Schools & FE · Independent school inspection
Tumblewood Community School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Jan 2017
- Inspectors verified
Stephen Lee
- Postcode verified
BA13 4LF
- Name on report verified
Tumblewood Community School
- URN verified
132775
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of record-keeping in relation to safeguarding incidents and the school’s work with external agencies, including children’s services, is inconsistent and sometimes poor. p.1
- It is not being implemented effectively, however, as the deficiencies in safeguarding practice and p.1
- Chronologies of actions taken by the school often lack detail, are incomplete or are entirely absent from pupils’ records. p.1
- This is unacceptable and exposes pupils to potential risk. p.1
- There are shortcomings in relation to record-keeping, staff training and the checks made on the suitability of staff. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The proprietor must ensure that arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State (paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b)). p.4
- This reflects more accurately the school’s policy that restrictive physical intervention should p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,241
- shorter than usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
School and residential emergency inspection report
p.1
Tumblewood Community School The Laurels, 4 Hawkeridge Road, Heywood, Westbury, Wiltshire BA13 4LF
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b) This emergency inspection was undertaken as a result of complaints that raised wider concerns about safeguarding, the management of pupils’ behaviour, the supervision of pupils, and the leadership and management of the school. The proprietors and school leaders have not ensured that a robust culture of safeguarding has been developed in the school. There are shortcomings in relation to record-keeping, staff training and the checks made on the suitability of staff. The quality of record-keeping in relation to safeguarding incidents and the school’s work with external agencies, including children’s services, is inconsistent and sometimes poor. Records of key meetings are not routinely kept in pupils’ files. Chronologies of actions taken by the school often lack detail, are incomplete or are entirely absent from pupils’ records. Training for school staff does not follow the guidance issued by the Secretary of State
p.1
Main inspection findings
for Education. The most recent internal safeguarding training for school staff referred to out-of-date guidance. Staff are not routinely given part one of ‘Keeping children safe in education’, September 2016, at induction, as required by that document. Moreover, there is no evidence that all staff have received a copy of this guidance since it was last updated. Taken together, these shortfalls in the quality of staff training seriously impair attempts to create an effective culture of safeguarding in the school. Proprietors have failed to carry out the necessary checks to ensure that no teachers are subject to prohibition or interim prohibition orders. This is unacceptable and exposes pupils to potential risk. The school’s safeguarding policy, which is available on its website, was drawn up in November 2016 and does pay due regard to the latest guidance. It is not being implemented effectively, however, as the deficiencies in safeguarding practice and
p.1
Main inspection findings
training indicate. Paragraph 9, 9(a), 9(b), 9(c) The school has a behaviour management policy which is supported by a separate rewards and sanctions policy. These policies make the school’s approach to the management of pupils’ behaviour clear to parents and staff. Pupils in the school often arrive presenting challenging behaviour and, in most cases, the school works effectively to reduce the frequency and seriousness of behavioural incidents over time. The atmosphere in lessons and at other times is largely calm, and when incidents do occur staff use well-established de-escalation techniques to deal with them effectively. Since the last standard inspection in December 2015, the use of restrictive physical intervention rose markedly and by mid 2016 it was being used on an almost daily basis. Since then, however, the frequency of its use has dropped significantly. This reflects more accurately the school’s policy that restrictive physical intervention should
p.1
Main inspection findings
be used as a last resort. The school keeps thorough electronic records of behavioural incidents. These records include particularly detailed accounts of the use of restrictive physical intervention, including types of hold and their duration, with a rationale for their use. All school staff have up-to-date training in the use of restrictive physical intervention. The school keeps a record of the sanctions imposed on pupils in cases of misbehaviour. Paragraph 11 The school’s written health and safety policy is clear and supported by specific policies relating to, for example, hazardous chemicals or electricity at work. These policies are effective tools in ensuring that the relevant health and safety legislation is complied with. Paragraph 14 Pupils are well supervised during the school day, whether in lessons or at other times. Levels of supervision take account of the particular needs of each individual pupil.
p.2
Main inspection findings
There are well-established routines for ensuring that supervision continues during transition between lessons or between lessons and social times. Staff are clear about their roles in this system of supervision. Paragraph 16, 16(a), 16(b) All pupils have individual risk assessments. Most of these are effective documents which help to minimise identified risks. They are based around a secure knowledge of pupils’ needs and any particular patterns of behaviour they have exhibited in the past. They are updated regularly to reflect changes in the pupils’ circumstances, needs or behaviour. In some cases, however, the risk assessments are not as thorough or as regularly updated and this reduces their effectiveness as working documents. The school has risk assessments which cover all the activities that are undertaken during the school day. They dovetail well with the health and safety policies and are effective parts of the school’s drive to reduce any risks that are identified.
p.2
Main inspection findings
The standards in this part are not met. Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraph 18(2), 18(2)(b) The school has not undertaken the necessary checks to ensure that teachers are not subject to prohibition or interim prohibition orders. Paragraph 21(1)–21(3)(b) The school’s register of the checks that it makes on the backgrounds of staff and their suitability to work with children does not meet with requirements. The date on which an identity check was made is not included in the register. This is also true for the date on which a check was made on a member of staff’s right to work in the United Kingdom. As no checks for prohibition orders have been made, there is no information about this aspect of pre-employment checking recorded in the register. The standards in this part are not met.
p.2
Main inspection findings
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b), 34(1)(c) The proprietors and school leaders have not ensured that all the independent school standards are consistently met. This has led to pupils being exposed to unnecessary risk and has, therefore, not promoted their welfare effectively. The standard in this part is not met.
p.3
standards for residential special schools
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.
p.4
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
The proprietor must ensure that arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State (paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b)). The proprietor must ensure that no member of staff carries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction (paragraph 18(2)(b)). The proprietor keeps a register which shows in relation to each member of staff (‘S’), appointed on or after 1 May 2007, whether: – S’s identity was checked and a check of S’s right to work in the United Kingdom was made, including the date on which such check was completed or the certificate
p.4
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
obtained – a check was made to establish whether S is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed (paragraph 21(1), 21(3), 21(3)(a), 21(3)(a)(i), 21(3)(a)(vii), 21(3)(b)). The proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and actively promote the well-being of pupils (paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b), 34(1)(c)).
p.4
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.5
School details
Gender of pupils in the sixth form Girls
p.5
School details
Of which, number on roll in sixth form 0
p.5
School details
Headteacher Jennifer Lewis; Fiona Wiseman (acting headteacher) Annual fees (day pupils) £64,000
p.5
School details
Email address jennifer.lewis@tumblewood.org
p.5
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 1–3 December 2015
p.5
Information about this school
Tumblewood Community School is a small school that caters for girls with significant social, emotional and mental health problems. The proprietors are responsible for the governance of the school. The school is currently led by an acting headteacher who took up post in December 2016. The school’s last standard inspection took place in December 2015. The school currently uses two alternative providers, Larkrise Community Farm and The Springfields Academy.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This emergency inspection was undertaken as a result of complaints that raised wider concerns about safeguarding, the management of pupils’ behaviour, the supervision of pupils and the leadership and management of the school. The inspection was conducted without notice. During the inspection, the inspector held discussions with the acting headteacher, the proprietors and other staff. He also talked to pupils throughout the day both formally and informally. The inspector observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and in social times as they interacted with their peers and adults. The inspector examined a wide range of the school’s documents, including those related to safeguarding, behaviour, health and safety and risk assessment. He checked the single central register and cross-referenced this with staff files. Pupils’ files were also examined.
p.7
Inspection team
Stephen Lee, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.8
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.8
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion