Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Lewisham

Inspected 28 Nov 2016 · published 7 Dec 2016 · URN EY316346

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jenny Griffiths

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Nov 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Jenny Griffiths

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY316346

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−63Very criticalmore positive than 21% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhappysettledsecurerobuststrengthssafepromptly
Criticismweakat riskweaknessesfailedconcernsbreachesineffectiveserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings292w−56
  • Leadership136w−86
  • What needs to improve326w−35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
743
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 27%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 28 November 2016 5 August 2015

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Previous inspection: Requires Improvement

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not keep her knowledge of safeguarding matters up to date. Her understanding of who to contact to report concerns about a child's welfare is weak. This puts children at risk.  Risk assessment processes are not rigorous. The childminder does not understand how to identify potential hazards and minimise risks to keep children safe.  Some children do not make sufficient progress from their starting points. The childminder does not organise space and resources effectively to give babies enough opportunities to play and explore freely.  The childminder does not follow good hygiene practices. Children do not have separate bedding and they do not learn about the importance of hand washing to prevent the spread of germs and infection.  Self-evaluation is weak and the provider has failed to identify breaches of the Early Years Register and the Childcare Register. She has failed to meet all recommendations

p.1

This provision is inadequate

set at the last inspection and her practice has deteriorated.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder has established close relationships with children and they are happy and settled.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 gain an up-to-date knowledge and a secure understanding of safeguarding matters including protecting children from being drawn into extreme ideas and behaviours 28/12/2016

p.2

Due Date

 develop robust risk assessment procedures to ensure that any hazards are promptly identified and risks are effectively managed 28/12/2016

p.2

Due Date

 plan and organise the environment to ensure that babies have sufficient space to move around freely as they play and select resources 28/12/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve procedures to prevent the spread of infection, with particular regard to providing individual bedding for children and helping them to learn about good hygiene procedures. 28/12/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 improve the self-evaluation process to help identify breaches in legal requirements and plan for improvement.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector carried out a tour of the premises with the childminder.  The inspector observed how the childminder plays and interacts with children, and discussed how she assesses and plans for children's learning.  The inspector discussed how the childminder makes use of self-evaluation to improve the provision and what progress she has made since the last inspection.  The inspector sampled documentation including policies, procedures and children's records.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder has not kept her knowledge of safeguarding issues up to date and does not know how to recognise the signs that a child may be at risk from extreme views and behaviours. She is not clear about procedures for reporting any serious concerns about children's welfare. The childminder does not identify hazards and manage risks within her home or communal areas. For example, stairwells and areas where children walk, play and rest are cluttered, toiletries are accessible to children and some resources are not stored safely. These weaknesses mean that children's safety cannot be assured. Self-evaluation processes are weak and the childminder has not identified breaches in requirements. She works with parents to ensure consistency for children, but does not seek their views to help her monitor and evaluate her provision.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The childminder does not plan and organise suitable spaces where babies can move around and choose resources freely. This was identified as a weakness at the last inspection. She provides appropriate support for younger children. For example, she supports their communication skills by speaking slowly and clearly to them so that they can understand her and learn new vocabulary. The childminder knows children's interests, strengths and weaknesses, and uses these to inform her planning. She supports children's social skills well. For example, she takes them to play groups and activities at museums. The childminder prepares older children for school. For example, she supports their literacy skills, encouraging them to write their names and link letters and sounds together.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

Weaknesses in safeguarding mean that children are put at risk. The childminder does not follow good hygiene routines and help children learn about personal hygiene and cleanliness. Children do not have individual bedding, which means that there is a risk of infection spreading. The childminder does not encourage children to wash their hands after using the toilet. The childminder warmly welcomes children as they arrive from school and listens to their comments about the day. Children are happy and settled. The childminder helps children to learn about similarities and differences. For example, she provides books about other cultures and festivals which she reads and discusses with children.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Outcomes for children are inconsistent. The poor organisation of the childminder's home means that babies do not have sufficient space to explore and learn or suitable opportunities to make choices about their play. Older children have better learning opportunities. For example, they develop secure mathematical skills and, at the inspection, they enjoyed counting the number of letters and adding them together to find out the total.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY316346 Local authority Lewisham Inspection number 1057705 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 3 Number of children on roll 6

p.4

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 5 August 2015

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2008. She lives in the London Borough of Lewisham. Her provision operates Monday to Friday from 8.30am to 6.30pm, with the exception of bank holidays.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion