Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
The Grangefield Academy
Summary
Malcolm Kirtley (lead), Iain Veitch, Julia Wright
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Dec 2016
- Inspectors verified
Iain Veitch, Julia Wright, Malcolm Kirtley
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
TS18 4LE
- Name on report verified
The Grangefield Academy
- URN verified
139673
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The chair of governors oversees a strong team of governors who have introduced extremely robust monitoring systems that ensure that pupils’ progress is consistently under review. p.4
- Effective teaching and positive relationships enable pupils to make good progress and achieve improving levels of attainment. p.1
- Their conduct around the school site and in lessons is exemplary. p.6
- High expectations were consistently demonstrated in English, mathematics and geography books. p.6
- From their starting points, current pupils make consistently strong progress in a wide range of subjects. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Senior leaders, governors and the academy trust have worked closely to eradicate inadequate teaching and ineffective leadership. p.3
- The most able pupils are not consistently challenged in science at key stage 4, while the quality of work in books is not as strong in French and history. p.5
- While progress is improving in the majority of subjects, the most able are not consistently challenged in science, while progress in French and history remains weaker. p.6
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Accelerate improvements in the rates of pupils’ progress, by: – addressing remaining inconsistencies in the quality of teaching – providing greater challenge for the most able pupils – embedding recent improvements to planning and teaching. p.2
- Improve the achievement and attendance of disadvantaged pupils by: – further developing actions in the classroom to complement external intervention work – building upon recent improvements in their attendance. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,196
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
The Grangefield Academy Oxbridge Avenue, Stockton-on-Tees TS18 4LE
p.1
Inspection dates 30 November – 1 December 2016
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The principal has established a culture of high expectation that permeates all aspects of the school’s work. Her relentless focus on improvement has contributed to significant increases in pupils’ progress. Effective teaching and positive relationships enable pupils to make good progress and achieve improving levels of attainment. Heads of school and subject leaders work closely together to ensure that pupils’ personal well-being and their academic progress are continually addressed. Governors provide focused support and challenge and these have contributed to the substantial improvements in recent years. They use their considerable expertise to hold leaders to account for key aspects of performance. Pupils are considerate and polite and demonstrate high levels of courtesy towards one another and adults. The arrangements for safeguarding pupils are effective. Teachers are committed to the welfare and well-being of their pupils.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school works effectively with Northern Education Trust and other partners to strengthen leadership, the quality of teaching and the accuracy of assessment. Despite recent improvements, disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities remain more likely to be absent than their peers. Variability remains in the quality of teaching in some subjects and this can lead to unevenness in rates of progress, including the progress of disadvantaged pupils. The most able pupils are not consistently challenged across all subjects.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Accelerate improvements in the rates of pupils’ progress, by: – addressing remaining inconsistencies in the quality of teaching – providing greater challenge for the most able pupils – embedding recent improvements to planning and teaching. Improve the achievement and attendance of disadvantaged pupils by: – further developing actions in the classroom to complement external intervention work – building upon recent improvements in their attendance.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The principal has led a significant cultural change over the past three years that has transformed the quality of teaching and standards of behaviour. An ethos of high expectation informs all aspects of the school’s work. The principal and her team have instilled high expectations and increased levels of challenge while maintaining staff morale. Teachers feel supported and value their ongoing professional development, which is leading to clear improvements in the quality of teaching. Senior leaders, governors and the academy trust have worked closely to eradicate inadequate teaching and ineffective leadership. This has resulted in staff movement, but at the same time considerable support has been invested to build leadership capacity. Heads of school have a strong overview of pupils’ well-being and they track their academic progress closely. They work with subject leaders to address underperformance swiftly and identify appropriate interventions.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Middle leaders are closely involved in checking standards and work with senior leaders to assess the quality of teaching. They are accountable to leaders and governors but welcome this challenge and their central role in improving standards. Their work contributes to a relentless focus on the quality of teaching and intervention that is contributing to improving outcomes across the school. Senior leaders have established high expectations for the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. They ensure that all teachers take pupils’ starting points and ongoing progress closely into account. This is leading to improving rates of progress, although variability remains in the quality of teaching in a minority of subjects. Senior leaders are committed to ongoing improvement. They work closely with local primary schools to build curriculum continuity between primary and secondary schools. A number of senior leaders sit as governors on the governing body of local primary
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
schools to ensure that transitions are effective. Leaders are effectively using pupil premium funding to improve provision and support and this has led to a diminishing of differences over the past three years. Catch-up funding supports initiatives such as additional teaching assistant support and after– school reading training that are leading to improvements in reading and writing for pupils. An improving quality of teaching is evident in subjects such as English and mathematics, where clear leadership, effective planning and demanding curricula are leading to much stronger rates of pupils’ progress. Progress in science has remained more variable. There remain occasions where the most able pupils are not adequately challenged. Pupils benefit from a broad and balanced curriculum. Pupils have access to curriculum routes that address their needs and regularly participate in progress clubs that provide
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
additional support. They receive helpful guidance on careers and further education, and the school is building close links with local employers and providers of higher education. The school has successfully recruited staff to fill gaps in key areas, and the majority of key appointments are now in place. Leaders have successfully used teachers from the Teach First initiative to build capacity. Leaders have worked closely with the multi-academy trust to continually check standards, improve the quality of teaching and strengthen leadership and governance. The principal has also explored additional partnerships with local schools and the local authority to intensify actions to spread good practice rapidly. These partnerships have successfully contributed to the improvements the school has made in recent years.
p.3
Governance of the school
The chair of governors oversees a strong team of governors who have introduced extremely robust monitoring systems that ensure that pupils’ progress is consistently under review. Governors make frequent visits to the school, some of which are unannounced, enabling them to gain a realistic picture of the school’s work. Governors have particular areas of focus that they report upon on a regular basis. Governors have supported leaders in the more challenging conversations that have taken place in recent years to hold teachers to account through the stronger implementation of performance management procedures. Governors check the use of additional funding, such as the pupil premium, and this has resulted in a diminishing of differences over the last two years. They have overseen the effective management of financial resources through a challenging period of change.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders take their responsibilities for pupils’ welfare extremely seriously. The actions taken to check the suitability of adults working at the school are extremely thorough and records are assiduously maintained. Staff training is up to date and teachers pursue any concerns about pupil welfare rigorously. Pupils have a good awareness of how to stay safe and can discuss the actions they could take to stay safe online.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
The quality of teaching is good. Teachers take close account of pupils’ needs in their planning and this enables the majority of pupils to make good progress. The ethos of mutual respect promotes a positive learning climate that supports effective learning. The quality of teaching is strong and improving in many subjects. In English, teachers maintain a strong focus on key language features that support pupils in their writing and in their analysis of texts. Mathematics teaching is now much stronger, as pupils are challenged to pursue higher-level tasks and apply their mathematical reasoning to more complex problems. There are examples of motivational teaching in catering and art. For example, in catering, pupils master a range of cooking skills while exploring the complex science behind the sauces they make. In art, pupils consider how the work of established artists informs their own practice as they craft delicately shaped clay bowls with finely
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
applied decorative adornments. Senior and middle leaders have rigorous systems in place to check the quality of teaching and its impact upon progress. As a result, there is increasing consistency in many aspects of teaching and assessment across the school that are promoting the improving rates of pupils’ progress. Variability remains in the quality of teaching in some subjects. The most able pupils are not consistently challenged in science at key stage 4, while the quality of work in books is not as strong in French and history. The school actively promotes a love of reading. All pupils in Years 7, 8 and 9 arrive in school early and take part in whole-school reading. As a result, pupils value reading and are able to read well. Inspectors heard the most able pupils reading with fluency and expression and the least able decoding effectively and talking passionately about how reading support had improved their learning and self-esteem. The teaching of
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
literacy is becoming more embedded across the curriculum, although numeracy is less well developed. Time in lessons is used very effectively. Pupils are punctual and settle swiftly to their learning. The pace of learning provides sufficient time for pupils to consolidate their learning while also gaining access to new skills and concepts. On some occasions, the most able pupils are not moved on to challenges swiftly enough. Teachers set homework in line with the school’s homework policy. Pupils respond positively to homework tasks, which they believe support and extend their learning. As progress is reviewed at weekly meetings, teachers ensure that appropriate and timely interventions are in place to address underachievement. Teachers typically link classroom tasks closely to additional interventions that support pupils’ progress. Teachers are aware of the needs of disadvantaged pupils and track their progress
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
carefully. Some of their classroom-based interventions are not as well developed as the external interventions, such as the evening progress clubs. The support provided for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and for the lower school nurture group is effective in helping these pupils to make good rates of progress. High levels of consistency were evident in teachers’ use of the school’s assessment policy to support progress. Pupils found that teachers’ feedback helped them to improve the quality of their work.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Year 11 pupils described powerfully how this support has improved over the last three years. Each year group has its own head of school as part of the ‘school-within-school’ system that ensures that teachers know their pupils extremely well and have a close understanding of their needs. As a result, pupils feel secure and this enables them to focus upon their learning. The school promotes values of respect and mutual understanding. Pupils of different faiths and cultures interact positively with one another. Pupils feel safe and supported by their teachers and their parents agree. Incidents of bullying are extremely rare. Pupils are comfortable in reporting the few occasions when bullying does occur as they have confidence that teachers will address this effectively.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Their conduct around the school site and in lessons is exemplary. They line up in an orderly fashion and arrive at lessons punctually as they value their learning. Pupils are courteous and polite, greeting visitors warmly and holding doors open for one another and adults. The new behaviour policy encourages positive conduct. Pupils are encouraged to behave well through a simple rewards system, while clear boundaries are set for unacceptable behaviour. Rates of fixed-term exclusion are below those seen nationally. School leaders show vigilance in improving rates of attendance. Swift contact is made when attendance falls below target, including home visits. As a result, rates of attendance for all pupils, and for disadvantaged pupils, are improving, although disadvantaged pupils remain more likely to be absent than others.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
From their starting points, current pupils make consistently strong progress in a wide range of subjects. Progress and attainment have increased substantially over a three- year period as a result of improving teaching and stronger leadership. Although 2016 progress in mathematics for the outgoing Year 11 was weaker, current pupils are making much stronger rates of progress. Improvements in teaching have led to bolder challenge for pupils and work over time in books reveals strong rates of progress. Improved tracking and support for disadvantaged pupils have heightened their rates of progress over a three-year period such that differences between disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally are diminishing. While some differences persisted in 2016, current progress of disadvantaged pupils across a range of subjects and year groups shows consistent improvement. The increased rigour and challenge evident in teaching is reflected in progress over
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
time in books across a wide range of subjects. High expectations were consistently demonstrated in English, mathematics and geography books. While progress is improving in the majority of subjects, the most able are not consistently challenged in science, while progress in French and history remains weaker. The most able pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, are beginning to make improved rates of progress. Current pupils are making good progress as reflected in the school’s tracking systems and in their work in books over time. Their overall ‘progress 8’ score increased by almost two thirds of a grade in 2016 and most-able pupils made better progress in English than was seen nationally in 2016. The most able disadvantaged pupils made better progress than their non-disadvantaged peers, although overall standards of attainment remained below those seen nationally. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities made improved progress
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
in 2016 as a result of more focused interventions and better-quality teaching. Pupils are increasingly better prepared for the next stage of their education, although historically weaker progress in mathematics and for disadvantaged pupils limits this preparedness for some pupils.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address enquiries@thegrangefieldacademy.co.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.8
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish. The school is part of the Northern Education Trust. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is below average, as is the proportion who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is broadly average. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium is well above the national average. The school meets the government’s floor standards, which are the government’s minimum standards for pupils’ performance at GCSE. The school does not use any alternative provision.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors carried out observations of learning across a wide range of lessons, a number of which were jointly undertaken with senior leaders. Pupils’ behaviour was observed during lessons, lunchtimes and at playtimes. Inspectors examined the quality of work in books, in folders and in displays around the school. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders and middle leaders. Inspectors also talked to a wide group of staff. The lead inspector met two members of the governing body, including the chair of governors. The lead inspector also met a representative of the Northern Education Trust. Inspectors met groups of pupils in key stages 3 and 4. They also talked less formally to pupils in lessons and around the school site about aspects of their learning, behaviour and safety. Inspectors looked at the school’s work and considered documents including the school’s own evaluation of its work, the school improvement plan, curriculum plans and
p.10
Information about this inspection
information relating to pupils’ achievement and safeguarding. Inspectors took into account 31 responses to Ofsted’s online Parent View questionnaire, 21 free text responses, 83 responses to the pupil questionnaire and 35 responses to the staff questionnaire.
p.10
Inspection team
Malcolm Kirtley, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Julia Wright Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion