Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Shropshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Jan 2017
- Inspectors verified
Lesley Bott
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
405316
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Their well-being, learning and development are compromised due to weaknesses in the childminder's practice. p.4
- However, this has not been effective in identifying key weaknesses of the provision. p.4
- The childminder is not clear about the procedures to follow if she has concerns about children's welfare or what to do should an allegation be made against them. p.4
- weaknesses in practice or maintain continuous improvements in the provision. p.1
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- develop a robust understanding of safeguarding issues and the signs that indicate a child could be at risk of harm, including any advice or guidance issued by the government 31/01/2017 p.2
- improve knowledge of the action to be taken in the event of an allegation being made about persons over 16 living or working on the premises 31/01/2017 p.2
- improve risk assessments to ensure children are not exposed to any dangers, in particular when two children sleep in a cot at the same time 31/01/2017 p.2
- develop knowledge of how to use information gained from observations of children's achievements to assess their progress and to plan challenging activities that help children make good progress 31/01/2017 p.2
- gain a secure knowledge of the progress check for children aged between two and three years in order to identify any emerging concerns and provide parents with a short written assessment of their child's progress 31/01/2017 p.2
- implement suitable procedures for keeping a record of any complaints and their outcomes. 31/01/2017 p.2
- implement robust self-evaluation systems in order to identify where practice is weak and take appropriate steps to improve. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes14
“Arrangements to monitor children's progress are not effective.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 833
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 16 January 2017 2 September 2013
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder does not have a sufficient understanding of her role and responsibilities with regard to child protection. She is does not know the procedure to follow if an allegation is made against herself or anyone living or working on the premises. The childminder does not complete accurate assessments. This means she is unable to identify any gaps in children's learning or know whether they are making progress. The childminder does not complete the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years in a timely manner. Consequently, she is unable to identify any emerging concerns promptly or seek support from other professionals. The childminder does not carry out robust risk assessments in relation to sleeping children. The childminder does not keep a record of all complaints and their outcomes. The childminder's self-evaluation is not rigorous enough. It does not identify
p.1
This provision is inadequate
weaknesses in practice or maintain continuous improvements in the provision.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder speaks to parents regularly about their child's care and achievements while in her provision. Parents comment that they are happy and satisfied with the service provided.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
develop a robust understanding of safeguarding issues and the signs that indicate a child could be at risk of harm, including any advice or guidance issued by the government 31/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve knowledge of the action to be taken in the event of an allegation being made about persons over 16 living or working on the premises 31/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve risk assessments to ensure children are not exposed to any dangers, in particular when two children sleep in a cot at the same time 31/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
develop knowledge of how to use information gained from observations of children's achievements to assess their progress and to plan challenging activities that help children make good progress 31/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
gain a secure knowledge of the progress check for children aged between two and three years in order to identify any emerging concerns and provide parents with a short written assessment of their child's progress 31/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
implement suitable procedures for keeping a record of any complaints and their outcomes. 31/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
implement robust self-evaluation systems in order to identify where practice is weak and take appropriate steps to improve.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder and looked at relevant documentation and evidence of her suitability. The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. The inspector took account of the views of parents through written feedback provided.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The childminder has a poor understanding and knowledge of current child protection legislation and wider safeguarding issues. For example, the indicators that children are at risk of being exposed to different ideas about right and wrong. The childminder is not clear about the procedures to follow if she has concerns about children's welfare or what to do should an allegation be made against them. She is, however, aware of the known signs and symptoms of abuse and neglect. The childminder has kept her first-aid certificate and other mandatory training up to date. She is also aware of ensuring that all adults in the home have undergone suitability checks. The childminder has carried out some evaluation of her practice. However, this has not been effective in identifying key weaknesses of the provision. The childminder does not keep a record of any complaints and their outcomes.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder does not make effective use of the information gained from her observations of children. Assessments of children's starting points and ongoing levels of achievement are inaccurate. This means the childminder does not identify gaps in learning, or monitor children's progress closely enough. As a result, she is not able to plan effective and challenging experiences based on what children need to learn next. Children are not provided with the stimulating activities they need to make good progress in their learning and development. The childminder does not complete the progress check for children aged between two and three years in a timely manner. As a result, she does not ensure there are opportunities to review children's development with parents, carers and other professionals.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's welfare is not assured. Although the childminder has taken some steps to minimise risks in her home, she has failed to fully assess the risk of allowing two children to sleep in a travel cot at the same time. This compromises children's safety and well-being. Children have access to outdoor play and outings which contribute to their physical development and help them to learn about healthy lifestyles. The childminder guides children appropriately to help them understand what acceptable behaviour is. They are learning to share and take turns.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children are not supported to make good progress in their learning. Their well-being, learning and development are compromised due to weaknesses in the childminder's practice. Arrangements to monitor children's progress are not effective. Children are not learning the key skills necessary in readiness for school. Nevertheless, they are independent and self-motivated to take part in some activities in the well-resourced environment.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 405316 Local authority Shropshire Inspection number 1064163 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 10 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 20
p.5
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 2 September 2013
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2001 and lives in Craven Arms, Shropshire. She operates all year round from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder works with a co-childminder.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion