Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
De Lacy Academy
Summary
Bernard Campbell (lead), Fiona Dixon, Helen Townsley, Lesley Powell
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Jan 2017
- Inspectors verified
Bernard Campbell, Fiona Dixon, Helen Townsley, Lesley Powell
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WF11 0BZ
- Name on report verified
De Lacy Academy
- URN verified
138006
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders’ whole-school strategies and the deployment of pupil premium funding have been highly effective in promoting disadvantaged pupils’ academic achievement and personal development, overall. p.3
- Their own, and their teachers’, strong commitment contributes to their good progress. p.3
- Teachers set high expectations, communicate clear objectives and regularly signpost what they expect pupils to do and achieve in the next lesson. p.5
- Strong accountability, accurate assessment, sharp analysis and prompt action are driving improvements in pupils’ progress. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Develop the coaching of staff to bring about further improvements in the quality of teaching. p.2
- Ensure that the increased challenge for the most able results in stronger progress, especially in science. p.2
- Further develop reading and writing at key stage 3 and ensure that disadvantaged pupils make increased progress in English at key stage 4. p.2
- Increase attendance and reduce the incidence of behaviour that leads to exclusion. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment39
“Their own, and their teachers’, strong commitment contributes to their good progress.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,419
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
De Lacy Academy Middle Lane, Knottingley, West Yorkshire WF11 0BZ
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Strong and purposeful leadership by the executive principal has brought about significant improvements since the last inspection. The academy trust’s new leadership and recently increased support have accelerated the pace of improvement. Firm performance management and coherent professional development have improved the quality of teaching and learning. Effective whole-school approaches underpin the good teaching. As a result, pupils learn consistently well across year groups and subjects. In a few cases, teachers are still learning to apply recently introduced methods. The trust has been instrumental in setting high standards of behaviour. Behaviour is good in classrooms and around the school. Pupils work hard, concentrate well, enjoy learning and get on with minimum disruption. A few pupils have not fully accepted the higher expectations and their non- compliance has led to more fixed-term exclusions.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Good personal development widens pupils’ experience, develops their self-confidence and supports their academic achievement, including disadvantaged pupils. Strong accountability, accurate assessment, sharp analysis and prompt action are driving improvements in pupils’ progress. Pupils’ overall progress in the 2016 GCSE results was above the national average. Disadvantaged pupils achieved particularly well. Progress was strong in performing arts, sports and information technology. Pupils’ progress in English, mathematics, science, humanities and modern foreign languages was in line with national figures. The most able did less well in science and disadvantaged pupils did less well in English. Teachers and teaching assistants are working effectively to improve pupils’ literacy at key stage 3. However, the library and its resources are limited. Attendance remains below average.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Develop the coaching of staff to bring about further improvements in the quality of teaching. Ensure that the increased challenge for the most able results in stronger progress, especially in science. Further develop reading and writing at key stage 3 and ensure that disadvantaged pupils make increased progress in English at key stage 4. Increase attendance and reduce the incidence of behaviour that leads to exclusion.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The executive principal’s purposeful leadership has brought about significant improvement in teaching, learning and outcomes since the last inspection. The positive culture he has established promotes pupils’ personal development well, including for disadvantaged pupils. Parents who responded to the Ofsted online questionnaire were highly positive about the school. With the support of the trust, the executive principal and senior leaders have improved the quality of behaviour and the environment for learning in classrooms. The executive principal has taken firm action to manage staff performance and has tackled weaker aspects of teaching or leadership effectively. Systematic checks on teaching and pupils’ work, when necessary, result in staff support plans with deadlines for improvement. Leaders have established a coherent and effective whole-school approach to teaching and learning. Teachers are committed to these methods and praise the quality of
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
professional development. Many staff have volunteered to take part in a leadership programme led by trust leaders, reflecting the shared ambition of staff and the trust. Recently introduced collaborative methods have extended teachers’ skills, including a new approach to promoting higher achievement in lessons, especially by the most able. Leaders have identified the need for more bespoke coaching to improve specific aspects of teaching. Rigorous systems of assessment, a sharp focus on the progress of each pupil, especially in Year 11, and prompt action to support pupils’ academic progress and their welfare have accelerated pupils’ progress. Strong accountability ensures that staff, at all levels, quickly tackle any aspects of underachievement, especially at key stage 4. Subject leaders implement and manage school systems for teaching and assessment rigorously and effectively. The English leader and special educational needs coordinator work together effectively,
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
and use the catch-up funding well, to increase pupils’ phonic knowledge and their reading comprehension. Low-ability pupils make good progress in numeracy. Leaders’ whole-school strategies and the deployment of pupil premium funding have been highly effective in promoting disadvantaged pupils’ academic achievement and personal development, overall. However, in the 2016 GCSE results, the progress of disadvantaged pupils was not as strong in English. Leaders manage the curriculum thoughtfully and flexibly. They have increased time for history and geography at key stage 3 to promote literacy and increase pupils’ skills in extended writing. More time for English, mathematics and science is a response to the higher demands of GCSE. The school has added a modern language. Some pupils complete courses in Year 10, which gives them time in Year 11 to improve their grades in English, mathematics and other subjects. Leaders have coordinated with local trust
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
primary schools to weed out repetition from Year 6 to Year 7. The personal, social and health education programme provides pupils with clear information and guidance that prepares them well for life in modern Britain. Many pupils participate in enrichment activities. These extend pupils’ experience and confidence, and promote their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development effectively, especially for disadvantaged pupils. Coloured badges worn by many pupils promote and reward their involvement well. Many pupils in Year 11 attend extra support sessions after school, on Saturdays and in holidays. Their own, and their teachers’, strong commitment contributes to their good progress. Leaders managed the closure of the sixth form well. The trust and executive principal decided that the small sixth form was no longer necessary or financially viable. Rising attainment at GCSE had enabled more pupils to move securely to other local providers.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The trust reports that staff prepared Year 12 students well for the change and they have settled well with their new 16-19 providers.
p.4
Governance of the school
Delta Academies Trust has provided a comprehensive framework of support and challenge that has accelerated improvement. Since last summer, increased support and new trust systems have strengthened the quality of leadership and management, teaching, assessment and behaviour. Rigorous trust procedures hold staff at all levels closely to account for the progress of individual pupils, especially those in Year 11. Trust subject directors provide good support for subject leaders. Trust-wide assessment provides accurate analysis of pupils’ progress and reliable benchmarks for school and subject performance. The education advisory board has a clear understanding of its role and responsibilities. Its handbook inducts and guides its members effectively. Members welcome the increased support and accountability provided by the trust. They receive informative reports from middle and senior leaders and have first-hand knowledge of school issues.
p.4
Governance of the school
Members understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses accurately. They regularly check the effectiveness of safeguarding procedures with senior staff. The education advisory board has a clear understanding of pupil premium and catch-up expenditure and its impact.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff take timely and effective action when following up any issues. Strong links with outside agencies, primary schools and parents support the actions they take to safeguard pupils. Communication between pupils and adults is good. Staff understand what action to take if they have a concern about safeguarding. Staff training is up to date. Risk assessments are thorough and appropriate control measures are in place. Leaders check the programme for teaching pupils about safeguarding to ensure that key issues are covered.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teachers’ good subject knowledge helps pupils to learn well. Teachers consistently use the school framework for lessons, which results in an interesting and enjoyable sequence of classroom activities in most lessons. Teachers set high expectations, communicate clear objectives and regularly signpost what they expect pupils to do and achieve in the next lesson. Well-established routines and the strong sense of purpose in lessons contribute well to pupils’ commitment to the task and the continuity of learning. The design of pupils’ workbooks encourages orderly presentation and helps them to reflect on their learning. Pupils actively review what they have learned and frequently improve aspects of their work. This aids their progress. Pupils value the constructive feedback from teachers and other pupils. Teachers’ accurate focus on the requirements of key stage 4 examinations enables pupils to work precisely on what they need to improve. Teachers use information from
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
the analysis of pupils’ answers in formal assessments to adapt teaching to meet identified needs. This contributes well to pupils’ progress. Teachers generally use the school’s ‘consequences’ procedure effectively and nip emerging misbehaviour in the bud. This contributes to the good environment for learning in classrooms and enables pupils to concentrate well and get on with their work. On a few occasions, with a few pupils, teachers are less successful in ensuring consistently good behaviour. Teachers’ good relationships with pupils engage them well and promote their learning. Teachers question pupils effectively to prompt thinking. On occasion, teachers miss opportunities to deepen understanding. In science, on occasion, the most able pupils lack sufficient challenge and do not develop a detailed understanding of high-level concepts. Teachers and well-trained teaching assistants support weaker readers well. Well-
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
planned extra reading lessons enable the weakest readers to improving their phonic skills and comprehension. One-to-one support accurately targets weaker aspects of pupils’ phonic knowledge. A reading mentoring programme for some average and most-able readers extends their vocabulary, comprehension and commitment to reading. Regular reading lessons promote reading well at key stage 3. However, the library is in a classroom and has a limited range of books. Subject teachers promote pupils’ literacy well. For example, in a physical education lesson, pupils constructed sentences well and learned to use accurate terminology. The school has identified the need to develop pupils’ extended writing at key stage 3. Teachers often use homework well to enable pupils to apply and consolidate their knowledge and understanding. In some cases, teachers’ confidence and skill in applying new techniques are developing. On occasion, teachers’ focus on completing the task misses opportunities
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
to deepen pupils’ knowledge, skill or understanding.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The rewards system promotes pupils’ personal development effectively. Pupils rise to the challenge of increasing their range of experience. Many are proud to wear the coloured badges to show what roles and responsibilities they have taken up. Well-targeted mentoring has led to good progress by low-attaining and disadvantaged pupils, in particular. Staff work effectively to meet the complex needs of vulnerable pupils, using a wide variety of support within the school and from outside agencies. Well-planned careers guidance from Years 7 to 11 increases pupils’ knowledge and aspiration. For example, in the week prior to the inspection, a group of Year 10 and Year 11 pupils visited Cambridge University. Independent careers advice from an external provider adds value to what the school is doing. Staff plan further developments at key stage 3, with stronger links with business and more training for
p.6
Personal development and welfare
teachers. Staff have strengthened advice and guidance for more vulnerable pupils who might otherwise have stayed in the sixth form. The take-up of apprenticeships has increased. Adults convey clear messages about the negative effect of bullying. Pupils talk confidently about bullying and can explain different types, including homophobic and cyber bullying. Openly gay pupils are accepted by other pupils. Pupils, parents and staff say that pupils are safe. Pupils have a good understanding of being safe online. They know how to respond to visitors in school according to the colour of their lanyard. The curriculum provides good opportunities for pupils to explore different cultures, faiths and communities. Enrichment activities provide pupils with good opportunities to interact with people from different cultural backgrounds. The very few, mainly part-time, pupils at alternative providers benefit from a wide
p.6
Personal development and welfare
menu of learning and enterprise activities and qualifications. Most gain useful accreditation and vocational experience. Staff receive regular reports on their progress and make regular visits to check the quality of provision.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good in classrooms and around school. In lessons, pupils typically work hard, concentrate on the task and collaborate well. They listen to each other with respect and enjoy learning from each other as well as the teacher. Pupils are polite and welcoming to visitors. They show pride in their uniform and their school. Conduct is orderly on the way to lessons and assembly and pupils arrive punctually. The atmosphere is calm at break and lunchtime. Staggered breaks and lunches minimise opportunities for incidents. Pupils welcome the ‘consequences’ system and say it has significantly reduced low- level disruption in lessons. A few pupils have not come to terms with the higher expectations and their non-compliant behaviour has led to a higher level of exclusions. The number of repeat exclusions is beginning to reduce as pupils accept the new rules, but the rate of exclusions is high at present. Staff are skilled in de-escalating behaviour
p.6
Behaviour
incidents when they occur. Staff coordinate their work well to improve attendance and deploy an appropriate range of strategies with pupils and their families. Nevertheless, attendance was below the national average and persistent absence was higher than average last school year.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
Pupils’ progress from their starting points at key stage 2 to their GCSEs in 2016 was significantly above average overall. Disadvantaged pupils made better progress than other pupils nationally. The progress pupils made in English, mathematics, science, humanities and modern foreign languages was broadly in line with all pupils nationally. Pupils of all abilities, including disadvantaged pupils, made particularly strong progress in performing arts, sports studies and information technology. Attainment was well above the national average in these subjects. Disadvantaged and low-ability pupils made good progress in mathematics and science. Disadvantaged pupils also did well in humanities. They did less well in English. The progress of the most able in English and mathematics was in line with the national average, but was significantly below average in science. Evidence is emerging of improving progress by the most able in science in the current Year 11.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
There were too few Year 11 most able disadvantaged pupils to evaluate their progress. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress due to the extra support that staff tailor well to meet their diverse range of needs. The school predicts that the current Year 11 is on track for at least half the pupils to reach the new GCSE grade 5 in English and mathematics in 2017. Leaders base this on tests taken in secondary schools across the Delta Academies Trust. Current Year 11 pupils are making strong progress from below-average starting points and outcomes are continuing to improve. The number who left school and were not in education, training and employment is low. The school prepares pupils well for the next stage of education, apprenticeship and training.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Principal Gareth Mason (Executive Principal) Christopher McCall (Associate Principal) Telephone number 01977 622850
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 12 February 2015
p.8
Information about this school
The school is in the Delta Academies Trust. In summer 2016, the School Partnership Trust Academies changed its name to Delta Academies Trust, under a new chief executive officer and board of directors. The executive principal provides formal support to other schools in the Delta Academies Trust. The associate principal took up post in January 2017. In summer 2016, the small sixth form closed. The school is smaller than the average-sized secondary school. The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium is above average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below average. Most pupils are White British. A small number are from minority ethnic backgrounds. The school uses the following alternative providers for a very small number of pupils: The UCAN Centre, Skills Exchange and Action to Change. In 2016, the school met the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum
p.8
Information about this school
expectations for progress at the end of key stage 4. The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning in all years and subject areas. Observations were carried out jointly with senior leaders. Inspectors looked at pupils’ work, observed pupils reading and talked to them about their learning and their experiences at school. Discussions were held with the executive principal, senior and middle leaders, teachers, the chief executive officer of the trust, the regional director, the trust sixth form director, the chair and vice-chair of the education advisory board and groups of pupils. An inspector visited an alternative provider. Inspectors checked the school website and evaluated a wide range of school documents, including the school’s self-evaluation, information about pupils’ progress, and behaviour, attendance and safeguarding records. The inspection took account of 89 responses from parents, including a few written comments, 26 responses from staff and five responses from pupils to the Ofsted online
p.10
Inspection team
Bernard Campbell, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Lesley Powell Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion