Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Woodham Walter Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 1 Dec 2016 · published 25 Jan 2017 · URN 115123

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Julie Winyard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Dec 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Winyard

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CM9 6RF

  • Name on report verified

    Woodham Walter Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

  • URN verified

    115123

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressoutstandingeffectivelyexcellentgood progresseffectiveloveconsistently
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementnot consistentlyweakconcernnot alwaysnot sufficientlynot good progress

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings633w+16
  • Leadership155w+49
  • Safeguarding128w+70
  • What needs to improve2005w+48

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,921
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 56%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

Woodham Walter Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School The Street, Woodham Walter, Maldon, Essex CM9 6RF

p.1

Inspection dates 30 November–1 December 2016

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Outstanding

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Following the previous inspection, senior leaders and governors have not consistently driven forward school improvement. Consequently, pupils have not made good progress in reading, writing or mathematics for the last three years, and the issues identified for improvement at the previous inspection have not been addressed fully.  Subject leaders are not held to account for pupils’ progress in their subjects. They are not sure how best to evaluate pupils’ learning.  Teaching is not consistently good. Teachers do not understand what good learning looks like in mathematics.  Correct letter and number formation is not taught consistently well from when children start in Reception.  Current progress in reading is improving because of the small group reading sessions taught by teachers. However, pupils do not apply the skills they learn in these sessions when reading their own choice of books.  Teachers in key stage 2 do not check the

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

organisation of reading books, or pupils’ reading choices, often enough.  Teachers have not given pupils sufficient opportunities to apply grammar and spelling skills in longer pieces of writing.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 School leaders and governors make effective use of the pupil premium. Consequently, eligible pupils make good progress from their starting points.  The leadership of special educational needs is outstanding. Staff go more than the extra mile to make sure that pupils’ needs are catered for. As a result, pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress from their starting points.  Pupils love coming to school because of the supportive environment the school provides. This accounts for the pupils’ good personal development, behaviour and welfare.  Safeguarding processes and procedures are robust and meet requirements.   The curriculum is good. There are many creative and interesting topics.  Good provision in the early years foundation stage prepares children well for Year 1. School, 30 November–1 December 2016

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by ensuring that subject leaders: – understand precisely what is required of them in their leadership role – choose the most effective method of evaluation so that they can work out precisely what is working and what is not working to improve pupils’ outcomes in their subjects – are held to account for their work through rigorous performance management.  Improve the quality of teaching so that it is consistently good by ensuring that: – all staff understand what good learning looks like in mathematics, and apply this knowledge when planning learning activities – teachers understand how to develop pupils’ reasoning and problem-solving skills in mathematics – teachers check that pupils make the most of the time they are given to complete learning activities in lessons – letter and number formation is taught consistently well from children’s starting points in Reception.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Secure consistently good progress for pupils from their starting points in reading, writing and mathematics by ensuring that: – pupils have sufficient opportunities to apply their grammar, spelling and punctuation skills in all subjects – pupils’ choice of reading books is at the right level for their understanding – pupils apply what they learn in teacher-led reading groups when reading from their own choice of book – pupils understand why they are learning different methods of recording calculations in mathematics. School, 30 November–1 December 2016

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Following the previous inspection, the headteacher and governors did not focus enough on analysing the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Consequently, they did not address the decline in pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics in key stage 2 or address the key issues from the previous inspection effectively. The headteacher is now clear about what must be done to improve the school. She is checking pupils’ progress more regularly and holding teachers to account through more rigorous performance management.  The local authority reviewed the school in November 2016, considering it a school of concern due to the decline in pupils’ progress.. As a result of the review and the appointment of a new chair of the governing body, the headteacher is very much back on track. There is now a clear focus on school improvement and a vision for how this can rapidly be achieved. The new short-term, sharply focused improvement plans set

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

out precisely what steps must be taken to address the important weaknesses, such as progress in reading.  Subject leaders monitor pupils’ progress in their subjects. However, the various evaluation activities they have chosen, such as book scrutiny and checking classroom resources, have not uncovered the reasons for weaknesses in progress in reading, writing and mathematics in key stage 2 accurately. Plans are in place for the English leader to read with pupils to check their understanding of texts and monitor their reading records, and for the mathematics leader to observe learning in lessons but this has not happened yet.  The headteacher has recently improved the approach to monitoring teachers’ work. Meetings to check pupils’ progress are taking place every half term and teachers’ targets are clearly linked to pupils’ outcomes. There has not been time for the effect of this to be seen in the progress pupils make over time.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Last year, the headteacher introduced expectations for how pupils present their work but this has not been rigorously monitored until recently. Consequently, she has not recognised that children do not learn correct letter and number formation from when they start at the school, and that this remains an issue as pupils move through the school.  The curriculum is good. It is carefully planned, well organised and introduces pupils to a wide range of different subjects. Pupils enjoy learning and like the visits to different places that are included in each topic. They love the opportunity to learn outside in the forest school lessons.  The school has good links with a school in Kenya and teachers from the school have visited Woodham Walter. The school is also linked to a culturally diverse school in London. As a result, pupils have a good understanding of different cultures and talk about how everyone gets on well together at school whatever background they come

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

from, thus preparing them well for life in modern Britain. School, 30 November–1 December 2016  The curriculum is extended by the good range of after-school clubs and by good links with the local church and community. Pupils take part every year in the Village Review and attend special services at the church, such as the Christmas Christingle. These activities support pupils’ good spiritual development and their understanding of their contribution to the local community.  The school makes good use of the primary school physical education (PE) and sport premium. This is evident in teachers’ confidence to teach a range of different sports and in pupils’ attendance at after-school sports clubs.  The outstanding leadership of special educational needs is a strength of the school. Parents speak very highly of the way the school manages each pupil’s needs very carefully so that pupils settle down rapidly and get the support they require in lessons

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

and throughout the school day. Assessments are accurate and careful due to excellent liaison with specialists, such as the educational psychologists and speech therapists. The special needs leader makes sure that the specialist learning support assistants have good up-to-date training, for example in supporting pupils with autism. Due to the outstanding provision, all pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress from their starting points.  Of the 58 parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, the overwhelming majority have positive opinions about the school. Most would recommend the school to another parent.

p.4

Governance

 Following the recent local authority review, governors have gained a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Since the new chair of the governing body took over in September, governors have a sharper understanding of their role in monitoring and challenging leaders about the quality of education. The chair of the governing body now works with the headteacher at least once a week on school improvement.  There is a new approach to governors’ visits, which, in the words of one long-standing Governor, are ‘more robust’. Each visit has a sharp focus and results in an evaluative report to the full governing body.  Governors have used their powers effectively to co-opt new governors with useful expertise in education and experience of governance.  Governors monitor the school budget well. They carefully check that the pupil premium grant is used effectively to ensure that eligible pupils make good progress from their

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Arrangements to safeguard children are well managed and all procedures and processes meet requirements. All staff have undertaken required training and a detailed record is kept to ensure that their training is updated regularly. The training helps to make sure that pupils are safe at school.  Pupils identified as most vulnerable are carefully supported and cared for. The school liaises very effectively with external agencies that give additional support. School, 30 November–1 December 2016  There are hardly any incidents of poor behaviour. If there is an incident, it is recorded with sufficient detail with a clear explanation of how the incident was managed and resolved. There have been virtually no exclusions from school for the last three years.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching has not been consistently good since the previous inspection. As a result, pupils’ progress has not improved rapidly enough.  Teachers plan interesting learning activities for pupils but do not give consistently good explanations about why they are encouraging pupils to use particular approaches, such as how to solve mathematical problems. An example of weak explanations include when most-able pupils in key stage 1 are good at adding numbers in their heads quickly but are not encouraged to use this skill when adding numbers to make 100.  Pupils do not complete as much work as they are capable of because teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve. Sometimes pupils pause for too long between tasks and lose focus on what they are learning.  Learning support assistants are given careful instructions by the teachers so they know how to help pupils carry out tasks. In most cases, they give pupils time to think things

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

through for themselves, and ask questions to help them to think.  Specialist teaching assistants work very effectively with pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. They understand how to support pupils’ particular needs effectively, often talking pupils through each task that they are asked to undertake.  Teachers’ assessments are accurate and are checked regularly with nearby schools and with local authority advisers.  Teachers follow the school’s marking and feedback policy but teachers themselves do not always model the style of handwriting they are teaching pupils to use. As a result, pupils’ work is not sufficiently well presented.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are confident and enthusiastic about their school. One parent commented, ‘I was shocked during my first time in the school assembly – pupils are so confident at sharing their ideas.’ Another parent said, ‘It’s a massive WOW! Children gain so much confidence here!’  Pupils work together well in most lessons. They talk about their work and help each other to solve problems, for example in mathematics. This contributes to their good social development.  Most pupils are keen to work hard and enjoy their lessons. However, often they do not produce enough work and they do not take sufficient care in the way they present their written work. School, 30 November–1 December 2016

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils behave well in lessons, as they walk around the school and on the playground. They respond at once when adults ask them to stop and listen, for example at the end of breaktime. This contributes to their good moral development.  Pupils say there is no bullying of any kind in the school and that pupils take good care of each other. At breaktimes, older pupils take it in turns to be play leaders making sure that younger pupils have someone to play with.  Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe when using the internet.  Attendance has improved this school year and is high compared with other schools nationally.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ progress from the end of Year 2 to the end of Year 6 has been below average for the last three years for most pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. The headteacher and teachers have worked hard this term to turn this around. Consequently, current pupils in key stage 2, including most-able pupils, are making better progress than previously. The school’s current performance information indicates that about half the pupils have already reached age-related expectations for the end of the school year in mathematics.  Although the school’s own assessment information shows better progress in reading in key stage 2, this is based on assessment of teacher-led reading sessions. It does not include a full evaluation of pupils’ ability to apply the skills they learn in these sessions when reading on their own. This is because teachers in key stage 2 do not check pupils’ choice of reading book or whether they are applying skills learned from the

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

sessions when reading on their own. Pupils often select books that are beyond their level of understanding.  Pupils make good progress in learning to read in key stage 1 due to the effective, systematic approach the school uses to teach phonics. Pupils’ reading choices are carefully monitored by teachers and, consequently, least-able pupils are given plenty of practice and the most able are given the right level of challenge to move their learning forward.  At the time of the inspection, the school did not have the end of autumn term performance information for pupils’ progress in writing in key stage 2. Scrutiny of pupils’ books indicates good progress in the unaided writing tasks pupils complete in English, but good progress in writing is not evident in pupils’ writing in other subjects, such as history. School, 30 November–1 December 2016  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress from

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

their starting points due to the excellent learning plans provided for each pupil. Every pupil with a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan has a target book that contains all the targets from their statement or plan. Teachers and specialist teaching assistants value these target books because it helps them to work from the targets and carefully note the small steps of progress each pupil makes.  Disadvantaged pupils of all abilities, including the most able, make good progress from their starting points because the funds to support their learning are used effectively. Teachers meticulously check the pupils’ understanding on a regular basis and provide the necessary support to help them to learn new skills.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 Most children start in Reception with skills, knowledge and understanding similar to other children of their age. They make good progress due to the good teaching and range of activities provided for them. Most achieve a good level of development by the end of the Reception Year with some doing even better than this.  The curriculum is very carefully planned and the early years leader makes sure that children have interesting and child-friendly topics on offer. Traditional stories have been very popular and children love acting out their favourite parts of stories in the role-play area or with puppets in the puppet theatre.  The early years leader ensures that assessment opportunities are planned into every learning activity. Teaching assistants have copies of the plans and are confident to make notes in children’s records, known as ‘learning journeys’, when they notice a child can do something they could not do before.

p.7

Early years provision Good

 The classroom is well organised and attractive. Children easily find resources to help them with their reading and writing. The outside learning area is well resourced and carefully fenced so that children are safe when they choose to go outside with or without adult support.  There is good leadership of the early years foundation stage. The leader has a good understanding of the requirements of the early years framework, and ensures a good balance between activities children can choose from and direct teaching of key skills, for example phonics and number skills.  Assessment is currently accurate. The school recognises that this was not the case in 2014 because outcomes were not checked robustly by leaders. Assessments are now moderated by the local authority to ensure that leaders have an accurate view.  Children have good opportunities for writing in all learning activities, for example writing party invitations or letters to Santa. However, there is not a consistent

p.7

Early years provision Good

approach to teaching letter and number formation when the children start to write, and so too many children do not form letters and numbers accurately by the time they reach Year 1. School, 30 November–1 December 2016

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address admin@woodhamwalter.essex.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 17−18 November 2011

p.8

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school is much smaller than most primary schools.  There is a high proportion of pupils with education, health and care plans and statements of special educational needs, and those who receive school support.  Most pupils are of White British heritage and none speak English as an additional language.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations of pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6. School, 30 November–1 December 2016

p.8

Information about this inspection

 The inspector held meetings with senior leaders, subject leaders, teachers, parents, pupils, representatives of the local authority and the Diocese of Chelmsford, the chair of the governing body and governors. The inspector listened to some pupils, from most year groups, read.  The inspector visited lessons. Most of these visits were with the headteacher, the chair of the governing body and the leader of provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  The inspector looked at pupils’ books from all year groups. This activity was conducted alongside senior leaders.  The school’s action plans and self-evaluation were considered.  A number of documents were studied, including policies and records relating to the safety and welfare of pupils, such as behaviour records, the record of checks on staff’s suitability to work with children, and pupils’ files.  Responses from 58 parents to Parent View were considered and the inspector also

p.9

Information about this inspection

spoke to a number of parents during the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

Julie Winyard, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector School, 30 November–1 December 2016 guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion