Social care · Social care interim inspection
Children's Home run by Cambian Childcare Limited in Wolverhampton
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
31 Jan 2017
- Inspectors verified
Lisa Walsh
- Postcode verified
W6 9RU
- URN verified
SC359846
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The absence of a permanent long-term manager has created feelings of instability in the staff team, and staff morale has declined as a result. p.2
- This compromised the protection of young people and staff. p.2
- Managers also ensured that the staff team received specialist training to meet each young person’s needs; this is with specific reference to supporting young people who were at risk of sexual exploitation. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health3
“This means that young people’s safety and well-being were prioritised.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 737
- about usual (typical 904)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
This home was judged requires improvement at the full inspection. At this interim inspection, the home was ‘not judged’ .
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
At the time of this inspection, there were no young people living in the home. Since the last inspection in May 2016, nine young people have lived at the home. Young people’s experiences at the home have been varied. Some improved significantly, whereas others have had their placements terminated on an emergency basis because of external influences, which have led to criminalisation.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
The home has had two managers in post since the last inspection. Both of these managers have left. A new manager has recently been appointed. The absence of a permanent long-term manager has created feelings of instability in the staff team, and staff morale has declined as a result. This has led to a decrease in confidence in some staff practice and abilities. For example, staff have become over-reliant on the manager’s instructions and this has created some unnecessary delays in staff taking action.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Since the last inspection, staff and young people have been through a challenging time. There have been incidents of substance misuse, young people going missing, and extremely challenging behaviours. The staff team has implemented safeguarding procedures in an attempt to address the risks. Managers have actively challenged other agencies when safeguarding concerns have been raised. The manager’s action has ensured that young people have been better protected. Strong relationships with the police and local authorities were used to protect young people from further harm.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Shortfalls in the referral process have meant that vital information was not being shared with the manager and staff by a local authority when placing a young person in the home. This compromised the protection of young people and staff. For example, insufficient information was shared with the manager around risk- taking behaviours. This resulted in the manager accepting the admission of a young person without being able to carry out a rigorous risk assessment that took into account historic risk-taking behaviour. This meant that staff were not sufficiently informed and were hindered in their capacity to meet the young person’s needs. Managers have recognised this shortfall in practice and have taken effective action. They have developed an information-gathering tool to assist with decision making for future admissions. This means that future admissions will be subject to much more scrutiny and consideration.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Managers have successfully addressed all of the requirements and recommendations made at the full inspection. This has seen improvements in how staff help young people to express their views and wishes, with adaptions made to the format of house meetings. There have also been improvements in how staff engage with partner agencies, in particular the fire service. All staff have been trained in fire awareness. Young people engaged in a workshop led by the fire service, which supported them to recognise the significance of fire safety. This means that young people’s safety and well-being were prioritised.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
The quality of key work has improved since the last inspection. A refocusing of supervision and training now means that staff have the skills and knowledge to be able to discuss complex issues and help young people to recognise potential risks. Key working sessions had a clear focus on the young person’s specific needs, including, when required, covering sensitive topics such as healthy relationships and sexual health. All young people have participated in house meetings. Young people have had the support to understand how decisions were made and the degree to which they were able to influence them. Complaints were rare, and when raised were swiftly examined with young people receiving a response.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Partnership working with other agencies has been key in helping some young people to make good levels of progress educationally, socially and emotionally. The staff were successful in reintegrating some of most resistant of young people back into education. This helped young people to start to see the importance of education for their future.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Young people’s health needs were promoted and reviewed. For example, the staff ensured that young people had access to children and adolescent mental health services. Managers also ensured that the staff team received specialist training to meet each young person’s needs; this is with specific reference to supporting young people who were at risk of sexual exploitation.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Incidents of restraint were low and only conducted when necessary. Records of such incidents were completed well, supporting the safety of young people and staff.
p.3
Information about this children’s home
The home is one of a group of homes operated by the same organisation. The home provides care and accommodation for up to five young people who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.4
Recent inspection history
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 03/05/2016 Full Requires improvement 27/01/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 10/06/2015 Full Requires improvement 06/01/2015 Interim Declined in effectiveness
p.4
What the inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children’s home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference that adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Information about this inspection
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for children looked after and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.6
Information about this inspection
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Information about this inspection
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Information about this inspection
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion