Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Elemore Hall School

Inspected 19 Jan 2017 · published 9 Feb 2017 · URN 114337

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Belita Scott (lead), Fiona Dixon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jan 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Belita Scott, Fiona Dixon

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DH6 1QD

  • Name on report verified

    Elemore Hall School

  • URN verified

    114337

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrongrapid progressknowledgeablehighly skilledconsistentlyimprovedsuccessful
Criticismrequires improvementlackweakpersistently absentpoorslowshortcomingstoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings725w−12
  • Leadership139w−29
  • Safeguarding107w−21
  • What needs to improve1367w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,273
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 44%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Elemore Hall School Pittington, Durham DH6 1QD

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils do not make sufficient progress from their individual starting points in the key subject areas of English, mathematics and science.  Teachers do not have high enough expectations of their pupils. They do not plan work that enables pupils to make rapid academic progress and catch up with age- related expectations.  Teachers do not ensure that pupils apply their knowledge of spelling, punctuation and grammar consistently across all subjects.  Despite effective work with some individual pupils and their families, pupils’ absence and persistent absence remain too high.  Senior leaders do not analyse the type and frequency of behavioural incidents with sufficient rigour. This impedes their effectiveness in improving pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning.  Leaders have not ensured that teachers’ assessment of pupils’ attainment and progress are robust.  Subject leaders, although willing and keen, are

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

inexperienced at checking pupils’ workbooks and judging progress rigorously.  Leaders’ planning for school improvement is weak. Governors are unable to evaluate the school’s progress precisely because of a lack of targets and timescales.  Leaders have not reviewed and updated the school’s website and some policies and procedures in a timely manner. As a result, many are out of date.  Governors do not ask for sufficient information about pupils’ attainment and progress. They are unaware of, and therefore do not challenge, pupils’ academic achievements in Years 7 to 10.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 There is effective provision for music and drama. Pupils perform with confidence in front of large audiences.  The school’s provision of extra-curricular activities is strong. Many pupils attend activities until 8pm on school days.  Pupils, through the work of the junior leadership team, contribute well to key decisions made by senior leaders.  Parents are well informed about their child’s progress through well-written and comprehensive termly reports.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the progress made by pupils in all subjects, but particularly in English, mathematics and science, by teachers: – having higher expectations of what pupils can achieve – planning activities which enable pupils to make rapid progress and catch up for learning time lost through absence in this or a previous school – ensuring that pupils apply their knowledge of spelling, punctuation and grammar in all subject areas as a matter of course – developing assessment systems and practices that are used consistently.  Improve pupils’ attendance and reduce the number of pupils who are persistently absent.  Rapidly improve the effectiveness and impact of leaders at all levels by: – ensuring that the school’s website, policies and procedures are regularly updated to reflect current guidelines – implementing effective plans for school improvement which identify clearly how, when and by whom progress will be measured

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

– strengthening leaders’ knowledge of pupils’ progress overall by taking their end of key stage 2 assessments into account, as well as their attainment on entry to Elemore Hall – analysing the frequency of all types of behavioural incidents and providing full details to the governing body on a regular basis.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders have not ensured that pupils make sufficient progress from their starting points at the end of key stage 2, or from their baseline assessments carried out on entry to the school. Successful actions taken by leaders to quicken pupils’ progress in English have not been taken in other subject areas, including mathematics and science.  Leaders do not have the very highest expectations of pupils’ attainment and progress. There is little urge and determination for pupils to reach the standards expected for their age during their time at this special provision. Leaders measuring pupils’ progress from entry to the school and not from their starting points at the end of key stage 2 exemplify this. This process means that leaders, including governors, are disappointed when the school’s end of key stage 4 assessment data is published and shows poor progress.  Leaders observe teachers in their classrooms informally on a daily basis. Their feedback

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

to staff is not focused tightly on pinpointing strengths and areas for further development. It does not lead to pupils making better progress.  Subject leadership requires development. Leaders concentrate on their own subject areas. They do not share best practice and learn from each other. Subject leaders’ feedback following a scrutiny of pupils’ workbooks undertaken during the inspection concentrated on compliance with marking and assessment procedures. They did not consider pupils’ all-important attainment and progress until prompted.  Leaders have been slow to develop and implement a new assessment regime. Teachers in all subjects, except for English, still assess pupils’ attainment and progress using the old national curriculum levels. These levels are no longer appropriate because they do not match the increased demands of the key stage 3 and key stage 4 national curriculum.  The range of subjects offered by the school is strong and aimed at encouraging

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

disaffected pupils back into education and learning. For example, pupils enjoy ‘bushcraft’ and thrive during these practical and exciting lessons. The formal curriculum is underpinned extremely well by a wide range of extra-curricular activities that are timetabled from the end of the school day until 8pm in the evenings.  The provision for music and drama is strong and very well resourced. Pupils make good academic progress in the performing arts. They also grow in confidence and can perform well in front of large audiences. For example, their recent performance of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ at the Gala Theatre in Durham merited a standing ovation from the full house.  The programme to develop cultural awareness is effective and covers a wide range of topics, showing how the school raises pupils’ awareness of key issues locally and in the wider global community. For example, pupils are interested in and knowledgeable

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

about current events such as the American presidential election and inauguration.  The coordinator for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities (SENCO) ensures that comprehensive records are kept and timely meetings are held with parents, carers and professionals. The provision ensures that the majority of pupils make progress socially and emotionally. However, there is not enough focus on pupils’ achievements academically and, as a result, progress is slower.  Local authority officers visit the school regularly to check the school’s procedures and records in relation to pupils’ behaviour. For example, the local authority confirmed that incidents of physical intervention are reducing over time. However, the local authority has an overgenerous view of the school’s overall effectiveness. The local authority agreed with senior leaders that the school’s outcomes were good even though not

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

enough pupils are making good progress from their starting points.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors are too accepting of information provided by the headteacher. They receive assessment data about the Year 11 GCSE cohort of pupils but have little knowledge of the attainment and progress of pupils in Years 7 to 10.  Governors do not challenge leaders effectively about the impact of the government’s additional funding for disadvantaged pupils and the Year 7 literacy and numeracy catch-up premium. They understand the impact of additional special educational needs funding on pupils’ social and emotional well-being, but do not challenge the impact on pupils’ progress, especially in the key areas of English, mathematics and science.  Governors do realise their need to challenge and support leaders. They do attend appropriate training and do have a list of questions that they can ask of leaders. These skills of questioning and probing need further development.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Staff, including the large number of support staff, understand how to keep pupils safe from harm and are aware of the signs of all forms of abuse.  Leaders work proactively with a wide range of external agencies to ensure pupils’ safety. Staff make child protection referrals appropriately and immediately. They fulfil their duty of care well.  Senior leaders, including governors, do not check the accuracy of the school’s recruitment checks often enough. They had not identified a number of administrative shortcomings on the school’s record of recruitment checks. These were rectified by the end of the inspection.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 There is a lack of stability in the mathematics department. A newly appointed substantive post holder will not take up post until Easter 2017. The pupils will have had at least three mathematics teachers by the end of the current academic year. As a result, pupils are not making sufficient progress in mathematics.  Teachers do not have high enough expectations of their pupils. They do not set work routinely which is at just the right level to ensure that individuals make good progress. For example, during the inspection, pupils in Year 7 and Year 10 were taught exactly the same content about the human digestive system.  Teaching in English is improving. The introduction of a new way of assessing pupils’ progress in English is proving beneficial. Pupils, although not making expected progress, are making better progress from their individual starting points, especially in reading.  Staff in the English department work hard to teach spelling, punctuation and grammar

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

rules. However, teachers in other subject areas do not build on this effective practice. There is no ‘whole-school’ determination to instil these essential skills. Pupils’ written work in ‘culture’ is marred by the number of uncorrected spelling errors.  Teaching in subjects such as music, drama, physical education (PE) and history is stronger. In these subjects, teachers aim high, provide engaging activities and, as a result, pupils are interested in their learning.  Careers education is strong and effective for Year 11 pupils. It is not as strong or purposeful in key stage 3.  Teachers and learning support assistants are highly skilled in managing pupils’ behaviour in lessons.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement.  Pupils understand what bullying is and can list the types of bullying that exist. They are confident that staff take action when alerted to incidents of bullying. However, pupils told inspectors that bullying, including racist name-calling, persists.  As identified by senior leaders, pupils (although growing in confidence) have not yet developed sufficient resilience. They find it hard to maintain their effort when work is challenging.  Pupils do not produce neat and well-presented work as a matter of course. The standard of their work is better in lessons delivered by teachers who have high expectations of them.  The school nurse visits weekly and provides effective advice and support in relation to issues such as healthy eating and sexual health. Four pupils signed up for a smoking cessation course during the inspection.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 Pupils understand how to stay safe online. They are knowledgeable about using privacy settings and keeping personal information out of the public domain.  The democratically elected members of the school’s junior leadership team make important decisions. For example, after consulting with pupils, they recently decided to introduce a school uniform.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  Pupils’ behaviour does not improve quickly enough following admittance to this specialist provision. Although reducing, there are still too many incidents of physical interventions over time.  Staff are not vigilant enough about pupils’ behaviour at break and lunchtimes. For example, they do not uphold school policy consistently and intervene to stop some pupils smoking on the school site.  Despite the work undertaken with individual pupils and their families, pupils’ attendance is not high enough. Too many pupils are persistently absent or abscond from school in the middle of the school day.  Staff use de-escalation strategies effectively to manage behaviour. The ‘morning meeting’ which takes place during the first ten minutes of each school day is particularly successful in settling pupils on entry into school and bringing staff and pupils together as a caring community.

p.5

Behaviour

 Staff liaise well with staff from Durham local authority’s personalised alternative curriculum centre (PACC). Staff from both settings are knowledgeable about pupils’ attendance, behaviour and achievements.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Over time, in the key subjects of English, mathematics and science, pupils have not made enough progress from their starting points.  A scrutiny of pupils’ workbooks and the school’s assessment information shows that pupils are beginning to make faster progress in English. Leaders agree that the school’s most able pupils are making the most rapid progress in English.  Across the school, pupils are currently making much less progress in mathematics. Progress is particularly slow for the pupils with middle prior attainment.  The proportion of pupils who achieve five good-quality GCSE passes, including English and mathematics, has declined year-on-year over time.  In 2016, none of the five pupils who achieved the expected level of attainment at the end of key stage 2 in English achieved the expected GCSE grade C at the end of key stage 4. Similarly, none of the 10 pupils who achieved a level 4 in mathematics

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

achieved the expected grade at the end of key stage 4.  Younger pupils with low prior ability in reading are making faster progress this year. They are able to answer simple reading comprehension questions correctly and are beginning to choose books to read for pleasure.  The school ensures that pupils achieve work-related qualifications in a wide range of areas including ‘Rockschool,’ preparation for work, mental health and nutrition.  The ‘transitions coordinator’ works proactively with a range of providers to ensure that all pupils access further education, training or employment when they leave the school.

p.6

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.7

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.7

School details

Email address elemore@durhamlearning.net

p.7

School details

Date of previous inspection 6–7 February 2013

p.7

Information about this school

 The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about charging and remissions, pupil premium, Year 7 catch-up premium, special educational needs and/or disabilities and governance on its website.  Elemore Hall School has planned places for 82 secondary-aged pupils who have an education, health and care (EHC) plan or a statement of special educational needs because of their social, emotional and mental health difficulties. Pupils join the school any time between Years 7 and 11.  The school offers day and extended day places to boys and girls, and weekly boarding places to boys only.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils, those eligible for support through pupil premium funding, is three times the national average. All of the key stage 4 leavers in 2015 and 2016 were disadvantaged.  The vast majority of pupils are of White British heritage and speak English as a first language.

p.7

Information about this school

 Six pupils attend off-site training at the personalised alternative curriculum centre, which is based at another Durham local authority special school.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited classrooms across a wide range of subjects in all year groups. Two observations, on the first day of the inspection, were carried out jointly with the deputy headteacher.  During visits to lessons, inspectors spoke with pupils and looked at their work to find out more about how well they were learning. The lead inspector read with two Year 7 pupils and two Year 8 pupils, and listened to Year 7 pupils reading during an English lesson.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school. Formal meetings were held with a group of key stage 3 pupils and a group of key stage 4 pupils.  Additional meetings were held with senior leaders, subject leaders, the chair of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. The lead inspector talked by telephone to a member of staff at Durham local authority’s personalised alternative curriculum centre.  Inspectors observed the work of the school more broadly and looked at a range of

p.9

Information about this inspection

documentation, including policies and the school’s improvement plan.  There were insufficient responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, to be taken into account. Inspectors considered the school’s own surveys of pupils’ and parents’ views.  The headteacher was absent from school during the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

Belita Scott, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

Fiona Dixon Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion