Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership

Inspected 9 May 2016 · published 10 Jan 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Tomkow (lead), Mark Sims

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 May 2016

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Mark Sims, Paul Tomkow

  • Name on report verified

    Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingpositivehigh-qualityeffectivestronghighly effectivesuccessfulhigh expectations
Criticismrequires improvementinadequateweaknessat riskdisruptionnot alwaysharmnot well prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings127w+25
  • What needs to improve1648w+57

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,758
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 71%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership Initial teacher education inspection report Inspection dates Stage 1: 9 May 2016 Stage 2: 14 November 2016

p.1

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection handbook’. This handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2015.

p.1

The inspection draws on evidence from each phase within the ITE partnership to make judgements against all parts of the evaluation schedule. Inspectors focused on the overall effectiveness of the ITE partnership in securing high-quality outcomes for trainees.

p.1

Inspection judgements

Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding; grade 2 is good; grade 3 is requires improvement; grade 4 is inadequate.

p.1

Inspection judgements

Primary and Secondary QTS Overall effectiveness How well does the partnership secure consistently high quality outcomes for trainees? The outcomes for trainees 2 The quality of training across the partnership The quality of leadership and management across the partnership ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016

p.1

Information about this ITE partnership

 The Stourport school-centred initial teacher training partnership (SCITT) provides teacher training for graduates who wish to teach in the primary or secondary phase. It is part of the Stourport Teaching School Alliance and is based on the site of The Stourport High School & VIth Form College. It has provided ITE since September 2014.  There are nine primary schools and 12 secondary schools in the partnership. Trainees can opt to train in either the primary (5–11) or the secondary (11–19) phase.  Trainees who successfully complete their training are recommended for qualified teacher status (QTS). The SCITT also offers trainees the opportunity to qualify for a postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) through a partnership with Birmingham City University.  An executive board oversees policy and strategy and has representation from leaders in both phases.  The partnership has not previously been inspected.

p.2

Information about the primary and secondary ITE inspection

 During stage 1, the inspectors visited seven schools. Eight trainees were observed teaching and receiving feedback from their mentors. Inspectors held discussions with trainees, mentors and headteachers. A training session was also observed. Inspectors reviewed evidence in trainees’ files in relation to the teachers’ standards and documentation relating to the SCITT’s compliance with the initial teacher training (ITT) criteria.

p.2

Information about the primary and secondary ITE inspection

 During stage 2 of the inspection, inspectors observed 10 former trainees in their schools. They met with newly qualified teacher (NQT) mentors and headteachers in schools. They also met with a group of mentors and spoke with former trainees, now in the second year of their careers.

p.2

Information about the primary and secondary ITE inspection

 Across both stages of the inspection, the inspectors met with course leaders and members of the executive board. Inspectors reviewed a range of documentation, including improvement plans, self-evaluation, training documents, recruitment and selection policies and records, trainees’ files, their assessment information, and the partnership’s analysis of trainees’ outcomes.

p.2

Inspection team

Paul Tomkow Her Majesty’s Inspector (lead inspector) Mark Sims Her Majesty’s Inspector (assistant lead inspector) ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016

p.2

are:

 The strong collaboration between SCITT leaders and partnership schools and the shared commitment to continuous improvement.  The full commitment of partner schools to the design and delivery of the programme.  Effective personal, professional and academic support, from leaders and mentors, which results in trainees’ good outcomes and high completion rates.  Above average employment rates; many newly qualified teachers (NQTs) gained employment in partnership schools, which demonstrates the confidence that headteachers have in the quality of the training programmes.  Trainees awarded QTS begin their careers as newly qualified teachers with positive attitudes and the skills and abilities necessary to develop into very effective teachers.  High-quality school-based training, which uses the expertise of teachers to help trainees to develop a good understanding of the subjects that they are training to teach.

p.3

are:

 Trainees and NQTs are proud to be associated with the Stourport SCITT. They are highly positive about their experience as they feel that it prepares them well for a career in teaching.  Rigorous self-evaluation and detailed improvement planning ensures that good outcomes are sustained and in many cases improved upon. The partnership demonstrates the capacity for continuous self-improvement.

p.3

The partnership should:

 Improve the accuracy of the judgements that are made about the quality of trainees’ teaching by taking full account of the impact that it has on pupils’ progress.  Improve arrangements for supporting trainees as they move into employment by providing sharper targets at the end of the training to help trainees develop their teaching.  Ensure that high quality-training equips trainees well to teach pupils who speak English as an additional language. ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016

p.3

Inspection judgements

1. Good leadership, close links with partner schools, effective training programmes and supportive pastoral systems have resulted in Stourport SCITT making strong progress since it was formed in 2014. As a result, it has made a positive contribution to meeting the demand for good and better primary and secondary teachers in the local area.

p.4

Inspection judgements

2. The recruitment and selection process is rigorous and helps to ensure that each trainee recruited to the SCITT has both the potential and the skills required to become a successful teacher. Headteachers, and other senior leaders from partnership schools, are fully involved in the interview and assessment processes. This helps to ensure that only those applicants who demonstrate a genuine commitment to the teaching profession are offered places on the course.

p.4

Inspection judgements

3. Course leaders have ensured that there is appropriate academic rigour in the training programme. Trainees are encouraged to constantly reflect on their teaching through discussions with mentors, and through school- and centre- based training sessions. All trainees who achieved QTS in 2016 successfully completed the PGCE course with Birmingham City University.

p.4

Inspection judgements

4. Leaders track the progress of trainees carefully in relation to the teachers’ standards. Some assessments of trainees’ standards do not take full account of the impact of their teaching on pupils’ progress. Nonetheless, leaders ensure that trainees are challenged to improve their practice and receive additional support when required. As a result, all trainees exceed the minimum level of practice expected of teachers at the end of their training. They demonstrate high standards of personal and professional conduct. Much of the trainees’ teaching is good by the time they start their first year of teaching.

p.4

Inspection judgements

5. Leaders and mentors provide highly effective personal, professional and academic support. Trainees value the course and appreciate the support they receive, including helpful feedback on their performance from their mentors. There are clear procedures for intervening early should trainees experience any problems, whether academic or pastoral. During discussions, trainees and NQTs said that the quality of pastoral support is a significant factor in the high completion rates seen at the SCITT over the past two years.

p.4

Inspection judgements

6. Trainees and NQTs understand the importance of supporting disadvantaged pupils in order to help them to improve their progress so that their attainment matches more closely that of their peers. They also develop an understanding of how best to support pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. However, trainees are not as well prepared to support the learning of pupils who speak English as an additional language. Although leaders have recognised this weakness and made changes to the course this year it is too early to judge the impact of their actions. ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016 7. Trainees and NQTs, in both the primary and secondary phases, rate highly the training that they receive and say that they would not hesitate to recommend the SCITT to others considering a career in teaching. This is reflected in the extremely positive responses to the latest NQT survey. Trainees particularly

p.4

Inspection judgements

praise the way the course is structured to give a good balance between theory and practice. The training sessions held at the centre help trainees to gain a good understanding of what it means to be a teacher and wider aspects of the role, including supporting transition between key stages and the emotional well-being of pupils. Every trainee and NQT spoken to, and those responding to surveys, expressed confidence that their training will prepare them well to become a good or outstanding teacher.

p.5

Inspection judgements

8. Trainees in the primary phase are well prepared to teach phonics (letters and the sounds they make) and other aspects of early reading. The training provided in mathematics is also effective and helps trainees to develop a good understanding of the concepts that underpin successful learning. Trainees and NQTs value the subject-specific sessions in the wider curriculum. Primary trainees are provided with a good balance of practice and theory in physical education and said that the science training was particularly useful. Secondary trainees and NQTs valued highly the subject support that they received through school-based training in their departments.

p.5

Inspection judgements

9. Effective behaviour management forms an integral part of the training programme and was a particular strength in many of the lessons seen during stage 2 of the inspection. The NQTs who were observed had quickly established clear rules and routines based on high expectations of pupils, respectful relationships and school policies. On the few occasions where pupils’ behaviour fell below the expected standard, NQTs mostly dealt with these minor issues well, with little disruption to the learning of the rest of the class.

p.5

Inspection judgements

10. NQTs who trained with this SCITT make a strong contribution to the supply of good and better teachers in schools. In 2016, all 18 trainees gained employment at the end of their training, most in partnership schools.

p.5

Inspection judgements

11. Trainees have the opportunity to experience contrasting school placements. Although most partnership schools are good or outstanding, some trainees have the opportunity to gain practical experience of working in schools judged as requires improvement or special measures. Trainees also undertake a range of additional visits to primary, secondary and special schools. These visits help trainees to develop an understanding of working in different contexts. ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016 12. Leaders are ambitious for the SCITT to improve further. They share a passion with leaders across the partnership schools for developing good and better teachers. Leaders’ commitment to continuous improvement shines through the high-quality course documentation. Their plans for improvement are comprehensive and reflect a range of internal and external views. Leaders are constantly looking for ways to improve. They take swift action to bring about

p.5

Inspection judgements

positive change and demonstrate good capacity to improve.

p.6

Inspection judgements

13. Trainees and NQTs understand their responsibilities for safeguarding pupils. They have a well-developed knowledge about the risks that children may face because safeguarding has a high priority throughout the training. Trainees receive a wide range of safeguarding training, which includes the ‘Prevent’ duty, and understand the importance of promoting British values. Trainees and NQTs are knowledgeable about the signs that might suggest a child is at risk of harm. Most are skilled at promoting children’s positive behaviour and understand the importance of strategies to promote pupils’ self-esteem and prevent, or address, incidents of bullying.

p.6

Inspection judgements

14. The partnership’s information on trainees’ attainment is broadly accurate and all trainees demonstrate good or better teaching skills. However, sometimes the grades awarded to trainees are overgenerous, particularly those on the boundary between good and outstanding. This means that the judgements do not always accurately reflect the quality of trainees’ teaching at the end of the training year.

p.6

Inspection judgements

15. Detailed records summarise the trainees’ strengths and any areas that require further development at the end of the course. However, trainees’ targets are not sharply formulated to help leaders in employing schools to understand what is needed to improve NQTs’ competence in planning, teaching and assessment. As a result, this information is not used effectively to help NQTs focus on precisely what they need to do to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment further as they begin their career.

p.6

Inspection judgements

16. The partnership fully complies with the ITT criteria. It also meets all relevant safeguarding and other statutory requirements for promoting equality and diversity, and eliminating discrimination. ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016

p.6

Annex: Partnership schools

The following schools were visited to observe trainees’ and newly qualified teachers’ (NQTs’) teaching:

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

King Charles I School and Sixth Form Centre, Kidderminster

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

St Ambrose’s Catholic Primary School, Kidderminster

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

St John’s CE Primary School, Kidderminster

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

Stourport Primary School, Stourport-on-Severn

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

St Thomas More Catholic School, Willenhall

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

The Stourport High School & VIth Form College, Stourport-on-Severn

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

Wilden All Saints CE Primary School, Stourport-on-Severn

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

Wolverley CE Secondary School, Kidderminster ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016

p.7

ITE partnership details

Unique reference number Inspection number Inspection dates Stage 1 Stage 2 Lead inspector Type of ITE partnership Phases provided Date of previous inspection Previous inspection report

p.8

ITE partnership details

Provider address 9–11 May 2016 14–16 November 2016 Paul Tomkow, HMI SCITT Primary and secondary Not previously inspected Not applicable

p.8

ITE partnership details

The Stourport High School & VIth Form College, Minster Road, Stourport-on- Severn, DY13 8AX ITE inspection report: Stourport SCITT ITE Partnership November 2016 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format

p.8

ITE partnership details

or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

ITE partnership details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

ITE partnership details

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion