Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Waterside Primary School
Summary
Lucy English (lead), Christopher Crouch
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
18 Jan 2017
- Inspectors verified
Christopher Crouch, Lucy English
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SO45 6ET
- Name on report verified
Waterside Primary School
- URN verified
115899
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that school leaders use information about pupils’ achievement and attendance to systematically monitor and review the impact their actions are having. p.2
- They then need to refine these actions in the light of this self-evaluation. p.2
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that all groups of pupils, including the most able, disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, are able to make good or better progress over time. p.2
- Develop the curriculum to ensure that pupils develop a greater understanding of the world beyond the school and their role in modern British society. p.2
- Leaders did not predict, or take prompt enough action to overcome, a recent decline in standards in key stage 2. p.3
- This is because, until recently, their monitoring of pupils’ performance was not strong enough. p.3
- Tracking has improved but leaders are only now starting to use it to monitor and improve the outcomes for different groups of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and the most able. p.3
- School assessment systems are not used effectively enough to improve outcomes for pupils in all subjects and year groups. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance30
“Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement” p.1Reading & phonics13
“Pupils’ outcomes in phonics are strong.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 2,936
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Waterside Primary School Ashford Crescent, Hythe, Southampton, Hampshire SO45 6ET
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders have not evaluated the work of the school in sufficient depth. This means that they do not know which of their many strategies improve outcomes for pupils. Actions to improve pupils’ attendance are not yet effective, especially for disadvantaged pupils. Leaders do not fully evaluate the use of additional funding such as pupil premium funding. This means that they do not know what impact each action has. Tracking of pupils’ progress has not focused clearly enough on the performance of groups of pupils, for example the most able. Until recently, school leaders did not pick up poor progress quickly enough. Governors now challenge school leaders but need to be more rigorous when evaluating the impact of additional funding on pupils’ progress. Late implementation of national curriculum changes means that some pupils are still catching up with the more challenging work their teachers require of them. This is
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
particularly the case for the most able pupils in Years 5 and 6. In some year groups, disadvantaged pupils are underperforming compared with other pupils nationally. There is not enough focus on learning about the world beyond the school. Pupils’ understanding of modern British society is not developed effectively.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Early years provision is well planned and supports children’s learning and development. Pupils’ outcomes in phonics are strong. Pupils successfully apply their phonics skills when they read. The positive relationships between adults and pupils help to promote a culture of respect and courtesy in the school. Leaders and teachers know the strengths and weaknesses of individual pupils well. Pupils develop their leadership skills well through contributing to decisions about school rules and behaviour codes. Pupils learn to take responsibility for their learning and behaviour through the whole- school focus on resilience and determination.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that school leaders use information about pupils’ achievement and attendance to systematically monitor and review the impact their actions are having. They then need to refine these actions in the light of this self-evaluation. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that all groups of pupils, including the most able, disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, are able to make good or better progress over time. Improve pupils’ attendance. Develop the curriculum to ensure that pupils develop a greater understanding of the world beyond the school and their role in modern British society.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders did not predict, or take prompt enough action to overcome, a recent decline in standards in key stage 2. This is because, until recently, their monitoring of pupils’ performance was not strong enough. Tracking has improved but leaders are only now starting to use it to monitor and improve the outcomes for different groups of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged and the most able. School assessment systems are not used effectively enough to improve outcomes for pupils in all subjects and year groups. Leaders track pupils’ progress individually and do not have a clear understanding of the trends between different groups, for example those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. This means that they are not able to identify ways to secure better outcomes for these pupils. School improvement plans do not all have clear targets linked to actions. As a result, leaders find it difficult to judge whether plans have been successful. Many of the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
school’s interventions and projects are not included in these plans and similarly do not have success criteria attached. School leaders have identified pupils’ emotional well-being as a key area to support, especially for disadvantaged pupils. Leaders have much anecdotal evidence about the positive impact of this work, which is partly funded by the additional pupil premium funding. However, as with much of the school’s work, the impact of these activities on pupils’ progress is not systematically reviewed or evaluated. Leaders make varied use of a raft of support opportunities from outside the school, including external reviews and local authority leadership and subject support. Where advice is adopted quickly, such as in mathematics, it is effective. However, sometimes advice, for example that from the recent pupil premium funding review, is not acted on promptly enough. The late adoption of the new national curriculum meant that some pupils were not fully
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
prepared for the greater demands on their learning. As a result, they did not perform as expected in national tests in 2016. It also means that some current Year 6 pupils are having to catch up with aspects of their learning. Until recently, the curriculum was too focused on English and mathematics. Leaders have increased its breadth and balance but this work still needs to be refined. The taught curriculum is supported by extra-curricular activities ranging from sports competitions to the pupil-led drawing club. Leaders make good use of the additional physical education funding, employing a specialist sports coach to develop teachers’ skills and increase pupils’ participation in competitions and external events. This is having a positive impact and greater numbers of pupils are taking part in such activities. School leaders are committed to staff development. New teachers are very well supported, with a range of professional development opportunities. New staff are
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
closely monitored, which means that support is sharply focused to their specific needs. Teaching assistants are also well trained, especially those who provide high-quality interventions for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors take their role seriously and responded well to the external review of governance they commissioned after the last inspection. They are increasingly active and have an improving knowledge and understanding of the work of the school. They are rightly asking questions and holding leaders to account. For example, they have recently identified a concern with the school’s performance management policy and are taking steps to amend it. Governors have started to ask leaders challenging questions about the quality of teaching, pupils’ outcomes and the spending of additional monies. However, they have accepted the answers they have been given rather than delving further, for example, when discussing the pupil premium funding. This means that they have not ensured that the additional funding is used effectively. The governing body has actively recruited governors with the specific skills required to
p.4
Governance of the school
fulfil their duties. This has helped develop their understanding of aspects of school governance, such as finance, and their overall effectiveness.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff and governors are well trained and keep up to date with recent policy and risks. For example, they recently held a parents’ information session about keeping children safe online. Pupils knew about this and several could explain the swift actions their parents had taken in response to the evening. Pupils are keen to explain actions they would take if worried when online and they understand the risks of social networks. Leaders work effectively with external agencies responsible for keeping children safe and are persistent in following up any concerns. The home-school link worker also works sensitively with parents and families who may need more support. The governor responsible for safeguarding effectively checks the staff’s understanding of safeguarding policy and processes, as well as confirming statutory checks are in place.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teaching does not routinely meet the needs of pupils of different abilities. Inconsistency in the use of assessment information about pupils’ understanding means learning activities are not always matched to what pupils need to learn. In particular, the most able pupils are not always given work that fully stretches them or are kept waiting for work of the right level. Teachers’ instructions about tasks are not always clear or speedy. Pupils are sometimes confused about what to do or are ready to begin before the teacher has finished. In addition, they sometimes finish tasks and do not move on to the next one unless they are specifically told to. As a consequence, learning time is lost. Teachers and teaching assistants do not always check pupils’ understanding in lessons closely enough. This means that some pupils can continue with misconceptions which then hinder progress. Teachers’ expectations of pupils’ work are not consistently high. For example, not all
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
teachers insist on the essentials of writing, such as full stops and capital letters. Some pupils continue making the same errors and are not supported to correct them. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well in the classroom and through extra programmes. These programmes are tightly focused to meet the needs of each pupil, for example with language acquisition or number skills. Pupils engaged in these individual sessions were positive about them and happily explained their new learning. Teachers display secure subject knowledge in mathematics and English and plan appropriately for each year group. The recent work the school has undertaken to improve the teaching of mathematics is effective. Pupils enjoy the focus on problem- solving and mathematical challenges, such as finding how to calculate specific areas and perimeters of quadrilaterals. The recent school drive to improve pupils’ ability to sustain extended writing has been
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
generally successful. Pupils’ work shows that many have made progress and are writing confidently and at length. However, some pupils are still getting accustomed to working in this way and need extra support. Pupils’ understanding and knowledge of phonics are developed securely. Pupils apply their learning effectively when reading, using strategies such as sounding out to help them. The most able pupils also apply emphasis and adopt a range of voices, making them a joy to listen to.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Pupils have too limited an understanding of the world beyond the school. This limits their ability to fully participate in modern British society. For example, none of the pupils spoken with knew what democracy was. The school has tried to promote a wider understanding of fundamental British values through initiatives such as the school council and house captains but have, so far, been unsuccessful in transferring the concepts beyond the school. The recent introduction of the ‘School Pirates’, each representing a personal quality such as responsibility or resilience, has been successful. Pupils enjoy the imaginative way these skills are developed. They are keen to explain when they have shown resilience or taken on school positions of responsibility. For example, Year 5 and 6 pupils have the opportunity to be appointed as dinner monitors to support Reception
p.5
Personal development and welfare
and Year 1 pupils when eating their lunches. Pupils’ leadership abilities are developed through a range of opportunities such as the school council. They are also encouraged to be independent. Individual pupils have taken this to heart. For example, one pupil developed and promoted the need for a lunchtime code. This is now in place, complete with interactive display and the Lunchtime Leopard, and is followed carefully by pupils and staff alike. Pupils who join the school during the academic year are well looked after. Staff know who they are and work hard to make sure that they are happy and quickly integrated into school life. Several parents spoke of the effective induction process and the warm welcome they had received. Pupils’ physical well-being is supported through the effective use of the specialist sports coach for physical education lessons. These sessions are focused and develop specific
p.5
Personal development and welfare
skills such as hand-eye coordination and stamina.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement because some groups of pupils do not attend school as regularly as they should. Attendance is not good enough for some groups of pupils and the school’s work to improve it is not yet effective. Leaders have introduced various strategies and reward systems for pupils, along with support from the home-school link worker. However, they have not evaluated which strategies are most effective and so have not been able to refine and improve the effectiveness of their actions. Pupils are confident and self-assured, demonstrating thought and care for pupils who are new to the school. They play well together, sharing the play equipment with each other. Their movement round the school is courteous and orderly, even picking up others’ coats and hanging them up if they see them on the floor. They were keen to talk with inspectors, and were especially polite and charming when asking to be passed
p.6
Behaviour
a football. There are positive relationships between the adults at the school and the pupils. Staff work hard to plan interesting activities and encourage pupils to focus on their work. As a result, the vast majority of pupils display positive attitudes to learning. In each class there are a few pupils who struggle with managing their own behaviour but this is managed well by the teachers and support staff. At times, this minority does impact on the learning of the other pupils but the consistent strategies are effective.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Outcomes for pupils require improvement because the progress they make across the school is not consistently good. In 2015, pupils made good progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of key stage 2. However, this was not the case in 2016, where published data indicates that pupils’ progress from key stage 1 to the end of key stage 2 was significantly below average. Key stage 1 results for reading, writing and mathematics are broadly in line with national averages for all pupils. However, no disadvantaged pupils achieved greater depth. Current pupils in the upper years, especially those who are disadvantaged and the most able, still have a lot of ground to make up to reach the standards of which they are capable. Pupils in the lower years, including those who are disadvantaged and most able, are performing better as a result of successful learning in Reception. Current pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are provided with
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
additional support. However, scrutiny of their work indicates that they are not yet making the progress they should. Pupils enjoy scientific exploration but their progress is varied because misconceptions are not addressed quickly. Evidence from their books indicates that their progress in science and the wider curriculum is too slow. The improved teaching of mathematics, with its emphasis on depth of learning and problem-solving, is improving pupils’ outcomes. School data, lesson observations and pupils’ work in books show that pupils are increasingly making progress towards age- related expectations. The school’s drive to improve pupils’ ability to sustain their extended writing has been effective. Tracking data and pupils’ work in books indicate that this is improving. Effective teaching of phonics in the Reception class and Year 1 has ensured that the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in the phonics screening check
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
has been higher than the national average for the last two years. In particular, disadvantaged pupils are now outperforming other pupils nationally in phonics. Pupils read fluently and use their phonics learning to sound out and blend when they come to tricky words. The most able pupils add expression and confidently deduce meaning from below the surface of the text. They enjoy reading and are keen to discuss their books.
p.7
Early years provision Good
Early years provision is good because teaching is among the strongest in the school. In addition, leaders effectively assess children’s progress and adapt learning activities to match their needs. This means that children make good progress. This is carefully tracked and parents appreciate the frequent communication and updates regarding their child’s progress. Children get off to a good start to school life in the Reception class. The early years leader effectively communicates with parents and other providers to ensure that children have a smooth transition from nursery or pre-school and settle quickly, including those who join the school during the year. They make good progress from their starting points and leave well prepared for Year 1. There are careful plans for learning in the early years. However, staff are confident in innovating and adapting the curriculum to make use of opportunities. For example,
p.7
Early years provision Good
following a morning frost, children were encouraged to compare the textures of items in the outdoor area. They could see how the sand in the ‘dino-swamp’ was now crunchy and the grass was now sharper than it had been the previous day. This willingness of staff to change plans helps to stimulate and develop children. The curriculum is broad and interesting and the overall structure of learning is clear. Movement from one activity to another is managed very effectively. Staff move swiftly from acting as a play partner to assisting learning, depending on the needs of the children they are working with. They have built very good relationships with the children, who clearly enjoy their learning. Children displayed confident language skills when talking with inspectors and were happy to collaborate in their play and exploration. For example, they moved the angle of a play car ramp to make their toy cars go faster and jointly brought more sand to
p.7
Early years provision Good
stop the dino-swamp being so mushy. They displayed a real sense of wonder and interest in their tasks. Children generally behave well but can get distracted. They are learning to show respect for each other, for example, by celebrating each other’s work and saying what they think the best bits are. Staff have high expectations of behaviour and these help develop children’s positive attitudes to learning. Over recent years, the proportion of children reaching a good level of development has increased and is now in line with national expectations. Disadvantaged children now outperform other children nationally, indicating that the additional funding is used effectively. Safeguarding is effective and all the welfare requirements are met.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Email address headteacher@waterside.hants.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 10–11 December 2014
p.9
Information about this school
Waterside Primary School is a little smaller than the average-sized primary school. There is one class in each year group, including the Reception class. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for pupil premium funding is higher than in other schools nationally. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is higher than average. The proportion of pupils joining or leaving the school during the school year is higher than average. The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the impact of the expenditure of the pupil premium or the physical education and sports premium on its website. The school has experienced many staff changes in recent years. This year, while not all new to the school, most teachers are new to their year groups. The school meets the government’s current floor standards for progress and attainment at key stage 2.
p.9
Information about this school
The pre-school located on the school site is managed separately and did not form part of this inspection.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The inspection team observed learning in all classes and also made shorter visits to classrooms. The headteacher joined the lead inspector on a learning walk and the deputy headteacher undertook a joint lesson observation. Inspectors spoke with a wide range of people, including pupils, parents, staff, leaders, governors and the local authority, to find out their views and experiences of the school. A wide range of documentation was scrutinised, including that relating to safeguarding, pupils’ achievement, policies, planning documents, governance, behaviour and attendance. Inspectors talked to pupils about their learning, listened to some read and looked at the work in their books across a range of subjects. They spoke to pupils on the playground, in the lunch hall and during lessons. They also met with a group of pupils to gather their views. In addition, they analysed the online survey responses from 24
p.11
Information about this inspection
pupils. Inspectors spoke with parents and considered 51 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, including 27 written comments. Inspectors also considered 33 responses from the online staff questionnaire and sought the views of staff in various conversations.
p.11
Inspection team
Lucy English, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Christopher Crouch Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion