Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Swallow Hill Community College
Summary
Lynn Kenworthy (lead), Michael Cook, Steven Beverley, Steve Rogers
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Nov 2016
- Inspectors verified
Lynn Kenworthy, Michael Cook, Steve Rogers, Steven Beverley
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LS12 3DS
- Name on report verified
Swallow Hill Community College
- URN verified
139054
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teaching does not secure consistently good progress in a wide range of subjects. p.1
- Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate p.1
- Despite the recent actions taken by senior leaders, pupils do not make consistently good progress across a wide range of subjects. p.1
- Over time, weak teaching and subject leadership in mathematics and science mean that pupils do not make enough progress in these subjects. p.1
- Following the poor examination results in 2015, they requested that senior and middle leaders provide more detailed and up-to-date information about pupils’ progress, behaviour and attendance. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve leadership and management at all levels by: – continuing to strengthen middle leadership so that subject leaders can tackle weaknesses quickly and effectively without external support – ensuring that improvement plans have clear actions and timelines – ensuring that governors have a detailed and accurate picture of the progress of current pupils so that they can hold leaders to account. p.2
- Continue the current trend of improvement in attendance and behaviour by: – reducing the proportion of pupils who are regularly absent from school p.2
- Over time, leaders have not ensured that all groups of pupils achieve as well as they could. p.3
- They have not responded quickly enough to weaknesses in teaching, particularly in mathematics and science. p.3
- Therefore, pupils do not make consistently good progress across a wide range of subjects. p.3
- The recently appointed interim principal and her senior team have high expectations of pupils and staff. p.3
- Pupils are responding well to the increased rigour in teaching and assessment, and pupils’ behaviour is improving. p.3
- Senior leaders have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,319
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Swallow Hill Community College Whingate Road, Armley, Leeds LS12 3DS
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Despite the recent actions taken by senior leaders, pupils do not make consistently good progress across a wide range of subjects. Over time, weak teaching and subject leadership in mathematics and science mean that pupils do not make enough progress in these subjects. Action plans do not focus sharply enough on the areas of the school’s work that require improvement. Governors do not challenge senior leaders effectively. Although they receive detailed information on pupils’ progress, they do not ask probing questions about its reliability. As a result, they have an overly positive view of the school. The curriculum does not enable all groups of pupils to make good progress. However, leaders are taking the action required to address this. Teaching does not secure consistently good progress in a wide range of subjects. The most able pupils do not make enough progress because teachers do not set challenging
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
enough work for them. Attendance is improving but is well below the national average for secondary schools. The number of pupils who do not attend regularly remains too high. Fixed-term exclusions are reducing but they are still too high.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Progress in English for most groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, is improving rapidly due to effective subject leadership, teaching and assessment. The school provides effective support for pupils whose first language is not English. Therefore, their communication skills are developing well. The school’s new approach to assessment, marking and feedback is having a positive impact on pupils’ progress because pupils know how to improve. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is well delivered and varied in content. Pupils said they value the way the school celebrates diversity.
p.1
Full report
In accordance with section 13(5) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires significant improvement.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase the progress made by all pupils, especially in mathematics and science, by ensuring that: – teachers help pupils who have gaps in their knowledge and understanding to make faster progress, especially disadvantaged pupils – teaching across key subjects is consistently effective and all teachers have the highest expectations of what pupils can achieve – the most able pupils are challenged by the work teachers set. Improve leadership and management at all levels by: – continuing to strengthen middle leadership so that subject leaders can tackle weaknesses quickly and effectively without external support – ensuring that improvement plans have clear actions and timelines – ensuring that governors have a detailed and accurate picture of the progress of current pupils so that they can hold leaders to account. Continue the current trend of improvement in attendance and behaviour by: – reducing the proportion of pupils who are regularly absent from school
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– ensuring that teachers implement, consistently, the current approach to improving behaviour so that fewer pupils are excluded from lessons and from school.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Over time, leaders have not ensured that all groups of pupils achieve as well as they could. They have not responded quickly enough to weaknesses in teaching, particularly in mathematics and science. Therefore, pupils do not make consistently good progress across a wide range of subjects. The recently appointed interim principal and her senior team have high expectations of pupils and staff. Pupils are responding well to the increased rigour in teaching and assessment, and pupils’ behaviour is improving. Senior leaders have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. However, improvement plans are not focused specifically enough on the next steps needed to improve the school rapidly. Senior leaders rigorously check that the school’s policy on assessment, marking and feedback is followed consistently across subjects. More reliable information about pupils’ progress is now available to teachers and leaders because formal assessments
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
are used more effectively and have been validated externally to check their accuracy. More recently, leaders have been successful in strengthening their evaluation of the quality of teaching so that it is accurate. Where necessary, teachers have been provided with support and there is now a range of training in place. Teachers are clear about their responsibility for improving pupils’ rates of progress. Over the past year, the Academies Enterprise Trust and the Rodillian Multi Academy Trust have supported leaders well. Therefore, subject leadership in mathematics and science is becoming more effective but it is too early to see the full impact. Most middle leaders are clearly ambitious for improving performance in their subjects and there is a growing capacity within this team to move the school forward. Subject leaders are now monitoring the quality of teaching more effectively and providing
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
targeted training for staff. Nonetheless, subject leaders have not been equally successful in establishing high standards of teaching and pupils’ progress across all subjects. Staff feel well supported and are very positive about working in the school. They welcome the recent opportunities for training and professional development, for example the use of ‘coaching pairs’. Teachers who are new to the school spoke highly of the quality of their induction and support. Leaders have reviewed the curriculum so that it is now more closely matched to pupils’ needs and starting points. The curriculum is now broad and balanced. Courses are more challenging for the most able pupils and a range of intervention programmes are available. For example, the speech and communication programme is used effectively to develop the skills of pupils whose first language is not English. Pupils select from a wide range of creative and technology subjects to study in Year 9 and they are well
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
motivated in those subjects. The school offers a wide variety of visits and extra-curricular activities, catering for a range of interests, from trampolining to playing the ukulele. High numbers of pupils participate in sport, the arts and community work. Projects such as ‘Altogether Armley’ and ‘Armley Helping Hands’ give pupils an understanding of their role within the local community. The school council gives pupils an opportunity to take on additional responsibility. A homework club is also available every evening and is well attended. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is strong. There is a well-coordinated programme of assemblies, tutorials and learning activities designed to promote a cohesive community. An effective citizenship programme places an emphasis on teaching pupils about British values and life in modern society. Pupils spoke highly of the way in which the school celebrates diversity, and relationships within the school are
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
mainly positive. Pupils show a deep understanding of current issues such as preventing radicalisation. Pupils across all year groups benefit from a comprehensive programme of careers guidance. This includes visits from a range of local businesses, mock interviews and days which are dedicated to exploring different careers. This helps to guide their choices at key stage 4 and gives pupils a thorough understanding of the range of careers available to them. Pupil premium funding is targeted appropriately to support the progress of disadvantaged pupils across the curriculum. Following a review of the school’s use of pupil premium funding, the impact of this funding is now carefully evaluated. Leaders have made informed decisions about which approaches are having the most effect and have amended their plans accordingly. The progress of disadvantaged pupils has improved significantly in English but at a slower rate in mathematics. Differences
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
remain between the attendance and progress of this group of pupils and the national averages for other pupils. Additional funding to support pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is used well, and their rates of progress are improving. However, attendance rates for this group remain low and the number of fixed-term exclusions for this group has increased recently. Year 7 catch-up funding is used effectively to develop the literacy and numeracy skills of pupils who need additional support. The language development programmes have been more effective than those which aim to develop numeracy skills. The school has a well-planned approach to promoting pupils’ reading. Teachers work effectively with the librarian to encourage an enjoyment of reading and pupils use a range of reading skills across the curriculum. The school’s own surveys show that parents and carers are very positive about the
p.4
Governance of the school
Following a review of governance, the local governing body is now more effective. They have reorganised their committee structure so that they have clear responsibilities for overseeing the work of the school. Following the poor examination results in 2015, they requested that senior and middle leaders provide more detailed and up-to-date information about pupils’ progress, behaviour and attendance. These reports are evident in the minutes of governing body meetings. However, governors have not provided sufficient challenge to leaders about the accuracy and completeness of the information presented. As a result, they have an overly positive view of the current performance of the school. Governors have a good understanding of the use of pupil premium funding and the way in which it is used. They are very aware that the progress of disadvantaged pupils is better in English than in mathematics. They receive regular and accurate reports on
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Strong procedures for managing behaviour and safeguarding mean that pupils feel safe in school. Safer recruitment practices are given a high profile and staff are very aware of their safeguarding responsibilities. Staff are well informed about the current issues affecting young people. All staff complete online training on safeguarding, as well as receiving regular training updates from senior staff. Detailed reporting of concerns show that staff are vigilant and deal with potential risks in a timely and appropriate way. The school works well with other agencies to provide support. For example, there is a single point of contact with social services to ensure that cases are referred promptly and the school works effectively with the police liaison officer to reinforce the school’s values. The school curriculum actively promotes pupils’ understanding of key safeguarding
p.5
Safeguarding
issues. Consequently, pupils show a good understanding of potential risks such as online safety and child sexual exploitation.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teaching, learning and assessment are getting better, and pupils’ progress is beginning to improve. However, the quality is still too variable between and within subjects. In science, the quality of teaching is inconsistent despite recent improvements in the effectiveness of subject leadership. Teaching is most effective when pupils are given adequate time to practise their skills and consolidate their understanding. For example, when pupils are given time to develop their explanations and apply their scientific knowledge, they engage well with the task. In the separate sciences of biology, chemistry and physics, pupils are set tasks which they find challenging but they persevere to find solutions to a given problem and this leads to strong progress. In other areas of science, a lack of challenge leads to off-task behaviour and pupils make slow progress. Teaching in mathematics is improving. Sometimes, pupils are given challenging work
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
which develops their reasoning skills. For example, open questions are used to challenge pupils’ thinking, such as ‘if you divide a number, is it always smaller?’ Pupils have some opportunities to develop their problem-solving skills and to put together convincing arguments. At other times, pupils with different starting points are given the same task to do. This leads to some pupils finishing before others and having to wait for further work to complete. In key stage 4, some pupils have gaps in their knowledge and understanding which prevent them from being able to make good progress. For example, some Year 11 pupils have experienced weaker teaching in key stage 3 so they are not confident in using their times tables. Numeracy sessions in tutorials have limited effect because they are not delivered consistently well by tutors. Across other curriculum areas, teaching is variable. When teaching is well structured
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
and teachers use their subject knowledge and effective questioning to enthuse pupils, they make good progress. On occasions, when the work is too easy or pupils are given too much time to complete an activity, they lose concentration. In English, pupils benefit from their teachers’ high expectations and well-structured learning activities. Relationships are very positive and pupils are engaged in their learning. Teachers use effective questioning to encourage pupils to develop their ideas and to make links between the texts they are studying. However, the subject leader agrees that the most able pupils need further challenge. She has plans to increase pupils’ vocabulary and to provide more opportunities for pupils to express and justify their own opinions so that they can achieve the higher grades. The school’s policy for marking and feedback, the ‘PINS’ system, is used consistently across subjects. Consequently, pupils understand what they have learned and how
p.6
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
they can improve. Sometimes pupils are given insufficient time to respond to their teachers’ feedback and to make the suggested improvements in their work. The teaching of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is improving, particularly at key stage 3. Teachers and teaching assistants are increasingly able to identify pupils’ needs and to help pupils to make similar progress to their peers. Very effective teaching, underpinned by strong relationships between teachers and pupils, is provided for pupils whose first language is not English. This includes the use of the ‘sound training’ intervention and small-group teaching closely linked to the mainstream curriculum. High-quality feedback is used effectively to improve communication and comprehension. Lower-attaining pupils enjoy reading and use their phonics knowledge well to read unfamiliar words. The most able pupils read confidently and expressively, and they
p.6
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
understand what they are reading. On occasions, the most able pupils could be encouraged to read more challenging books.
p.6
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Pupils are beginning to develop higher aspirations for themselves but some pupils lack the motivation to succeed. Younger pupils show mainly positive attitudes to learning. For example, the ‘resilience programme’ at key stage 3 is encouraging pupils to reflect on their own learning, to accept challenge and to work towards aspirational targets. Pupils said that bullying is rare and incidents are usually managed well. However, they also said that some pupils do not follow the school’s expectations. Assemblies promote powerful messages about the consequences of bullying and pupils show a good understanding of different types of bullying. Pupils said that discriminatory language is not used very often and that they are taught to treat others as they would like to be treated themselves. Leaders monitor closely the behaviour, attendance and progress of pupils studying off-
p.6
Personal development and welfare
site so that pupils are safe, but their attendance remains low and their behaviour is challenging. ‘The Bridge’ resource is well used for pupils who need short-term support for personal, social and emotional well-being before being reintegrated back into mainstream lessons.
p.7
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Although the new system of ‘positive discipline’ has been successful in engaging most pupils in their learning, pupils and some staff said that it is not yet used consistently well across the school. Pupils said that, at times, when teachers do not follow the agreed stages, poor behaviour is allowed to escalate and some pupils are removed from lessons on a regular basis. When learning is challenging and engaging, pupils respond well and make strong progress. When the work set is not well matched to pupils’ abilities, pupils do not try their best and off-task behaviour prevents them from making good progress. Exclusions are reducing but they remain high. They are higher for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Attendance is improving but it is still well below average. The proportion of pupils who regularly miss school is reducing for all groups of pupils, including disadvantaged
p.7
Behaviour
pupils, but it is still high. The attendance of pupils attending alternative provision is low. Pupils’ behaviour around the school is calm and orderly, with a few examples of boisterous behaviour at breaktimes. Social areas are well supervised by staff and most pupils behave respectfully towards each other.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Outcomes require improvement because, over time, levels of attainment and rates of progress have been well below national averages and have not improved rapidly. Attainment and progress in English and mathematics improved in 2016. However, pupils did not make appropriate progress from their starting points across a wide range of subjects. The most able pupils do not make enough progress across a range of subjects. This is also true of the most able disadvantaged pupils. Not enough pupils are challenged to aim for the highest grades and the proportions making expected and better-than- expected progress, in both English and mathematics, remain below average. Evidence in pupils’ books suggests that the current pupils in key stage 4 are not on track to achieve their targets. In key stage 3, there is evidence in pupils’ books of higher expectations and these pupils are making much stronger progress across a range of
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
subjects. The school’s own progress information for 2016 suggests that there has been strong improvement in English for most groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. This is due to effective leadership and consistently high levels of expectation in this subject area. Progress in mathematics and science has been much slower due to frequent changes in staffing and ineffective leadership in the past. The percentage of pupils attaining A* to C grades in modern languages and humanities in 2016 has also increased. This is partly due to fewer pupils being entered for the English Baccalaureate but also because of increased rigour in the teaching and assessment of these subjects. In 2016, the school’s own progress information shows that pupils with low and average starting points made better progress across a range of subjects compared to previous years. This is due to the use of additional staffing and well-directed support.
p.8
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The differences between the progress of disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally are diminishing rapidly in English. This is because teachers are aware of their pupils’ needs and they plan well-targeted interventions which are improving their literacy skills. Although the difference is diminishing in mathematics, it remains wide compared to other pupils nationally. Across a range of subjects, the attainment of disadvantaged pupils is increasing over time. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make different rates of progress depending on their learning needs. For example, pupils whose primary need is speech and communication make stronger progress than other groups due to the high- quality support provided. Pupils in younger year groups are now making faster progress because their needs are identified quickly and they receive appropriate support. Pupils who speak English as an additional language made much better progress in
p.8
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
2016 across a range of subjects compared with 2015, due to effective teaching and support. Most pupils who need to catch up in English are making accelerated progress in Year 7 and some pupils are making accelerated progress in mathematics. This is largely due to the school’s specific programmes for intervention but also because of the school’s successful approach to improving literacy across the curriculum. Current pupils in the school are making better progress from their starting points than previous cohorts. Leaders view the data to be reliable now and believe that pupils in the current Year 11 will make better progress than previous year groups. It also shows that pupils in Years 8, 9 and 10 will make good progress. The school’s self-evaluation is supported by the quality of work seen in pupils’ books during the inspection. For the very small number of key stage 4 pupils who access off-site provision, there is
p.8
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
regular communication with the school about their progress, but low rates of attendance hamper their progress across the curriculum. Increasing levels of attainment mean that more pupils now have the qualifications they need to progress onto appropriate further education or work-based training.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority Academies Enterprise Trust
p.9
School details
Website www.swallowhillcommunitycollege.org
p.9
School details
Email address contactus@swallowhillcommunitycollege.org
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 3–4 February 2015
p.9
Information about this school
Swallow Hill Community College is smaller than the average secondary school. The interim principal took up post in September 2016. The school is part of the Academies Enterprise Trust and is also supported by the Rodillian Multi Academy Trust. The majority of pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is above average, the largest group being Pakistani. The proportion of pupils whose first language is not English is well above average, with 32 different languages being spoken. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average. ‘The Bridge’ is a school resource where pupils can access support for social and emotional well-being. In 2014 and 2015, the school did not meet the government’s floor standards that set minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.
p.9
Information about this school
A small number of pupils attend off-site provision. The providers are ‘West 14’, ‘AIM’, ‘Southways’, ‘Educ 8’ and ‘West 11’. The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish.
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 30 lessons across all key stages and subjects. Some were observed jointly with members of the senior leadership team. In addition, inspectors visited assemblies and tutorial sessions. In addition to an examination of books in lessons, three inspectors undertook an examination of books with subject leaders. Meetings were held with the interim principal, senior and middle leaders, a member of the governing body, a representative from the Academies Enterprise Trust and a representative of the Rodillian Multi Academy Trust. Inspectors also met with pupils from all year groups. Inspectors reviewed the school’s self-evaluation, the school improvement plan, the school’s records of quality assurance, monitoring and assessment, minutes of governors’ meetings and case studies of vulnerable pupils receiving additional support. Inspectors scrutinised school policies including safeguarding procedures.
p.11
Information about this inspection
Inspectors considered two responses recorded on Parent View and surveys of parents’ views carries out by the school. They also considered 54 responses to Ofsted’s survey received from staff.
p.11
Inspection team
Lynn Kenworthy, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Michael Cook Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion