Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Portland Place Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Portland Place Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP530988
- Inspection date verified
23 Nov 2016
- Inspectors verified
Judith Rayner
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DN22 8PP
- Name on report verified
Portland Place Pre-School
- URN verified
EY434128
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The leaders and the manager are not fully effective in monitoring and supporting staff performance to consistently improve the quality of teaching. p.1
- Children make some progress but are often not challenged enough to extend their learning as far as possible. p.1
- The quality of teaching is inconsistent. p.1
- Not all staff anticipate and reduce the negative impact on children's learning when changes in daily routines, such as snack time, occur. p.1
- Leaders and the manager do not use the self-evaluation process as effectively as possible. p.1
- They do not quickly identify and address areas for development, such as weaknesses in teaching, in order to improve the outcomes for children. p.1
- Children are well cared for by the staff. p.1
- They are happy and settled and display a sense of belonging. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“Leaders and the manager do not use the self-evaluation process as effectively as possible.” p.1Communication & language3
“Staff support children's communication and language skills appropriately.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 829
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Portland Place Pre-School Sutton cum Lound C of E School, Portland Place, Sutton, RETFORD, Nottinghamshire, DN22 8PP
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 23 November 2016 11 October 2013
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The leaders and the manager are not fully effective in monitoring and supporting staff performance to consistently improve the quality of teaching. Children make some progress but are often not challenged enough to extend their learning as far as possible. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Not all staff anticipate and reduce the negative impact on children's learning when changes in daily routines, such as snack time, occur. Leaders and the manager do not use the self-evaluation process as effectively as possible. They do not quickly identify and address areas for development, such as weaknesses in teaching, in order to improve the outcomes for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are well cared for by the staff. They are happy and settled and display a sense of belonging. They have positive relationships with the staff and other children. Staff help children to develop their social skills. Children learn to share toys, take turns and play together. Children quickly learn what is expected of them. Staff are consistent in the way they calmly manage any unwanted behaviour. Staff work well in partnership with parents, in order to support children's well-being and learning. For example, information about children's progress is shared regularly and parents are given ideas of how they can support their child's learning at home. Records are kept accurately and policies and procedures are implemented appropriately to underpin practice. Policies meet requirements and are shared with parents.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
monitor staff performance more effectively in order to identify and address inconsistencies in teaching practice 24/02/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve teaching so that children benefit from good quality adult guidance during daily routines and activities and are given suitable levels of challenge that enables them to consistently make good, or better, progress in their learning and development. 24/02/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
develop more effective self-evaluation processes and use the information gained to drive improvement, particularly in teaching.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager. The inspector viewed all areas of the premises used by the children, including the outdoor environment. The inspector held a meeting with the manager. The inspector spoke with the staff, the head teacher of the host school and children, at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken to on the day of inspection. The inspector looked at evidence of the suitability of staff working in the pre-school and the suitability of committee members. The inspector looked at children's records, the planning documentation and a variety of policies and procedures.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders and the manager do not focus carefully enough on developing the quality of teaching. They do not effectively monitor how staff interact with children in order to support, challenge and extend their learning. Ongoing self-evaluation is not sufficiently focused on improving children's level of achievement or on quickly identifying areas of weakness in teaching. Safeguarding is effective. Vetting procedures are robust to help ensure staff and committee members are suitable. Staff are clear about their roles and responsibilities to help protect children. They complete regular training in order to keep updated with current government guidance, policies and procedures. Staff have established partnerships with the local school where children will attend in the future. They ensure that they work well together so that all children get the support they need and are ready for the next stage in their learning.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching is inconsistent. On some occasions, staff do not quickly recognise how routines and changes in play activities have a negative impact on children's learning. Children lose focus and are not engaged in purposeful activity during these disorganised times. Nevertheless, the well-qualified staff do complete observations and make precise assessments of children's progress. Activities are planned in order to build on children's interests and the next steps in their learning. However, the activities planned are not always challenging enough for the children taking part, so they do not support them well enough to learn as much as possible. At times the quality of teaching is good. Staff use construction activities well to build on children's mathematical skills. They ask questions and give children time to come up with their own problem-solving ideas. Staff support children's communication and language skills appropriately. They provide activities, such
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
as singing, for children to listen to and use words and build their vocabulary.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Weaknesses in some staff's teaching mean that children do not consistently make good progress in developing their personal and physical skills. Overall, staff are warm and welcoming. They offer a supportive and flexible settling-in process and children feel welcome and comfortable in the pre-school. Key persons have an overall awareness of their children's interests and capabilities and understand how to meet their individual care and welfare needs. This contributes to their well-being and as a result, their confidence grows. Children routinely play and explore outdoors, which promotes their good health effectively. Staff plan activities that help children learn about people from different backgrounds. For example, children bring in photographs of their homes and talk about different ways of living from their own.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Weaknesses in teaching mean that children are not consistently making good progress from their starting points. Nevertheless, they do make some steady progress and are gaining useful skills in preparation for starting school. Children select toys and activities by themselves and are learning to socialise and play in larger groups.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY434128 Local authority Nottinghamshire Inspection number 1065744 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 20 Number of children on roll 29 Name of registered person Portland Place Pre-School Committee
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 11 October 2013 Telephone number 01777 705 990
p.4
reference number
Portland Place Pre-School was registered in 2012. The pre-school employs four members of childcare staff, all of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday during term time. Sessions are from 8.45am until 3pm. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion