Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Clement's High School

Inspected 19 Jan 2017 · published 21 Feb 2017 · URN 140557

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jan 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Carole Herman, John Wilson, Kim Pigram

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PE34 4LZ

  • Name on report verified

    St Clement’s High School

  • URN verified

    140557

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivestronghigh-qualitycaringmake good progresspositivehappy
Criticismnot effectivepersistent absenceconcernsnot yetpoorweaknessesnot securenot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1917w+47
  • Leadership756w+45
  • Safeguarding223w+60
  • What needs to improve107w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,936
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 20%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

St Clement’s High School Churchgate Way, Terrington St Clement, King’s Lynn, Norfolk PE34 4LZ

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The diligent headteacher embodies the ethos of St Clement’s High School: calm, caring and aspirational. He and his team have transformed the culture of the school. Consequently, teaching, learning, achievement and behaviour are all now securely good.  Pupils make good progress. In 2016, the overall progress made by pupils in Year 11 was above the national average. Pupils performed particularly well in English, humanities, art, drama and photography.  Disadvantaged pupils make progress that is in line with the national average. In a number of subjects, the least able disadvantaged pupils make particularly strong progress, including in English and humanities.  Most teaching, learning and assessment is good. Leaders have worked creatively, alongside the trust, to recruit, train and ‘grow’ their own staff. This counters the difficulties of recruiting in the area.  The trust’s proactive and ‘hands on’ approach

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

to the school’s development has been effective in facilitating the significant improvements that have been made at the school since it opened.  Most pupils are articulate, polite and respectful young people who appreciate the efforts of their staff. Pupils enjoy the atmosphere of the small, caring community. Diversity is welcomed and embraced in the school.  The curriculum offers pupils breadth in their experiences. Leaders ensure that pupils’ needs and aspirations come first when deciding on their provision.  The support for pupils who arrive in Year 7 is a strength of the school. The efforts that staff make to induct and support new pupils is highly regarded by many parents.  Most parents are very positive about the school. They particularly rate the high-quality pastoral care and communication that they receive.  Pupils are kept safe at the school. However, the administration around some aspects of the

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

school’s safeguarding practice does not reflect the effective work that takes place.  There is still some less effective teaching that does not facilitate good learning for pupils.  Pupils from middle prior attaining starting points, including the small number of disadvantaged pupils, are not making consistently good progress in mathematics and science.  Despite continued efforts by leaders, the attendance and persistent absence for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, and disadvantaged pupils, is not yet at national average.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that the administration of documentation around safeguarding reflects the effective practice in the school, and that governors undertake more rigorous checks on the quality of this aspect of the school’s work.  Continue to improve the quality of teaching and achievement, most notably in mathematics and science, especially for middle prior attainers, including those who are disadvantaged, so that progress is more rapid to raise pupils’ level of attainment.  Increase the attendance, and reduce the persistent absence, of disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, so that it is at least in line with the national average for all pupils.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Leaders, governors and staff collectively have raised the quality of provision in the school since it opened in February 2014. The historic low performance, and poor pupil behaviour, of the predecessor school are in the past. Achievement, teaching, learning and behaviour are now securely good.  The headteacher’s resolute commitment to the pupils in his community is acknowledged by many pupils and parents. He has focused on getting the basics right; improving the learning environment, ensuring his staff model core values of respect and courtesy, and raising the quality of teaching and learning. As a result, the school is a welcoming and vibrant place, where happy pupils are developing into caring young adults.  The trust has been instrumental in the school’s improvement. The trust’s passion, and dedication to the school, is evident in its constant work to support leaders to raise standards. For example, recruitment remains a challenge for the school, but the trust’s

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

executive headteacher works tenaciously with the other schools in the trust to see where mutual support can be provided. Consequently, although recruitment is a persistent issue, the trust provides the capacity that the school needs to continue to provide a broad curriculum.  Leaders and trust advisers are rightly proud of the culture of ‘in house’ training among the academies in the trust. Middle and senior leaders are supported to ‘grow’ into new roles and positions. Subject leaders undertake cross-school moderation in preparation for the new GCSE syllabuses. Leadership at all levels is strong and improving.  Leaders have created a curriculum which allows pupils to access breadth in their studies. Pupils achieve well in a variety of subjects. In particular, leaders have used the additional Year 7 catch-up funding to ensure that pupils who enter the school with lower standards of attainment begin to catch up with their classmates, especially in

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

their basic literacy skills.  Leaders and staff promote the importance of inclusion through the curriculum, and in their actions. Pupils are taught in lessons, and around the school, about what it is to be a caring and respectful citizen, and the importance of diversity in British society. As a result, people’s differences are recognised and celebrated at St Clement’s High School.  Leaders have used the additional funding they receive for disadvantaged pupils effectively, to raise achievement and aspiration. Leaders use funds for basic equipment, small-group tuition and additional lessons. Leaders also provide additional financial support to disadvantaged pupils so they access educational trips, for example to Berlin to enhance their studies in history. Most disadvantaged pupils are now aspiring to achieve more in their future, and going on to post-16 destinations in education, training or employment.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 The knowledgeable leader for special educational needs is ensuring that funding is being used effectively constantly to review and revise the provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Many parents commented positively about the support for their child’s needs. The leader is using reviews to develop even sharper guidance to staff about practical classroom strategies that would help pupils learn even more effectively.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governors know the strengths and weaknesses in the school’s provision. Governors come from a range of professional backgrounds. They use their expertise to question school leaders about the effectiveness of their actions. The local governing body works collaboratively with the trust, and the senior team, to ensure that they have a good understanding of the work of leaders and staff in the school.  Governors ask challenging questions of the senior team, especially about the achievement, attendance and behaviour of pupils. They visit the school regularly to liaise with their link department areas. Governors use the information that they gather on their visits to confirm the information that they receive from the senior team. They check on the effectiveness of the spending of the additional funding that they receive, and have identified that the middle-attaining disadvantaged pupils in mathematics are

p.4

Governance of the school

a key focus for 2016/17.  Governors undertake routine reviews of the single central record of staff recruitment to ensure that the school is undertaking all of the statutory checks when recruiting staff. They participate in regular training so that they are clear on their responsibilities, and ensure that staff are having regular and updated training on child protection and safeguarding. They also ensure that an annual safeguarding audit is undertaken and act quickly on any issues identified as requiring improvement. On occasion, though, their checks on the administration of some of the safeguarding practice in the school are not precise enough.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The single central record of checks on staff is appropriate. Staff files are well maintained with the associated paperwork. The appointments of staff meet all statutory requirements.  The work of the designated safeguarding leaders and pastoral team ensures that pupils receive timely, and effective, support from a range of different external and internal services where required, such as family liaison support work.  Staff are well trained in the most up-to-date guidance, including ‘Prevent’, which focuses on preventing pupils becoming vulnerable to radicalisation and extremism. Staff make appropriate referrals to the designated safeguarding team, and feel confident to follow up their referrals if they remain concerned about a pupil’s well- being.  Pupils are taught how to stay safe, both online and in the wider world. They access a number of lessons, such as citizenship, and assemblies, which give additional guidance

p.4

Safeguarding

about the dangers of sexting and child sexual exploitation. Pupils say that they feel safe, and that there are staff who they can go to when they are worried about things.  Some of the administration around safeguarding does not reflect the effective practice in the school, for example the school’s safeguarding policy. Leaders acknowledge that checks of the school’s administration of some of its paperwork need to be more precise and routine.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Most teaching, learning and assessment is good, with some that is especially strong.  Staff have worked with other schools in the trust on cross-school marking and moderation. This is helping teachers to quality assure and check that their judgements about pupils’ achievement are accurate and rigorous. Teachers use this understanding to give precise advice and guidance to pupils about how to improve their work.  Most teachers use assessment information, and a thorough understanding of their subjects, to plan lessons over time that help pupils to build on their prior learning. For example, in a Year 10 geography lesson, pupils were asked to use their learning from the previous lessons and apply it to make a decision about the positives and negatives of the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games. This was particularly helping the most able pupils in the class to revise their knowledge and apply it to an examination question in the

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

lead-up to a test.  Teachers use questions effectively, encouraging pupils to explain their reasons for their answers. For example, in a Year 7 history lesson pupils were being asked to use an array of evidence to decide whether life in the middle ages was fun. The whole lesson was focused on pupils using their prior knowledge to answer this question, and make an overall judgement about an aspect of medieval life.  Pupils are encouraged to read, both in lessons and out of school. The most able and least able pupils who read to inspectors did so with fluency and confidence. Small- group and one-to-one tuition is helping the least able pupils to gain basic skills in reading and comprehension. This is supporting their learning across the curriculum. In particular, the least able pupils are being supported to structure written work very effectively, especially in English and humanities. Consequently, the quality of extended

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

written work is becoming increasingly effective for these pupils.  Teachers plan effectively for the different needs of pupils in their lessons. For example, the communication between teaching assistants and teachers is ensuring that those pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, and less able pupils, receive timely intervention in lessons to ensure that they learn effectively.  Teachers are using the school’s marking and feedback policy to give clear guidance to pupils about what they need to do in order to improve their work.  Staff who are new to the profession are well supported. These staff appreciate the support that they receive to plan for pupils’ specific needs. They are confident in the guidance that they receive, to teach with increasing effectiveness.  Some less effective teaching, in the rare instances where it exists, does not plan precisely or well enough for pupils’ different needs in lessons. Most notably, in some

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

mathematics and science lessons, planning and activities are not secure enough in ensuring that pupils deepen their knowledge, or develop new skills quickly enough.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Many pupils and parents comment on the high-quality pastoral care provided at the school. Parents report particularly on the excellent communication from the pastoral team when they raise concerns, or need help or guidance. Pupils feel that staff are vigilant and dedicated to helping them. Pupils said that staff ‘go the extra mile’ to support their academic and personal needs.  Year 7 pupils, and their parents, commented on the high-quality transition and induction that they receive when they first join the school. This is well-organised and systematic work with primary-aged pupils in the community and beyond. This is a real strength in the school’s provision and is ensuring that pupils are confident and happy to start at the school.  Pupils are being given increasing opportunities to have a voice in the way that the

p.5

Personal development and welfare

school runs. A significant proportion of pupils are proactive members of the school council. This articulate and thoughtful group of young people meet with staff and leaders to represent the ideas of pupils in the school.  Children looked after are happy and attend well. They are supported academically and socially, which ensures that they make friends and attend well. Their safeguarding and well-being is monitored effectively. Leaders have identified that further work to ensure that these pupils have an active voice in how their funding is allocated would further enhance this positive experience.  While safeguarding is effective and pupils are safe, some of the administration around safeguarding is not as sharp or precise as it could be, and does not fully reflect the effective practice in the school. One example is the safeguarding policy and staff code of conduct, which does not always reflect the very specific and unique context of the

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Leaders have put extensive thought and effort into developing the site since it opened, to ensure that it provides a welcoming learning environment for pupils and visitors. Leaders have invested in much-needed redecoration. They also ensure that the celebrations of pupils’ work and achievements are regularly updated to reflect what pupils are currently achieving. The school is a vibrant place that welcomes pupils through its doors.  The passion of leaders, staff and the trust is evident in both their work around the school and in the commentary from pupils. Pupils commented that ‘The best thing about this school is the staff; they make the school what it is.’ In particular, older pupils are glowing in their praise for the headteacher, and for the ‘transformation’ in the school since it opened, especially in behaviour and teaching.  Staff promote positive relationships. Most pupils follow their example in the way they

p.6

Behaviour

treat each other and staff in the school. Consequently, the school’s use of fixed-term exclusion and permanent exclusion is now reducing, as are the numbers of concerns about pupils’ behaviour within the school.  Published information about the attendance and persistent absence of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities indicates that this is not yet at national average. Leaders, the trust and governors have made this a priority focus for 2016/17. There is clear evidence that the strategies employed by leaders are starting to have an impact on individual pupils.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Results in 2015 and 2016 showed continued improvements in the quality of outcomes for pupils.  In almost all year groups, pupils enter the school with levels of attainment that are significantly lower than those expected for their age. From this low starting point, pupils’ overall achievement in Year 11, in 2016, was broadly in line with the national average. Consequently, pupils made better overall progress at St Clement’s High School than did pupils nationally.  In 2016, pupils achieved well in a range of subjects. In English and humanities pupils’ achievement overall was above the national average. Pupils also made rapid progress and achieved well in a number of non-core subjects such as art, photography and drama. Pupils’ overall progress in science and mathematics was broadly in line with the national average.  In 2016, disadvantaged pupils in Year 11 made progress that was broadly in line with

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

other pupils nationally from their various starting points. This is a clear improvement in the achievement of these pupils over time. However, in science, disadvantaged pupils’ progress was below the national average, especially for the very small numbers who were least able.  The percentage of pupils who achieved a good pass in English and mathematics rose in 2015. This fell slightly in 2016, as a result of a dip in mathematics attainment. However, leaders have identified that the quality of teaching, and standards for middle prior attaining pupils, is an area for improvement, and features heavily in their current development planning and strategies.  The progress of pupils who had special educational needs and/or disabilities, in 2016, was broadly in line with the national average. The numbers of pupils with a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan are very small in

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

each cohort, so it is not possible to report on their achievement without identifying individual pupils.  The most able pupils make good progress and attain well, most notably in English, humanities, science and an array of non-core subjects. This means that their attainment is broadly in line with the national average for the most able pupils. There were no high prior attaining disadvantaged pupils in Year 11 in 2016 to report on. However, there are no discernible differences between the achievement of the very small proportion of high-attaining disadvantaged pupils currently in the school, and their classmates who started the school with similar attainment.  Improvements in the achievement of pupils and in the quality of information, advice and guidance, are ensuring that pupils are securing better destinations for their post- 16 provision. The numbers of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, who are

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

accessing higher education, training or employment are rising, and likely to be above the national average.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Email address office@stclementshigh.org.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.8

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish.  This is a smaller than average school. The numbers on roll have been increasing year on year for the last three years, and it is nearly at full capacity.  The school opened in February 2014 under the sponsorship of the West Norfolk Academies Trust (WNAT). The predecessor school was in special measures.  The proportion of pupils who are eligible for the additional funding (pupil premium) is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below the national average.  The school meets the current minimum government floor standards for achievement.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors undertook learning walks and observations in 25 lessons. Some of these lessons were observed jointly with senior leaders. Inspectors also visited a tutor time and an assembly. Inspectors also undertook a work scrutiny of pupils across the five year groups in a range of their subjects.  Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, executive headteacher/chief executive officer of the trust, a number of trust advisers, senior leaders, middle leaders, the chair of the trust, and the chair of the local governing body.  Inspectors reviewed a range of school documentation, including that relating to safeguarding, site safety, achievement, attendance and behaviour.  Inspectors reviewed 49 parental responses on Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents during the inspection, including the free text commentary. Inspectors also reviewed 16 pupil survey results, and 34 staff survey results. Inspectors also reviewed the school’s

p.9

Information about this inspection

own surveys. Inspectors met with a number of pupils formally and spoke to pupils in lessons and around the school.  Inspectors observed pupils’ arrival to the school, and their conduct at break and lunch, as well as between lessons.

p.9

Inspection team

Kim Pigram, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

John Wilson Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion