Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Roosters Day Nursery

Inspected 22 Dec 2016 · published 18 Jan 2017 · URN 218480

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Susan King

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Mr Dennis Morris & Mrs Ruth Morris Partnership

  • Group reference verified

    RP906353

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Dec 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Susan King

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CW3 9BT

  • Name on report verified

    Roosters Day Nursery

  • URN verified

    218480

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−19Mixedmore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidentlymake good progressweaknesseshappyeffectivelywell supportedeffectiveskilfully
Criticismnot good enoughtoo manyat risklackinconsistentconcernsnot alwaysnot make good progress

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings50w0
  • What needs to improve786w−19

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
793
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Roosters Day Nursery 6 Brassington Terrace, Den Lane, Wrinehill, Crewe, Cheshire, CW3 9BT

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 22 December 2016 16 April 2013

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 The quality of teaching is not good enough. The observations that managers make of practitioners' teaching do not accurately measure the quality of the teaching taking place. As a result, practitioners are not helped sufficiently to improve.  The planning for activities does not take enough account of what children know, understand and can do. Consequently, teaching does not rigorously target what children need to learn next, and children do not make good progress.  Although practitioners share information with parents collecting children from nursery, the details they provide about babies' daily care are sometimes inaccurate.  Some practitioners do not teach children to make choices that help to promote their health and well-being.  Practitioners ask too many questions that do not challenge children to learn new information or encourage them to express their own ideas.  Self-evaluation does not routinely identify weaknesses in the provision. Consequently,

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

managers do not take effective action to continuously improve practice.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Managers and practitioners demonstrate commitment to improving the provision. They attend all mandatory training.  Well-established routines help to promote children's independence. For example, when pre-school children find that the tricycle seats are wet, they confidently find a cloth and dry them.  Children show that they feel secure and happy. They readily approach practitioners for reassurance and to seek help.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve the support and guidance that practitioners receive to improve the quality of teaching and ensure that this is effectively monitored 24/03/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that the planning of activities takes full account of what children need to learn next, so all children benefit from taking part and are well supported to make good progress and achieve the next steps in their learning. 24/03/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 improve the accuracy of information shared with parents about babies' individual care and activities  increase staff's knowledge and skills in relation to helping children make informed decisions about matters that affect their health  strengthen questioning techniques used by practitioners to encourage children to explore their own ideas and extend their knowledge.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors. She assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed two joint observations with the deputy manager.  The inspector held a meeting with the manager and deputy manager. She discussed the nursery's self-evaluation and plans for continuous improvement.  The inspector checked evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery.  The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Observations made by managers of teaching do not lead to measurable targets that show what each practitioner needs to improve. Consequently, plans for practitioners' professional development lack rigour and do not drive improvements in the quality of teaching. Parents like the confidential online system that enables nursery practitioners to share information about their children's experiences and achievements with them. However, information given to parents about babies' daily care is sometimes inaccurate. For example, babies' individual sleep times are not accurately noted throughout the day. Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Practitioners attend training that helps them to identify children who may be at risk of abuse or neglect.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Children experience a wide range of interesting and enjoyable activities indoors and outside. Spontaneous teaching by practitioners often helps to promote children's progress. For example, toddlers have fun playing with modelling dough. Practitioners teach them how to roll the dough flat and cut out shapes, and this helps to promote children's physical development. However, practitioners do not use their assessments of children's achievements well enough. For example, when they identify concerns about children's progress, they do not use this information to precisely target their teaching. Consequently, gaps in attainment do not close quickly enough. Consistent daily routines include regular adult-led group times. However, practitioners ask children too many closed questions that focus heavily on teaching and reteaching a limited range of knowledge. This means that practitioners do not make the most of opportunities to help

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

children think deeply and achieve the specific next steps in their learning.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

Practitioners develop good relationships with children. They teach children to share toys and take turns. However, not all practitioners vigilantly promote children's health. Pre- school children and children attending the holiday club play outside in cold weather without putting on jumpers or coats. Practitioners do not best help children to minimise the risk of cross-contamination during handwashing routines. Consequently, children do not always learn to make choices that keep them healthy. Nevertheless, managers carefully assess and minimise risks to children's safety. For example, practitioners and children who walk along the lane to the nearby park follow clear rules.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

The quality of teaching is not yet good enough to help children make as much progress as they could. Children begin to write their names and learn to link some written letters with sounds. They can use scissors skilfully and confidently. Children can count and they often use numbers during activities and routines. Children are helpful and willingly join in at tidy-up time.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 218480 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 1063704 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 11 Total number of places 44 Number of children on roll 59 Name of registered person Mr Dennis Morris & Mrs Ruth Morris Partnership

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 16 April 2013 Telephone number 01270 820848

p.4

reference number

Roosters Day Nursery was registered in 1997. The nursery employs 11 members of childcare staff. Of these, one holds an appropriate early years qualification at level 6, two hold level 4, seven hold level 3 and one holds level 2. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday all year round. It operates a holiday club and an after-school club. Nursery and holiday club sessions are from 7.30am until 6pm. After-school sessions are from 3pm until 6pm during term time. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion