselves. The canteen staff said this is typical. They describe pupils, when in the canteen, as ‘good as gold’. All areas of the school are well supervised and most pupils report that this is normally what happens. Due to the size of the school, you have two separate break and three separate lunch timings. This is effective in managing the flow of pupils and ensuring that pupils can access the canteen during these times. All pupils that spoke to inspectors stated that they feel safe at the school, including when using cash loaders to pay for their food or drinks, inside the toilets, and in moving around

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

the school. The majority of pupils wear their uniform with pride. Not all adults challenge pupils when they are not wearing their full school uniform.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

In lessons, most pupils follow the instructions of their teachers, settle to work quickly and are punctual to their lessons. Attitudes to learning are generally positive. The behaviour and attitudes of pupils at key stage 3 is better, overall, than for pupils at key stage 4. At key stage 4, some pupils take too long to settle down to their work and engage in attention-seeking behaviour.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

A revised behaviour for learning policy, including launching the ‘Welling Ways’ of collaboration, communication, organisation, resilience, leadership and creativity, was launched at the beginning of the school year. This included a new approach as to how teachers should reward good behaviour for learning. You know that the policy is not yet embedded well. In some lessons, teachers have high expectations of behaviour, lessons begin promptly and any off-task behaviour is challenged quickly. In a few cases, some teachers do not use the range of sanctions quickly or appropriately. Pupils, staff and leaders spoken to during the inspection stated that there needs to be greater consistency so all teachers follow the behaviour policy. Pupils feel that, in some cases, teachers are too slow to use sanctions and in others, teachers do not use rewards enough. Embedding the new policy is, rightly, part of your school improvement planning.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Leaders are clear in their communication to parents and pupils that they will not tolerate certain behaviours, including bullying or fighting. Fixed-term exclusions had previously been lower than the national average. You are aware that, for example, in the autumn term 2016, fixed-term exclusions rose sharply. This is because you have not shied away from deciding to exclude a pupil where you feel that this is an appropriate sanction. Leaders acknowledge that the number of repeat exclusions for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has risen. As part of the school’s equality duty, one of the school’s objectives is, correctly, to reduce this.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Leaders, and the governing body, monitor the total number of exclusions. For example, leaders compared the autumn term 2016 with previous autumn terms and analysed exclusions by different year groups. Detentions and pupils’ removal from lessons are managed by subject areas. Leaders are not rigorous enough in analysing the proportions of exclusions, detentions, removal from lessons or rewards for different groups of pupils across the whole school. Leaders are, therefore, unable to quickly identify and respond accurately to any emerging trends and patterns. For example, they are unclear as to whether one group of pupils is being disproportionately affected by sanctions more than another.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils who exhibit challenging behaviours over time, including pupils who have specific behavioural needs, are well supported by the school, including through early help and intervention. The adults who work in the school’s ‘learning zone’ provide effective support for pupils in developing their social skills, learning how to manage their emotions and in taking responsibility for their actions. ‘The Berwick Centre’, situated within the school, manages provision for internally excluded pupils. Staff who work in the centre ensure that pupils are given age-appropriate work to complete during time spent there.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Sometimes, pupils who join the school mid-year can have a high level of need. Your team is working hard to meet these needs effectively and to ensure that appropriate help and support is in place. Sixth-form students are effective role models for younger pupils. They are mature, friendly and interact positively with lower year groups. Sixth-form students talk positively about their experiences when, for example, they were in key stage 4 last year. In the words of a sixth-form student, ‘The level of teaching has made me the person I am now.’

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils feel that they are educated well on how to stay safe. Pupils are able to talk about what they have learned about staying safe outside of school from a recent assembly on knife crime and offensive weapons from the police liaison officer. School leaders had followed this up with information for parents in the ‘Safeguarding Newsletter’. Students spoke confidently about how to stay safe online, including their understanding of sexting and cyber bullying. Pupils know how to say safe during non-routine events at the school such as a fire drill. Staff, should the need ever arise, know to whom they should report any safety concerns.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils state that differences such as sexual orientation, religion or beliefs are celebrated at the school. In the words of another pupil: ‘We learn about how to prevent hatred.’ Almost all pupils spoken to commented, as supported by the school’s records, that bullying is rare. Pupils were unequivocally clear that the ‘care and guidance’ staff that work with each year group are an excellent support to them. This is one reason why pupils feel that there is always an adult to whom they can turn when needed.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Systems for managing attendance and punctuality are effective. Leaders and the governing body analyse attendance information carefully and it is tracked for different groups of pupils. For example, in the autumn term 2016 there was a sharp rise in the number of unauthorised holidays. A rise in fixed-term exclusions has also impacted on the attendance of groups such as pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Inspectors looked at a variety of case studies where leaders’ actions, including working with parents and carers, have secured improved attendance for pupils.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Leaders ensuring that all teachers follow the school’s behaviour for learning policy consistently, intervening quickly particularly when a pupil’s behaviour does not meet expectations and using the range of rewards available to them.  Leaders ensuring that they analyse precisely information about behaviour that relates to exclusions, detentions, removal from lessons and rewards for different groups of pupils, so that they can identify any patterns and respond appropriately.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bexley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion