Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Abbey Kindergarten Pre- School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Abbey Kindergarten (Playgroup) Committee
- Group reference verified
RP904545
- Inspection date verified
14 Nov 2016
- Inspectors verified
Julie Meredith-Jenkins
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
NR18 0UR
- Name on report verified
Abbey Kindergarten Pre- School
- URN verified
253988
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not consistently use the observations and assessments they make of children's achievements to identify highly targeted and focused plans for their learning. p.1
- Sometimes, children do not always maintain high levels of concentration in activities. p.1
- The key-person system in the setting is not always fully effective in helping children to be highly confident in social situations and to have a go at new experiences. p.1
- The recently implemented system for the supervision and support of staff is still in its early stages. p.1
- It has not yet had a positive effect on achieving continued improvement to the quality of teaching in the setting. p.1
- The manager's evaluation of the provision is not yet critical and precise enough across all areas of provision to secure continuous and timely improvements. p.1
- Staff share information with parents about children's learning and are quick to raise any concerns about children's development with them. p.1
- Parents value the exchange of information and comment positively about the setting. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 851
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 22%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Abbey Kindergarten Pre- School Ketts Park Community Recreaction Centre, Harts Farm Road, The Loke, WYMONDHAM, Norfolk, NR18 0UR
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 14 November 2016 26 April 2016
p.1
3
Previous inspection: Requires Improvement
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Staff do not consistently use the observations and assessments they make of children's achievements to identify highly targeted and focused plans for their learning. Sometimes, children do not always maintain high levels of concentration in activities. The key-person system in the setting is not always fully effective in helping children to be highly confident in social situations and to have a go at new experiences. The recently implemented system for the supervision and support of staff is still in its early stages. It has not yet had a positive effect on achieving continued improvement to the quality of teaching in the setting. The manager's evaluation of the provision is not yet critical and precise enough across all areas of provision to secure continuous and timely improvements.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff share information with parents about children's learning and are quick to raise any concerns about children's development with them. Parents value the exchange of information and comment positively about the setting. Staff are suitable role models and encourage children to be kind to each other and share resources. They regularly praise children for being kind to their friends.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure activities planned for children are tailored to their levels of development and provide them with additional challenge to help them to achieve the next steps in their learning 14/02/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure all children are allocated a key person throughout their time at the setting who can offer a settled relationship, and ensure that children are emotionally well prepared to proceed on to the next stages in their learning 14/12/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure the current system of supervision and support given to staff is effectively established in practice and helps staff to continually improve the quality of their teaching. 14/02/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
implement a system of more critical evaluation of the quality of provison and develop a targeted plan to achieve more sustained and concertive improvements.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint observation with the kindergarten manager. The inspector held a meeting with the kindergarten manager and provider. She looked at relevant documentation, such as the kindergarten's self-evaluation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the kindergarten. The inspector sampled a range of other documentation, including the learning and development records of children, the kindergarten's policies and procedures and risk assessments. The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Leaders and managers have addressed weaknesses raised at the previous inspection, however, they have failed to maintain continuous improvement in other areas of provision. Staff lack confidence in some areas of their practice, such as in their activity planning for children. They do not always provide children with highly interesting and challenging opportunities. The manager has recently introduced more-focused supervision and support for staff. However, this has not yet had a positive effect on raising the quality of teaching to higher levels. Safeguarding is effective. Staff have completed training in safeguarding practice and procedures. They understand how to report any concerns they have about children's welfare. The manager continues to monitor practice and develop plans for improvement. However, this is not robust in evaluating the effectiveness and quality of provision to ensure continuous improvement across all areas of the practice is achieved.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff do not have high enough expectations for what children can achieve. While they plan to support children's interests and general enjoyment, they do not always provide opportunities to extend and enhance their learning. Staff do not always have highly targeted plans for how they can extend and enhance children's learning. Activities sometimes lack challenge and children do not always engage in meaningful learning opportunities for prolonged periods. Children move around the setting choosing what they want to do. They enjoy playing with a train track as they join up a long line of trains and wheel them along a track. They use blocks to build small structures but there is little focus or challenge in their learning and they quickly become disinterested and move on to another activity. Children's engagement and concentration is not fully supported by good quality learning experiences.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Children's emotional security is not fully promoted in the setting and sometimes, staff are not always responsive to supporting children in settling according to their individual needs. During staff's prolonged periods of absence, less-confident children do not always form a secure bond with another key person in the setting to use as a secure base. They become less well settled and confident in their surroundings. Staff are warm and kind to children. They treat children with respect and regularly engage them in conversations where children enjoy to talk about their home life. Staff talk to children and take an interest in their lives beyond the setting. This supports children's self-esteem and helps them to feel valued. Healthy eating is promoted in the setting and children benefit from physical play opportunities both indoors and outside.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children's progress is not yet good enough to ensure they are well prepared for the next stage in their learning, such as school. They do not always demonstrate high levels of focus in their learning. They often move around from activity to activity without becoming deeply involved in learning. Sometimes, children lack enthusiasm for learning. Despite this, they generally enjoy their time in the setting and develop good social skills.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 253988 Local authority Norfolk Inspection number 1053493 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 16 Name of registered person Abbey Kindergarten (Playgroup) Committee
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 26 April 2016 Telephone number 07941 284 143
p.4
reference number
Abbey Kindergarten Pre-School was registered in 1992. The kindergarten employs four members of childcare staff. Of these, three hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The kindergarten opens from Monday to Friday during term time. Sessions are from 9am until midday. The kindergarten provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion