Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 12 Dec 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tracy Hannon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Dec 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tracy Hannon

  • Postcode verified

    TA5 2QS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedhigh expectationsrobusttimelyproudhappyaccurateimproving
Criticismgapsfailedineffectiveweaknesseslimitednot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
928
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Nicholas Benbow Otterhampton Primary School School Lane Combwich Bridgwater Somerset TA5 2QS

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 12 December 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its section 5 inspection before the one that took place in December 2015 the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that the systems for keeping records of safeguarding and safer recruitment are complete and monitored and evaluated routinely by leaders and governors  make certain that teachers set work that matches the standards expected for pupils’ ages  put in place robust systems to check regularly on pupils’ attainment and progress which will provide timely advice to teachers so that gaps in pupils’ learning are closed quickly, particularly in writing  ensure that governors receive routine and accurate information on pupils’ attainment and progress  undertake an external review of governance in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I spoke with you, the two English leaders, the chair of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. I also held a telephone conversation with the local leader of education who has been supporting your school since November 2015. I talked with pupils in lessons and around the school. Together we scrutinised some examples of pupils’ work and reviewed some monitoring documents such as the checks you have conducted on teaching and learning. I reviewed the school’s safeguarding arrangements.

p.2

Context

There has been a considerable turnover of staff since the previous inspection. Two of the three classes have new teachers. Last year, you had no teaching commitment. This year you are currently teaching for three days a week. You have reorganised the class structure in the school. The governing body has also been restructured. There are currently two vacancies on the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

You and your governors have failed to check that safeguarding and recruitment procedures are rigorously carried out. Consequently, aspects of the school’s record- keeping and governors’ checks on records are not fit for purpose. Safeguarding is ineffective. During the monitoring visit, I discovered that procedures to recruit staff were not fully compliant with statutory requirements. You and the chair of the governing body understood the seriousness of such findings and took immediate action to rectify the situation during the inspection.

p.2

Main findings

You closely aligned the school improvement plan with the areas for development in the last full inspection report. Your plan includes well-placed milestones for governors to check the effectiveness of activities. Your immediate action after the inspection brought about some improvements. For example, staff training and the purchase of additional resources have led to improvements in the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics. However, weaknesses in teaching still exist because you have needed to revisit key training with new staff this academic year. This has slowed down the school’s improvement journey. Gaps in pupils’ learning are not closing quickly enough, particularly in writing. Teachers’ expectations for pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar skills are not high enough. Although the school’s policy identifies certain words that pupils must spell correctly, our look at books showed that teachers are not adhering to this

p.2

Main findings

You have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Consequently, attitudes to learning are improving. Pupils’ books reflect pupils’ improved attitudes towards their learning. They take care to organise their work carefully and to present it neatly. Your literacy leader is rightly proud of the improvements in pupils’ handwriting. Pupils understand your expectations and say that rules help to keep the school a ‘happy place to be’. However, there is still more work to be done. When teachers do not closely match activities to pupils’ needs, pupils are not excited or sufficiently engaged in their learning. As a result, their concentration falters and they do not make enough progress in these lessons.

p.3

External support

You have been working closely with a local leader of education (LLE) from Avishayes Community Primary School. The local authority brokered this support in November 2015. The LLE has provided timely advice and guidance. For example, teachers’ plans are better matched to support the development of pupils’ reasoning skills in mathematics. In the summer term, LLE support focused on the recruitment of two new teachers. You have twice postponed the local authority visits to check the impact of leadership because of staff illness. This has limited the information that governors receive about the progress the school is making. A greater intensity of support is now required to secure higher academic standards across the school and to check that all safeguarding procedures meet requirements.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion