Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Barton-le-Clay Pre-School

Inspected 9 Dec 2016 · published 23 Dec 2016 · URN EY406810

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Rachel Pepper

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Barton-le-Clay Pre-School Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP518970

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Dec 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Rachel Pepper

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    MK45 4NS

  • Name on report verified

    Barton-le-Clay Pre-School

  • URN verified

    EY406810

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 77% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseambitiouseffectivelyenthusiasticsecurestronglysuccessfuleffectiveconsistently
Criticismweaknessesnot consistentlynot effectiveat risknot yetcompromisednot alwaysharm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings363w−7
  • Leadership249w−26
  • What needs to improve453w−15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,053
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
19%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 22%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 27%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Barton-le-Clay Pre-School Manor Road, Barton-le-Clay, BEDFORD, MK45 4NS

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 9 December 2016 9 May 2013

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The provider has not ensured that all staff have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues or ensured that her own knowledge is current.  The provider has not taken swift enough action to provide Ofsted with the requested information about members of the voluntary committee, in order to complete full and relevant checks.  Staff sometimes do not use the information gained from assessments of children's learning effectively. They do not consistently identify where children can be challenged further or where they require additional support. Staff working with younger children do not always understand the expectation to focus on the prime areas of learning.  The arrangements for supervision do not provide less-qualified staff with coaching to improve their personal effectiveness or develop their knowledge of the seven areas of learning.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The provider is enthusiastic in her role and has an ambitious vision. She ensures children have plentiful opportunities to engage their curiosity and imagination in the natural environment. For example, outdoors, children make pretend birthday cakes using saucepans and mud, placing sticks carefully to represent candles.  Some aspects of the key-person system are suitable. Staff work closely with parents to help children experience a smooth move into the pre-school and develop secure attachments to staff. Some of the ways they do this are through gathering detailed information during home visits and inviting parents to view the pre-school in action during a welcome week.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 gain an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues and ensure staff receive training that enables them to identify signs of possible abuse and neglect at the earliest opportunity 09/01/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that Ofsted is provided with the necessary information as requested to enable them to carry out suitability checks on all members of the voluntary committee 09/01/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure staff working with the youngest children focus strongly on the three prime areas to form the basis of successful future learning 09/01/2017

p.2

Due Date

 make more consistent, effective use of ongoing assessments to consistently consider children's individual levels of achievement and then shape learning experiences for each child 09/01/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure the supervision arrangements provide coaching for less- qualified staff to improve their personal effectiveness and develop their knowledge of the seven areas of learning. 09/01/2017

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the provider and held discussions with the provider, members of staff and children.  The inspector held a meeting with the provider. She discussed self-evaluation and looked at relevant documentation, such as policies, staff files and children's learning records. She also viewed an online learning system.  The inspector spoke to a number of parents and took account of their views.  The inspector saw evidence of the suitability of all persons working on the premises and some documentation in relation to the safeguarding and welfare requirements.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The provider has not maintained an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding practice. Therefore, she is not alert to all of the safeguarding indicators that may place a child at risk of harm. Staff have not received training to update their safeguarding knowledge. This means that both the provider and her team of staff are not able to respond to safeguarding issues in a timely or appropriate way. This has a significant impact on the safety and well-being of children. All adults working directly with children have undergone full suitability checks. However, the provider has been aware since May that she needs to provide further information to Ofsted to carry out full and relevant checks on two members of the voluntary committee. Although some attempts have been made, she has taken too little action to provide Ofsted with the requested information. Staff welcome the views of parents and some changes

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

following feedback are evident. For example, parents say that the home-communication books and provision of a large whiteboard in the entrance have increased lines of communication. The provider has some support from a local adviser and action plans are in place. This includes developing use of an online learning system and further enhancing the outdoor areas. However, the current processes she uses for evaluation do not assure that all weaknesses are swiftly identified or that children's overall progress is monitored accurately. As a result, actions are needed to ensure all legal requirements are met.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Staff do not consistently use the information from children's assessments to accurately track their progress or prioritise areas for development. Less-qualified staff working with younger children have limited knowledge of the areas of learning and the expectation to focus on the prime areas. This does not help young children to secure the foundations for future learning. Much focus is placed on supporting children's use of numbers and the recognition of shapes and colours from a young age. All staff routinely observe children and on some occasions identify appropriate next steps for them to achieve. The provider has recognised there are weaknesses in staff practice but is still at the early stages of addressing these. Supervision arrangements are not yet used effectively to coach staff who need the most support. Some aspects of teaching are good. Staff provide children with clear information about available activities and organise the environment well. This

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

enables children to make choices in their play. Children practise a range of physical skills. They spread butter on crackers and choose seeds to sprinkle as they assemble home- made bird feeders. Children concentrate and are encouraged by staff to use their thinking skills to complete simple computer programs.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Children's safety and well-being are compromised due to the weaknesses in leadership and management. However, children clearly enjoy their time at the pre-school. They are keen to learn and explore the stimulating indoor and outdoor areas. Staff follow suitable strategies to teach children acceptable ways to behave. Children listen to staff and learn how to share and take turns with their friends. They show awareness of the daily routines and know to wash their hands before they eat. Staff provide activities to help children learn about healthy choices. For example, they encourage children to try new tastes and complete experiments to identify the levels of sugar in popular drinks.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

The weaknesses in staff's knowledge and their use of assessments mean that children are not yet making good enough progress. However, some children in receipt of funding and those who speak English as an additional language are supported well. They benefit from activity bags to take home and targeted programmes to support their speech and language development. Children acquire some of the basic skills they need in readiness for school. They use number names in sequence, solve problems and develop pencil control. Children manage the responsibility of small tasks. They clear away after mealtimes and concentrate as they locate and measure the correct-sized boots before outdoor play.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY406810 Local authority Central Bedfordshire Inspection number 1065495 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 42 Number of children on roll 54 Name of registered person Barton-le-Clay Pre-School Committee

p.5

reference number

Date of previous inspection 9 May 2013 Telephone number 01582 883238

p.5

reference number

Barton-le-Clay Pre-School was registered in 2010 and is situated in purpose built premises within the grounds of Ramsey Manor Lower School. It is managed by a voluntary management committee. The pre-school employs 13 members of childcare staff. Of these, eight hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 or above. The setting opens Monday to Friday, during term time only. Sessions are from 9am until midday and from midday until 3pm. The setting provides funded early education for two-, three- and four- year-old children. It supports a small number of children who speak English as an additional language.

p.5

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion