Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Old Bank Junior Infant and Nursery School

Inspected 9 Dec 2016 · URN 107687

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jo Sharpe (lead), Beverley Riddle, Mary Lanovy-Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Dec 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Beverley Riddle, Jo Sharpe, Mary Lanovy-Taylor

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WF14 0HW

  • Name on report verified

    Old Bank Junior Infant and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    107687

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery wellmake good progressexcellentimprovedhigh-qualityvery effectivefeel safeconsistently
Criticismrequires improvementtoo oftentoo manyat riskstrugglepoorweaknessesnot good enough

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings604w−0
  • Leadership122w+33
  • Safeguarding53w−29
  • What needs to improve1208w+24

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,918
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 2%What needs to improve 46%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Old Bank Junior Infant and Nursery School Taylor Hall Lane, Mirfield, West Yorkshire WF14 0HW

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders and managers are not rigorous enough in their monitoring of teaching and learning. Consequently, they have not been aware that the quality of teaching is declining.  Leaders and managers’ evaluations of actions they take to promote school improvement are not sufficiently robust.  Too many pupils, particularly the most able, do not make the progress of which they are capable.  Teachers do not have high enough expectations of what some pupils can achieve, particularly the most able.  Teachers’ planning does not regularly take into account the different abilities of pupils in the class.  Teachers do not insist on better presentation of work, including handwriting.  Governors do not effectively challenge senior leaders on meeting their responsibilities.  Pupils’ behaviour requires improvement, particularly at breaktimes. The school has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Two-year-old children enjoy an environment that meets their particular needs well.  Children in the Nursery and Reception classes make good progress from their starting points.  Leaders of the different early years provisions have a sound knowledge of the needs of these younger children.  Teachers who monitor the quality of newly qualified teachers’ work do this well.  Pupils feel safe and their safety, personal development and well-being are a priority for all adults.  Leaders, managers and teachers ensure that learning excites pupils and makes them want to learn.  Some teachers are excellent at using a range of techniques to extend pupils’ learning.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management, including governance, by ensuring that: – for every new initiative there is a clear rationale, followed by rigorous scrutiny, to evaluate the impact on pupils’ outcomes for all groups – leaders monitor teaching and learning in a range of ways to ensure that the quality of teaching is consistently good or better across the school.  Improve the quality of teaching by ensuring that teachers: – have higher expectations of what pupils can achieve, particularly the most able – plan lessons more accurately to take into account pupils’ diverse abilities and starting points – raise their expectations of the standard of presentation in pupils’ books.  Improve the behaviour of pupils by ensuring that all adults challenge inappropriate language and physical interactions, particularly at breaktimes. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders and managers do not evaluate how well things are working before or after changes are made. Therefore, they make changes, such as the movement of some staff, and it is not always clear why. Currently they do not know if changes are benefiting pupils’ learning.  The new headteacher has not gained an accurate picture of the quality of teaching and learning because monitoring has not been thorough enough. For example, leaders have not established whether the ‘nurture’ room has been successful in helping pupils to spend more time as effective learners in the normal classroom environment.  Leaders and managers effectively promote equality of opportunity for pupils from different cultures and religions. However, equality of opportunities between genders is not as effective in some activities, such as football, where the behaviour of boys prevents girls from participating fully.  Leaders and managers ensure that pupils are engaged in learning through activities

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

that interest them. They have introduced a curriculum that is well planned so that pupils’ emotional and educational needs are taken into account.  The development of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. A comprehensive personal, social and emotional development curriculum includes topics such as friendship and tolerance, where pupils learn how to accept and celebrate difference. This helps prepare pupils for life in modern Britain.  Teachers who are responsible for monitoring and supporting the newly qualified teachers do so very well. Mentors hold regular sessions to give newly qualified teachers guidance about how they can improve the quality of their teaching.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governors have recently begun to evaluate the impact they have on school improvement and they have taken steps to improve their effectiveness. They have reviewed the skills they have and subsequently formed committees to focus on different areas of school improvement.  Governors recognise that currently they do not challenge the information they receive from the headteacher enough. They are beginning to use information from the headteacher more carefully to make challenges in governors’ meetings.  Governors acknowledge that the website does not currently meet requirements. They have not adequately reviewed whether the pupil premium, physical education and sport premium and special educational needs funding are used effectively. They acknowledge that an external review of governance would further improve their effectiveness.

p.3

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Staff have the appropriate training. Adults are vigilant when looking for signs that pupils may be at risk and know to whom to report concerns. Communication with outside agencies is good. Good systems are in place to keep pupils safe while they are at school.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Too many teachers plan lessons so that all pupils, regardless of their ability, are working on the same activity at the same level. For example, pupils’ mathematics books demonstrate that some pupils understand concepts being taught while others struggle.  The most able pupils have little incentive to work at a faster rate as they are generally asked to complete the same work as all other pupils before moving on to harder work. They say this is often tedious and means too frequently that they do not have time to complete more exciting and challenging work.  Teachers frequently do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve, particularly the most able. In a letter-writing activity pupils did not know which words they had spelled incorrectly or how they could have improved other aspects of their work.  Pupils’ handwriting and general presentation of work in books is too often poor and not

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

enough has been completed as teachers’ expectations of what they can produce are low.  Teachers set activities that encourage pupils’ interest in learning including practical and problem-solving tasks which help pupils gain an understanding of concepts.  Teachers in some classes use very effective questioning skills to find out what pupils know and understand. Older pupils improved their learning due to high-quality questioning, along with partner talk, which helped pupils create high-quality and emotive writing as survivors of the Titanic disaster.  Relationships between adults and pupils are good. This gives pupils the confidence to speak out and contribute to discussions without fear of failure.

p.4

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils say that they feel safe and they have a sound understanding of how they should keep themselves safe while using the internet.  Pupils know what bullying is, including cyber bullying, and how they should react if they become a victim.  Many older pupils take on roles of responsibility, such as at lunchtimes and as members of the school council. They perform these roles very well. The school council has been instrumental in supporting the views of pupils in the school, for example in securing a review of school-lunch menus.  Adults make sure that they know pupils’ emotional needs well and this nurturing ethos supports pupils’ personal development and welfare successfully. A nurture room, known as the Thrive Room, helps some pupils further develop their social and emotional skills in this well-resourced provision.

p.4

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Pupils’ behaviour is too often unruly at breaktimes and physical conflicts occur. Pupils say that this is typical behaviour.  Pupils comment that there are regularly incidents of prejudicial name-calling using words such as ‘gay’, idiot’ and ‘bitch’. Pupils say that teachers immediately address this inappropriate use of language. However, name-calling still persists.  Pupils’ attendance has shown some sign of improvement since the last inspection but is still below that of other pupils nationally. The percentage of pupils who were persistently absent between September 2015 and July 2016 was very high and much higher than in previous years.  Pupils are generally well behaved in lessons. Adults manage behaviour extremely well and disruptive behaviour rarely has a negative impact on learning.  Pupils are polite and thoughtful when communicating with visitors. They are also

p.5

Behaviour

respectful to adults they meet throughout the school day.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Outcomes for pupils, particularly the most able pupils in both key stage 1 and key stage 2, require improvement. Pupils do not make the progress they are capable of as the quality teaching does not meet their needs well enough.  Pupils’ work and their assessment information indicate that they are not making as much progress as previous cohorts in English, mathematics and other subjects. This is especially so in Years 4 and 5.  The number of pupils achieving the expected level in the Year 1 phonics check was below the national average. Although younger pupils have daily lessons to learn phonics, the quality of teaching is not consistently good enough to allow them to make sufficient progress. Older, more-able and less-able readers often struggle to read complex vocabulary, which prevents fluency and comprehension.  The progress of pupils in English and mathematics across the school over time has

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

been consistently close to that of other pupils of the same age nationally. Although attainment has been low, progress has been good from low starting points.  Disadvantaged pupils have made progress that is similar to that of other pupils nationally. However, this has not been fast enough for the most able disadvantaged pupils to catch up and reach the same levels of attainment as other pupils nationally.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make slower progress than that of other pupils with similar starting points nationally. Pupils receive generally good support through a range of strategies both in class and in separate lessons.

p.5

Early years provision Good

 Children in the early years make good progress from starting points that are typically lower than those of other children of the same age nationally.  Two-year-olds benefit from a well-planned and organised environment which meets their needs well. Adults in this provision are knowledgeable about the developmental needs of these younger children. The provision is well led and managed.  The two-year-old children are happy and settled as adults plan activities carefully to successfully interest them and take into account their learning needs.  Children in the Nursery and Reception class benefit from a rich and exciting environment, both inside and outside. They behave well and adults are good at encouraging them to resolve their own conflicts.  The early years leader manages the provision well. She analyses information on attainment, particularly for disadvantaged children, to help her plan. She has identified

p.5

Early years provision Good

weaknesses in language acquisition and has introduced a commercial scheme which has had a positive effect on this area of development.  The leader of the early years works closely with the local authority and other schools to ensure that assessments are accurate and that the provision remains good.  The leaders in both the younger and older early years provisions work closely with parents. Parents are encouraged to become fully involved in their child’s education and care at school. Leaders ensure that parents are well informed.  Across most subjects these children are well prepared to move into Year 1. However, the teaching of phonics is not good enough and opportunities are missed for children to practise the skills they are learning. Consequently children are not fully prepared for Year 1.

p.6

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.7

School details

Type of school Nursery, Infant and Junior

p.7

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.7

School details

Email address head.oldbank@kirkleeseducation.uk

p.7

School details

Date of previous inspection 10–11 May 2012

p.7

Information about this school

 Old Bank Junior, Infant and Nursery is a smaller-than-average primary school.  The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the pupil premium, admission arrangements, the most recent key stage 2 results and governance on its website.  The school has provision for two-year-old children.  The school meets the current government floor standards.  The proportion of pupils who are eligible for support from the pupil premium funding is higher than the national average.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in lessons in a range of subjects. The headteacher jointly observed lessons with all members of the inspection team.  The inspectors met with members of the governing body, including the chair and vice- chair of governors. They also met with a representative of the local authority and members of the senior leadership team.  Inspectors spoke with a number of pupils in lessons, at breaktimes and in formal meetings. Pupils discussed their work with inspectors and read to inspectors.  Inspectors took into account the views of staff from surveys and from discussions during the inspection. There were no results from the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View.  Inspectors studied a range of documents relating to the quality of teaching, governance and safeguarding.

p.8

Inspection team

Jo Sharpe, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Mary Lanovy-Taylor Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.9

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.9

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion