Social care · Social care interim inspection
Children's home run by Keys Education Ltd in Rossendale
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Dec 2016
- Inspectors verified
Hannah Bates
- URN verified
SC020594
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Supervisions do not provide an opportunity for staff to reflect on practice, learn from incidents and therefore unsafe situations and inadequate staff practice continues to occur. p.3
- Poor risk management has led to young people being in unsafe situations. p.2
- Despite concerns being raised by the organisations independent visitor, the manager has failed to act and rectify the concerns. p.3
- Staff have failed to report significant safeguarding concerns to their manager or police. p.2
- There continues to inadequate management oversight of safeguarding incidents. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In order to meet the quality and purpose of care standard, the registered person must ensure that staff p.5
- In order to meet the positive relationships standard, the registered person must ensure that staff p.5
- In order to meet the protection of children standard, the registered person must ensure that p.5
- In order to meet the leadership and management standard, the registered person must 08/01/2017 * (2) (f) understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home. p.5
- At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.7
- This is in line with the Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance13
“Poor risk management has led to young people being in unsafe situations.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 953
- about usual (typical 904)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
This home was judged requires improvement at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has declined in effectiveness . Since the last inspection, there has been insufficient management oversight. There has continued to be management of safeguarding incidents. This inspection has raised four requirements, three of which have not been met from the previous inspection. A compliance notice has been raised.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Since the last inspection, six new young people have been admitted to the home. Six young people have left the home. Young people’s transition plans are poor. They do not provide enough planning, guidance or support to young people.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Whilst matching of young people has started to improve, young people still spend significant periods of time on their own. There have been occasions where young people have met up with one another in an unplanned way. This has meant that staff have not risk assessed the potential impact of young people’s behaviour on each other and have not followed management guidance. This has resulted in young people running away together and putting each other at significant risk of harm in the community.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Poor risk management has led to young people being in unsafe situations. Staff do not rigorously ensure that they follow young people’s risk management plans and the home’s policies and procedures. For example, young people have been able to access staffs mobile phones, lighters and tobacco. Staff have failed to manage young people’s risk-taking behaviours or the environment safely and in line with risk management plans. This resulted in a young person not only placing himself at risk but also staff and members of the public. The potential consequences of this incident are significant.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Staff do not understand risk. They do not take proactive action to intervene when they know that young people have put themselves at risk. They do not follow young people’s risk management plans appropriately. For example, on one occasion a young person was not reported as missing until a significant period of time afterwards. Staff have failed to report significant safeguarding concerns to their manager or police. These concerns have been raised in previous inspections and continue to be raised in this inspection. There is a significant lack of learning from incidents. Young people continue to not receive individualised care. Risk management plans continue to be generic and without young people’s involvement. The plans do not provide staff with enough guidance as to how to provide good quality care for the individual young person. This has resulted in staff not managing young people’s complex needs appropriately and safeguarding incidents have occurred.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Communication between staff and managers within the home is poor. Significant information continues to be missed and not shared with one another. For example, after staff have had key working sessions with young people, they have not shared significant information with placing authorities or the manager. Follow up work with young people is not completed. This impacts on young people’s progress.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Management oversight is weak. There continues to inadequate management oversight of safeguarding incidents. Despite concerns being raised by the organisations independent visitor, the manager has failed to act and rectify the concerns. Safeguarding incidents in the home continue to be missed meaning that there is insufficient management monitoring of them. Managers do not provide staff with enough guidance after safeguarding incidents. As a result, poorly managed safeguarding incidents continue to happen, with young people being placed at significant risk.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Staff supervisions are inadequate. Managers do not review safeguarding concerns or staff practice appropriately and discuss this within staff supervisions. Managers do not pick up on staff training needs and offer them support and guidance within supervisions. Supervisions do not provide an opportunity for staff to reflect on practice, learn from incidents and therefore unsafe situations and inadequate staff practice continues to occur.
p.3
Information about this children's home
The home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to eight young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home runs a 12 week programme which focuses on engaging young people with activities. As part of the programme, young people spend periods of time away from the children’s home either camping or in bunkhouses.
p.4
Recent inspection history
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 28/09/2016 Full Requires improvement 26/07/2016 Full Inadequate 14/03/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 05/08/2015 Full Requires improvement
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
6: The quality and purpose of care standard
p.5
Requirement Due date
In order to meet the quality and purpose of care standard, the registered person must ensure that staff
p.5
Requirement Due date
(2) (b) (iv) provide personalised care that meets each child's needs, as recorded in the child's relevant plans, taking account of the child's background. 23/01/2017
p.5
Requirement Due date
In order to meet the positive relationships standard, the registered person must ensure that staff
p.5
Requirement Due date
(2) (a) (x) are provided with supervision and support to enable them to understand and manage their own feelings and responses to the behaviour and emotions of children, and to help children to do the same. 23/01/2017
p.5
Requirement Due date
In order to meet the protection of children standard, the registered person must ensure that
p.5
Requirement Due date
(1) children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe;
p.5
Requirement Due date
(2) (a) (i) staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child's relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. 23/01/2017
p.5
Requirement Due date
13: The leadership and management standard
p.5
Requirement Due date
In order to meet the leadership and management standard, the registered person must 08/01/2017 * (2) (f) understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home.
p.5
What the inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children's home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children's home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Information about this inspection
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.8
Information about this inspection
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Information about this inspection
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Information about this inspection
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion