Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Seely Primary School
Summary
Peter Stonier (lead), Heidi Malliff, Janis Warren, Stephen McMullan
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Dec 2016
- Inspectors verified
Heidi Malliff, Janis Warren, Peter Stonier, Stephen McMullan
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
NG5 3AE
- Name on report verified
Seely Primary School
- URN verified
139430
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- While leaders monitor lessons and the work in pupils’ books each term, this monitoring has not had sufficiently rapid impact in tackling inconsistencies in pupils’ progress in lessons and over time. p.3
- This has hindered the pace of improvement. p.3
- Consequently, they have not fully addressed the differences in the standards between the disadvantaged pupils at the school and those of other pupils nationally. p.3
- However, until recently, they have not assessed the impact of this funding in raising the achievement of disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils. p.3
- Often, leaders’ reports focus on the actions taken but do not pay enough attention to the impact of those actions. p.3
- This means that leaders and governors are not as clear about the school’s performance as they should be. p.3
- Because of the recent introduction of a new assessment tracker, teachers are now responsible for updating assessment information with pupils’ progress and attainment. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families9
“ Leaders promote strong links with parents.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 13
- Words of findings
- 3,491
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Seely Primary School Perry Road, Sherwood, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5 3AE
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Actions taken to improve the school have not been effective enough to ensure that all pupils make good progress in their learning. Senior and subject leaders’ plans for improving the school have not been precise enough to bring about the necessary improvements quickly. The school’s analysis of the impact of pupil premium funding is not sharp enough. This hinders the ability of senior leaders and governors to check which strategies are working best and which need refining. Governors do not always receive the information they need to hold leaders properly to account for pupils’ outcomes. Teachers do not match work to pupils’ abilities consistently well. Pupils are not challenged to extend their learning often enough and this results in them losing concentration. Teachers do not address pupils’ misconceptions consistently well. This results in pupils repeating errors in their work. Adults’ expectations of the presentation of
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
pupils’ work are sometimes too low. Pupils’ outcomes are not consistently good, particularly in key stage 1. The most able disadvantaged pupils do not achieve as well as they should by the end of Year 2. Disadvantaged children in the early years do not make as much progress as other children in the school or nationally.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The effective teaching of early reading is resulting in improved outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in the phonics screening check. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress, particularly in key stage 2. Pupils feel secure in the school. They trust staff to keep them safe and to resolve any disagreements quickly and fairly. Pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain. They make a good contribution to the local community, are tolerant of differences and knowledgeable about different faiths and beliefs. The school’s curriculum engages and motivates pupils well. Provision for the arts is extremely strong. Disadvantaged pupils benefit especially well from opportunities to develop their artistic skills.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – building on the improvements made by ensuring that all leaders demonstrate the necessary sense of urgency in improving the areas for which they are responsible – applying greater attention to detail to the school’s improvement plans by ensuring that they include measureable targets, regular milestones and clear lines of accountability – ensuring that the school’s improvement plans pay sufficient attention to the progress of pupils who need to catch up in their learning, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds – strengthening the procedures to check and evaluate the use and impact of the pupil premium in raising outcomes for disadvantaged pupils, particularly the most able pupils and the children in the early years – improving the quality of information that senior and subject leaders provide to governors about the pupils’ achievements and the impact of the measures taken to
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
improve the school. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, by ensuring that: – teachers tackle pupils’ misconceptions effectively – pupils, and particularly the most able disadvantaged in key stage 1, are given work that is well matched to their needs so that all pupils behave consistently well in class and make the progress they need to – pupils understand how, precisely, they can improve their work – teachers and teaching assistants insist on high levels of presentation in pupils’ work in all subjects and across all year groups. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders have not ensured that strategies to improve teaching have been consistently effective in securing good outcomes for all groups of pupils. While leaders monitor lessons and the work in pupils’ books each term, this monitoring has not had sufficiently rapid impact in tackling inconsistencies in pupils’ progress in lessons and over time. Leaders’ plans for improvement lack consistently clear success criteria and the necessary milestones to enable regular enough checks on whether the actions taken are bringing about the improvements intended. This has hindered the pace of improvement. Leaders have not used the assessment of pupils’ progress and attainment over time as effectively as they needed to. Consequently, they have not fully addressed the differences in the standards between the disadvantaged pupils at the school and those of other pupils nationally. Leaders ensure that disadvantaged pupils benefit well from the excellent enrichment
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
opportunities that staff provide, particularly in the arts. However, until recently, they have not assessed the impact of this funding in raising the achievement of disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils. Leaders have not provided governors with enough information about key aspects of the school’s performance. Often, leaders’ reports focus on the actions taken but do not pay enough attention to the impact of those actions. This means that leaders and governors are not as clear about the school’s performance as they should be. Leaders are increasingly effective in assessing pupils’ progress and attainment, particularly in English and mathematics. Because of the recent introduction of a new assessment tracker, teachers are now responsible for updating assessment information with pupils’ progress and attainment. This system has strengthened the school’s performance management arrangements because leaders are now more able to hold
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
teachers to account for pupils’ achievements and to challenge teachers where pupils are falling behind. The school’s curriculum engages and motivates pupils. It promotes healthy living and pupils’ well-being and safety effectively. Leaders have fostered a culture of tolerance and respect in the school. For example, they have implemented an effective system of peer mediators and restorative justice, should pupils fall out. Pupils of different ages whom inspectors met told them how they supported the school’s approach and that they are confident that adults will help them to solve any issues, should they occur. Leaders ensure that all pupils, and particularly disadvantaged pupils, are encouraged to develop their artistic skills to the full. Leaders ensure that staff enrich the curriculum with, for example, opportunities for pupils to learn Spanish and musical instruments and to perform music and drama to a range of audiences. Year 6 pupils who met with
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
an inspector were rightly proud of their achievements in the arts and keen to point out their work, which was on display throughout the school. Leaders have fostered strong links with the local community and this further enhances the school’s very effective work to develop pupils’ artistic skills and knowledge. Pupils regularly sing at a local care home, attend and display their work at local art exhibitions and are contributors to the annual Nottingham ‘Light Night’ event. Leaders promote strong links with parents. ‘INSPIRE’ days have been successful in promoting calculation methods in multiplication and division, as well the new phonics system that staff teach pupils in key stage 1. Parents told inspectors that they find these events helpful in providing information about what their children are learning at the school and how they can help them further. Leaders ensure that pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The school promotes equality and fundamental British values effectively. Pupils recently enjoyed an USA-style ‘presidential election’ to help with their understanding of democracy. Leaders enhance pupils’ knowledge of different religions and cultures by, for example, arranging visitors to assemblies to inform pupils about Sikhism, and for pupils to visit local places of worship. The funding received by the school to promote physical education (PE) and sport is used effectively. A specialist teacher has been into school to teach pupils and to train teaching staff. Around 100 pupils have benefited from two recent sports festivals and there are plans for increased inter-school competitions. Further plans are in place to improve the playground markings so that pupils can play more sport on site. Effective leadership of provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has ensured that these pupils achieve well, particularly in key stage 2. While
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
the special needs coordinator is currently on maternity leave, temporary leaders have begun to review pupils’ progress with parents. They have an increasingly clear picture of the next steps required to ensure that staff maintain the progress of pupils. Leaders work very effectively with external agencies, including behaviour support services, the child and adolescent mental health service and the local autism team. These outside agencies provide effective training for teaching assistants as well as teachers. Support from the local authority has not been as effective in securing rapid school improvement as it needs to be. Staff training, particularly in mathematics, has not had the impact intended because leaders and local authority officers have not checked pupils’ work carefully enough to ensure that this training has made a difference to pupils’ skills.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors are ambitious for every pupil to succeed and for the school to improve. They have a good understanding of many aspects of the school. However, they are not as clear about the impact of leaders’ actions to improve pupils’ academic achievements as they are about the impact of the arts on enriching pupils’ lives. This is because leaders do not provide enough information about the outcomes of particular groups, including disadvantaged pupils. Governors visit the school regularly and value these visits for the insight they provide into the workings of the school. Minutes of meetings of the governing body show that governors ask challenging questions of leaders, based on the information they receive. They are not complacent about the role they play in improving the school and have used a skills audit to identify and address gaps in their expertise. Governors have undertaken appropriate safeguarding training, including in areas such
p.4
Governance of the school
as extremism and in the need to recruit new staff safely. As a result, they have a good understanding of the risks to pupils and the need to ensure that staff protect pupils against harm. There are clear procedures in place for the appraisal of leaders and teachers. Governors are clear that they should only award pay increases, where applicable, when these are justified by improvements in staff performance.
p.5
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The school’s arrangements for safeguarding pupils meet statutory requirements. The designated staff are knowledgeable and clear. Robust systems are in place to respond to any safeguarding concerns. Records are comprehensive and show that staff work with parents to help keep pupils safe, and take swift action should the need arise. The statutory checks on staff suitability for working with children are thorough, and safeguarding training for all staff is appropriate and regular. There is a strong safeguarding culture within the school. Parents and pupils believe that the school is a safe place. Pupils described to inspectors how the school prepares them for emergencies and keeps them safe through security measures, such as the securely locked doors. Pupils talk knowledgeably about how to stay safe when using the internet, ensuring that they keep personal details to
p.5
Safeguarding
themselves. Leaders know the importance of analysing incidents regularly and closely so that they can quickly identify any trends and address issues briskly. They have recently replaced a previously complicated method of recording behaviour incidents with an effective and more efficient central system.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers do not consistently ensure that the work given to pupils is well matched to their abilities. Consequently, the most able pupils, in particular at key stage 1, do not make as much progress as they should. Pupils are not always clear enough about what, precisely, they need to do to improve their work. Consequently, teachers miss opportunities to deepen and embed pupils’ knowledge and skills. Not all teachers have consistently high expectations of pupils’ presentation of work. In some books, teachers accept untidy work and do not challenge basic errors. They do not consistently address, for example, the incorrect use of capital letters and inaccurate spellings of the names of the months, when pupils are recording the date on pieces of work. Where teachers tackle these errors, they do not follow up rigorously and, as a result, pupils often continue to make the same mistakes. Where teaching is strongest, pupils are appropriately challenged and teachers respond
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
quickly to their developing learning needs. For example, in one mathematics lesson seen, the teacher recognised quickly that a group of pupils had grasped the concept of ‘more than’ and ‘less than’. The teacher adapted the lesson to further stretch pupils’ learning through the introduction of ordering decimals. This enabled pupils to develop and deepen their thinking. Pupils of different ages use their phonic skills to good effect when trying to pronounce unfamiliar words. The majority of pupils told inspectors that they enjoy reading and that they also read at home, and there is time set aside for reading during the school day. They could talk about their preferred authors with, for example, Roald Dahl being a particular favourite in Year 2. The majority of teaching assistants are used effectively across the school to boost the learning of all pupils. In one particularly strong example observed, the teaching
p.6
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
assistant encouraged pupils to think of their own adjectives, to sound them out using their phonic knowledge, and then to write them down without adult help. In the majority of classes, pupils benefit from opportunities to use and apply their developing mathematical skills. For example, in a Year 5/6 class, the pupils worked together to calculate percentages and fractions. The teacher skilfully encouraged the pupils to use a range of strategies to solve the problems. Pupils clearly enjoyed this challenge, behaving well and developing a greater understanding during the lesson. Teachers plan regular opportunities for pupils of all ages to write at length. For example, during a Year 2 lesson, an inspector observed the pupils writing letters to Santa. In their writing, the pupils built upon their existing knowledge by adding noun phrases and adjectives to their work. The pupils were motivated to complete this task
p.6
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
and, as a result, improved their skills effectively. There are positive relationships between all adults and pupils in the school. Classrooms are calm and orderly, and an appropriate environment for learning. The colourful displays around the corridors and in classrooms are a strength, with staff ensuring that they promote a wide range of curriculum areas.
p.6
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The school’s effective work to promote pupil’s personal development and welfare starts as soon as pupils enter the school. Pupils are taught to value and respect the views and opinions of others. This is evident in the harmonious atmosphere that exists around the school. Pupils throughout the school look smart in their school uniforms and take obvious pride in wearing it. They are polite and courteous to adults, for example waiting in doorways to allow others to pass. Pupils use their good manners when talking to adults, including those who are visitors to the school. The pupils that inspectors spoke with feel that school is a safe place. Pupils speak confidently regarding keeping themselves safe online as well as having a good understanding of the different forms of bullying.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.
p.7
Behaviour
While pupils mostly behave appropriately, this is not consistent. When teachers do not give them activities that are matched appropriately to their needs, pupils lose concentration and then engage in off-task behaviour.
p.7
Behaviour
Standards of lunchtime behaviour are higher in key stage 1 than key stage 2. The dining hall for the younger children is calm and orderly with pupils eating their lunch quietly. Older pupils are noisier in their dining hall, with a very small minority shouting and not putting their trays away.
p.7
Behaviour
Pupils value the well-established systems to deal with fall-outs and disagreements. They believe that the school’s system of restorative justice and peer mediation works well. Pupils can explain the systems clearly and understand how they operate. Pupils also say that they have faith in staff to quickly step in and resolve any more serious incidents, although these occur rarely.
p.7
Behaviour
Racist and bullying incidents are extremely rare. The pupils are tolerant of one another and readily accept that others may come from different backgrounds, lifestyles or have different religious views to their own. Pupils’ attendance, having previously been too low, is improving. Initiatives such as a free breakfast club and a tougher approach to challenging parents for pupils’ absences are having an impact. The attendance officer has strong systems in place to help monitor patterns of absence and to build relationships with those families whose children do not attend regularly enough. Attendance rates are currently on track to match at least the national average by the end of the year.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Published results show that, in 2014 and 2015, pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, made progress in reading, writing and mathematics that was in line with that of other pupils nationally. However, recent outcomes have fallen. In 2016, pupils in key stage 2 made significantly less progress compared with other pupils nationally, in reading and writing.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The school’s current internal assessment information and work in books show that progress in reading, writing and mathematics is inconsistent across the school.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Some pupils, particularly the most able disadvantaged, in key stage 1 do not achieve as well as they should in reading, writing and mathematics. Outcomes in the Year 1 national phonics screening check have risen over the last three years. The performance of disadvantaged pupils showed a particularly strong improvement in 2016. Overall, however, the proportion of pupils passing remains below the national average. Current school information shows that the majority of Year 1 pupils are on track to achieve the expected standard for pupils of their age in reading. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, a high proportion of whom are also disadvantaged pupils, make good progress from their starting points. Pupils for whom English is an additional language make strong progress, especially in writing and mathematics.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
The early years provision requires improvement because leaders do not use the pupil premium funding consistently well to accelerate the development of disadvantaged children. Leaders are not as effective as they should be in ensuring that disadvantaged children receive the additional support and guidance to which they are entitled. Consequently, this group of children do not make the rapid progress they need to in order to catch up with non-disadvantaged children, nationally, from their low starting points. Children benefit from indoor and outdoor provision that staff have improved since the last inspection. Teachers and teaching assistants’ practice is improving over time because of carefully planned and well-targeted training opportunities. Adults plan tasks that are matched well overall to the interests and abilities of the children, and this helps them to make progress during lessons. Adults use skilful
p.8
Early years provision Requires improvement
questioning techniques to extend children’s learning and understanding. During a lesson that an inspector observed, children were engrossed in a task because there was a range of activities that engaged and stimulated them. They were all busy trying to answer the week’s question, which was, ‘How can we find out about autumn?’. Relationships between adults and children are very positive and this enables children to settle into learning quickly. The transition into the early years is well organised and structured. Children are therefore ready to start learning when they arrive. Parents are very positive about the start their children make in the early years and appreciate the good communication links they have with the school. Teachers and teaching assistants carry out regular and appropriate assessments on the children. Children’s learning journey documents show that adults regularly undertake a
p.8
Early years provision Requires improvement
wide variety of assessment tasks. These ensure that teachers can plan effectively for the next steps in children’s learning. Parents are also involved in informing staff when their child has made progress at home, so that teachers can adjust their planning accordingly. Leaders provide suitable challenge for the most able children. From their low starting points, the majority of children make good progress and are well prepared for the next stage of their education. Although the proportion of children who achieve a good level of development is currently below that seen nationally, this figure is increasing. Children make particularly good progress in writing. For example, those children who are able to demonstrate early mark making in September are able to form letters and write simple sentences by December. Safeguarding in the early years is effective. All statutory requirements are met.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.10
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.10
School details
Co-headteachers Jacqui Newton and Sally Pearce
p.10
School details
Email address admin@seely.nottingham.sch.uk
p.10
School details
Date of previous inspection 26–27 November 2014
p.10
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school opened in September 2013. It was formed from the amalgamation of two previous schools, Seely Infant and Nursery School and Seely Junior School, both of which closed. The school is twice the size of the average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium funding (additional funding from the government for children known to be eligible for free school meals or who are looked after by the local authority) is well above average. The proportion of pupils from ethnic minority groups is well above average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above average. The pupils come from a wide variety of backgrounds. The early years provision is part time in the Nursery and full time in the Reception classes. The school meets the government’s floor standards, which set the minimum
p.10
Information about this school
requirements for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.11
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed lessons in all year groups and examined a wide variety of pupils’ books from a range of subjects. These activities were sometimes accompanied by senior leaders. Inspectors held a range of meetings with the co-headteachers, deputy headteachers, subject- and other leaders, governors, and a representative from the local authority. They held meetings with groups of pupils and spoke to pupils in lessons and around the school and listened to them read. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including the minutes of meetings of the governing body, current assessment information provided by the school, the school development plan, plans written by the subject leaders for English and mathematics, and records relating to safeguarding. Inspectors talked to parents before school started, examined the results of 80 Parent View questionnaires and took into account a recent parent survey carried out by the
p.12
Inspection team
Peter Stonier, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.12
Inspection team
Stephen McMullan Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.12
Inspection team
Janis Warren Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.13
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.13
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.13
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.13
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.13
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.13
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.13
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.13
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion