Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Chailey School

Inspected 10 Jan 2017 · published 3 Feb 2017 · URN 114594

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    10 Jan 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Caroline Walshe

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BN8 4PU

  • Name on report verified

    Chailey School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexemplaryeffectiveeffectivelyexceptionallyvery welloutstandingimprovingconsistently
Criticismlimitednot consistentlynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings793w+85
  • What needs to improve89w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
875
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Helen Key Headteacher Chailey School Mill Lane South Chailey Lewes East Sussex BN8 4PU

p.1

Short inspection of Chailey School

Following my visit to the school on 10 January 2017 with Ofsted Inspector Sue Wood, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Chailey School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Chailey School

You have made a real difference since arriving in September 2016. You lead with clarity, passion and assurance. Your clarity means that you have already strengthened the accuracy of how leaders evaluate the effectiveness of provision. You have correctly identified where improvements should be made. With the support of the governing body, you and the leadership team are already tackling these areas with gusto.

p.1

Short inspection of Chailey School

You have built on the established culture and ethos of the school, which is enhanced by the strong relationships between staff and pupils. Staff know their pupils very well and help them to grow in confidence while developing their knowledge and understanding. As a result, pupils make good, and sometimes better, progress. Pupils appreciate what staff do for them and, therefore, their conduct is typically exemplary, both in lessons and around the school. Pupils are encouraged to have high aspirations.

p.1

Short inspection of Chailey School

At the time of the last inspection, inspectors identified that more pupils could make outstanding progress if: other teachers used effective teaching and learning strategies already in use in the school; teachers planned lessons that more closely match the needs and abilities of all groups of pupils; and pupils knew how to improve their work.

p.1

Short inspection of Chailey School

Leaders, with the support and rigorous challenge of the governors, have shared the strengths in English and other departments to highlight strategies that work to improve teaching and learning. Leaders work collaboratively with the local authority and are often asked to share their best practice with other schools. The programme of training for staff has been further enhanced by leaders’ effective use of school- based ‘action research’. Consequently, teaching is improving and staff apply the school’s teaching and learning policy effectively.

p.2

Short inspection of Chailey School

Teachers know their pupils’ individual needs well. In the strongest lessons, teachers use this information effectively, to challenge pupils and ensure a deeper level of understanding. Teachers also ensure that pupils can identify how to improve their work. However, this is not applied as consistently as you would like it to be.

p.2

Short inspection of Chailey School

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective, and all necessary checks are undertaken in the recruitment of staff. Leaders and governors are trained in safer recruitment and are involved fully in staff interviews. Staff and governors receive regular updates throughout the year and have read the most up-to-date guidance on ‘Keeping children safe in education’. Governors regularly check school processes and systems for safeguarding.

p.2

Short inspection of Chailey School

Pupils are taught how to stay safe, and they feel safe at school. Parents agree their children are well cared for and safe at this school.

p.2

Inspection findings

 During this inspection we looked closely at safeguarding arrangements. Inspectors considered how leaders are improving pupils’ attendance and how effectively the school is meeting the needs of disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  You correctly identified that attendance needed to be improved and made attendance a whole-school focus when you arrived in September. The additional staff employed to work with particular pupils and parents are having a positive impact. Pupils’ attendance is improving, particularly the disadvantaged and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  You have rightly identified that some disadvantaged pupils make more progress in some subjects than others. However, leaders are not looking closely enough at which interventions are having the greatest impact and which are not. Leaders need to give greater consideration to disadvantaged pupils who are working in

p.2

Inspection findings

line with national expectations.  The leader responsible for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, known as the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo), has a comprehensive tracking system in place in each year group for those that require support. This system allows her to monitor the impact of this provision precisely. In stronger subjects, such as English, strategies to support pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are used exceptionally well. However, this is not consistent enough across subjects. You and the SENCo have rightly identified the pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities who need to make more progress. Transition into the school is improving. The SENCo is working with primary schools to identify action plans earlier for particular pupils, so support can be directed appropriately when arriving at secondary school.

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 they look more closely at the interventions that are having a limited impact and adapt them accordingly  disadvantaged pupils make consistently good progress across subjects and year groups  all staff consistently plan lessons to support those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for East Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

Inspectors met with you, your leadership team, members of the governing body, middle leaders and the attendance team. We met with pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, both formally and informally, to discuss their views about their learning. We carried out learning walks with you and the leadership team to a variety of subjects and year groups. We looked at school documentation, including the school’s improvement plans, with current progress information, the school’s self- evaluation, and attendance information for current pupils. We also checked school policies relating to safeguarding and behaviour, and we looked at how the additional funding is being spent. Inspectors considered 91 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and 12 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion