Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Jan 2017
- Postcode verified
LE5 1GA
- Name on report verified
Gateway Sixth Form College
- URN verified
130755
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is the first reinspection monitoring visit to Gateway Sixth Form College following publication of the inspection report on 17 November 2016, which found the provider to be inadequate for overall effectiveness, leadership and management, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, outcomes for learners and personal development, behaviour and welfare. p.2
- Of the three provision types inspected, 16 to 19 study programmes were inadequate and traineeships and provision for learners with high needs required improvement. p.2
- Governors had failed to challenge and support senior leaders effectively during a period when standards had declined sharply. p.2
- There were two principal reasons for this: the quality of information supplied was not good enough, and too few governors had experience of education and were therefore unable to contribute effectively. p.2
- Inspectors reported that governance was ineffective. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Produce a smaller, more focused PIAP which identifies key actions likely to lead to substantial and rapid improvements. p.2
- Ensure that the senior leadership team share key actions immediately with programme area managers to enable them to work with their teams to bring about required changes and improvements. p.2
- Recruit one or more governors with appropriate expertise in teaching, learning and assessment. p.3
- Ensure that governors are provided with a clear analysis of the quality of teaching, learning, assessment and the progress of students so that they are able to support and challenge senior managers more effectively. p.3
- Focus governors’ meetings much more sharply on the quality of teaching, learning, assessment and the progress made by students. p.3
- Inspectors found that 16- to 18-year-old students made inadequate progress. p.3
- A number of issues contributed to this, including: low expectations from teachers, weak assessment within lessons, a lack of homework, insufficient feedback on marked work, a failure to use information about students’ prior attainment and progress to plan lessons, and progress coaches working only with those at risk of dropping out and not those who were failing to achieve their potential. p.3
- As a result, teachers often planned lessons aimed at the group as a whole and consequently the pace was too slow for some and the challenge too great for others. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 2,011
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Gateway Sixth Form College Re-inspection monitoring visit report
p.1
Address: Colin Grundy Drive Hamilton Leicester LE5 1GA Monitoring visit: Gateway Sixth Form College, 11–12 January 2017
p.1
Context and focus of visit
This is the first reinspection monitoring visit to Gateway Sixth Form College following publication of the inspection report on 17 November 2016, which found the provider to be inadequate for overall effectiveness, leadership and management, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, outcomes for learners and personal development, behaviour and welfare. Of the three provision types inspected, 16 to 19 study programmes were inadequate and traineeships and provision for learners with high needs required improvement.
p.2
monitoring and reporting arrangements and the rigour of senior leaders’
A comprehensive post-inspection action plan (PIAP), based on the eight improvement actions identified in the previous inspection report, has been developed and discussed with governors and senior managers. Detailed position papers, focused on each of the improvement actions, are being prepared to provide more clarity to actions taken and their impact. Quality monitoring meetings have been reintroduced to focus on specific actions and activities within the PIAP.
p.2
monitoring and reporting arrangements and the rigour of senior leaders’
The PIAP is a large document that identifies 32 issues and circa 143 detailed actions and targets. Although there is a clear correspondence between the issues and the eight improvement actions, the vast majority of actions have a high priority. In its current form the PIAP is unlikely to lead to rapid improvements.
p.2
Priorities for improvement
Produce a smaller, more focused PIAP which identifies key actions likely to lead to substantial and rapid improvements. Ensure that the senior leadership team share key actions immediately with programme area managers to enable them to work with their teams to bring about required changes and improvements.
p.2
Actions to strengthen governance and governors’ knowledge of college
performance and the impact of their holding managers to account.
p.2
Actions to strengthen governance and governors’ knowledge of college
Inspectors reported that governance was ineffective. Governors had failed to challenge and support senior leaders effectively during a period when standards had declined sharply. There were two principal reasons for this: the quality of information supplied was not good enough, and too few governors had experience of education and were therefore unable to contribute effectively. Monitoring visit: Gateway Sixth Form College, 11–12 January 2017 Governors have arranged to visit a governing body of another sixth form college that has successfully negotiated the challenges posed by a poor inspection outcome. This is intended to allow governors to learn from their experiences.
p.2
Actions to strengthen governance and governors’ knowledge of college
Governors acknowledge an improvement in the information available to them, particularly through the introduction of a governors’ data dashboard. Further work to ensure appropriate, aggregated and analysed data to help them understand the progress made by students is in progress. Governors and senior leaders have begun the search for two governors with education backgrounds who can improve the holding of staff to good account. The planned changes to the structure of committees will allow a clearer focus on the progress of students.
p.3
Priorities for improvement
Recruit one or more governors with appropriate expertise in teaching, learning and assessment. Ensure that governors are provided with a clear analysis of the quality of teaching, learning, assessment and the progress of students so that they are able to support and challenge senior managers more effectively. Focus governors’ meetings much more sharply on the quality of teaching, learning, assessment and the progress made by students.
p.3
students’ needs and challenging them to make good progress and achieve
Inspectors found that 16- to 18-year-old students made inadequate progress. A number of issues contributed to this, including: low expectations from teachers, weak assessment within lessons, a lack of homework, insufficient feedback on marked work, a failure to use information about students’ prior attainment and progress to plan lessons, and progress coaches working only with those at risk of dropping out and not those who were failing to achieve their potential. As a result, teachers often planned lessons aimed at the group as a whole and consequently the pace was too slow for some and the challenge too great for others.
p.3
students’ needs and challenging them to make good progress and achieve
Senior leaders have reduced the number of directors of study from three to two, giving these two post-holders a clearer focus on aspects of provision that caused concern during the inspection. One post has a focus on improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment and the other has a focus on study programmes, including work-related learning and work experience. The purpose of these cross- college roles is to provide greater clarity and lead to improved outcomes for students.
p.3
students’ needs and challenging them to make good progress and achieve
Staff have attended a training event to consider carefully the expectations that they have of their students, including their target grades, attendance, punctuality and completion of homework. As a consequence, teachers have increased their focus on Monitoring visit: Gateway Sixth Form College, 11–12 January 2017 approaches to assessment, individualised learning and the extent to which they challenge all students to achieve their potential. A handbook to make these expectations explicit will be available shortly.
p.3
students’ needs and challenging them to make good progress and achieve
To support these initiatives, the lesson observation process will focus on the key themes outlined above. In addition, teachers now formally report the progress of their students at five points during the year, to allow managers to intervene where this is insufficient. The work of progress coaches now includes support for learners who have fallen behind their academic targets rather than just those at risk of leaving the college altogether.
p.4
students’ needs and challenging them to make good progress and achieve
Managers are planning a staff training day in February 2017, in which assessment and feedback will be the dominant theme. The new professional development plan includes events to reinforce these themes throughout the year.
p.4
Priorities for improvement
Ensure that teachers set and mark sufficient work to allow them to develop a good understanding of the progress their students are making. Undertake scrutiny of assessed work to ensure that the tasks are appropriate, and that feedback is helpful and contributes to increased student progress. Ensure that lesson observations focus on learning and progress and that teachers modify their approach to reflect the learning needs of all their students. Ensure that teachers frequently review student progress against target grades. Identify those subjects in which there is little impact of improvement actions and work closely with individual teachers to improve their practice. Monitor the work of progress coaches to ensure they set useful targets and review these frequently. Check the effectiveness of this work on the progress of students.
p.4
stakeholders to increase the number of students who participate in
One of the strengths referred to in the inspection report is the good relationships that exist between the college and a broad range of organisations and businesses including the local enterprise board. However, the college does not make good use of these relationships to increase the number of students who participate in work- related learning and meaningful work experience. Consequently, too few students, especially those on vocational programmes, participate in work experience or other work-related learning.
p.4
stakeholders to increase the number of students who participate in
A review of the college provision has identified subject areas that need greater exploration to provide relevant and appropriate work experience. A recently developed three-year action plan recognises the need to set targets for each year in order to achieve improvements. For example, it is expected that the current number Monitoring visit: Gateway Sixth Form College, 11–12 January 2017 of work placements will be doubled in 2017/18 in order that eventually all level 2 and level 3 students will undertake work experience during the course of their study programmes.
p.4
stakeholders to increase the number of students who participate in
A work experience and employability strategy is to be coordinated across the college through the director of studies and the employer engagement coordinator. They will work with programme area managers, teachers and coaches to ensure consistent implementation of the strategy and that other initiatives, such as the introduction of short employability qualifications, speakers from industry and visits and the use of appropriate internal work placements, happen.
p.5
Priorities for improvement
Ensure that the work experience and employability strategy leads to an increase in the number of students who participate in meaningful work-related learning and work experience, particularly for those on vocational programmes.
p.5
curriculum is appropriate and students are prepared well for further study
During the inspection, managers struggled to provide a clear analysis of the destinations of their former students. In many cases, there was no information available to indicate what had become of students once they left the college. As a result, managers were unable to state with any certainty whether the courses they followed were suitable or whether teaching, learning and assessment had prepared them well for their next steps in education or employment.
p.5
curriculum is appropriate and students are prepared well for further study
Managers have developed new systems for gathering the intended destinations of students to ensure that they are enrolled on appropriate study programmes and that their programme continues to match their career aspirations. This includes capturing information during pre-enrolment interviews, revisiting it during enrolment and reviewing it several times a year. They have considered the most appropriate ways to capture and analyse actual destinations of students but have not yet applied these systems.
p.5
Priorities for improvement
Gather information on the destinations of those students who left the college in the summer of 2016. Analyse whether students progressed to destinations that matched their aspirations and course choices, and consider whether they were well prepared to make a successful transition to further study or employment. Monitor the implementation of new systems to ensure that students continue to follow programmes that are relevant to their intended destinations. Implement fully the new destinations monitoring processes. Monitoring visit: Gateway Sixth Form College, 11–12 January 2017
p.5
Actions taken to improve students’ attendance and punctuality through
improved and consistent support arrangements.
p.6
Actions taken to improve students’ attendance and punctuality through
Inspectors noted that students’ attendance was too low and improvement actions had little impact. Many students arrived late to lessons and teachers failed to challenge them sufficiently. The attitudes associated with poor attendance did not prepare students well for employment.
p.6
Actions taken to improve students’ attendance and punctuality through
The reintroduced quality monitoring sessions have focused on checking the accuracy and consistency of registration in order to provide the management dashboard with more robust data. As a result, more accurate attendance data is available to managers, providing them with a better understanding of current attendance.
p.6
Actions taken to improve students’ attendance and punctuality through
The involvement of parents and carers, non-teaching staff and the appointment of additional progress coaches now encompasses a more holistic approach to the issue of poor attendance. Students have been made aware of the process for late arrival in a class. Senior leaders are also involved directly with at-risk students and meet with them to discuss a range of issues.
p.6
Priorities for improvement
Continue to improve attendance and punctuality by monitoring the impact of recent initiatives and adjusting approaches as necessary. Establish a culture of high attendance and punctuality from the outset and ensure that students are aware of these expectations. Monitoring visit: Gateway Sixth Form College, 11–12 January 2017 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Priorities for improvement
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Priorities for improvement
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to
p.7
Priorities for improvement
the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Priorities for improvement
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Priorities for improvement
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion