Social care · Social care interim inspection
Children's Home run by Suffolk County Council in Suffolk
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
3 Nov 2016
- Inspectors verified
Ashley Hinson
- Postcode verified
IP1 2BX
- URN verified
SC037256
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is in relation to completing comprehensive impact assessments and individual risk assessments. 28/11/2016 p.5
- Ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority enables the home to take account of information provided by return interviews when assessing risks and putting arrangements in place to protect each child. p.6
- At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.7
- This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection’. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance10
“However, there are times when the management team has shown a lack of curiosity.” p.3Health & safety3
“Risk assessments have been updated.” p.3Staff development2
“The staff received training in” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,120
- about usual (typical 904)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of
children and young people since the most recent full inspection. This home was judged requires improvement at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness . The management team needs to make further improvements to ensure that the children receive a good service. The staff continue to work with children who have complex and challenging needs. The children who have moved on have done so because of deterioration in their behaviour rather than through the fruition of their care plans. The management team completes impact assessments to inform decisions about whether they should accommodate a child in the home. However, a recent impact assessment does not consider the potential risk of bullying, despite this being a clear risk. This does not safeguard children or contribute to effective planning. The progress that the children have made in the three months since the last
p.2
The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of
inspection is limited. Although some children have greater engagement with education services, there has been a deterioration in behaviour for other children. The management team identified the need to make improvements in relation to the children’s education. One child is maintaining full-time attendance at school and another has increased the frequency and duration of their attendance. The staff do not consistently sign the entries that they make on children’s case files. This could hamper any future analysis of records, making it difficult to identify which member of staff has made the recording. There has been a significant increase in incidents of bullying. The management team held a multi-agency strategy meeting to attempt to address this after earlier interventions produced little impact. It is too soon to fully assess the effectiveness of the actions following the meeting, although there has been an immediate
p.2
The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of
decrease in observable bullying. There continue to be a significant number of incidents of children going missing. The staff and management team work closely with the local police to respond to these incidents. The police are very positive about the home, with one officer stating, ‘We have a good relationship. Over the past couple of months I have definitely seen improvements.’ A local police community support officer said, ‘They are cooperative and provide the information we need. I have no criticism of the way in which the staff care for the children. The children’s needs are very well catered for.’ The staff are still struggling to access copies of return from going missing interviews. However, the manager is actively pursuing this information and exploring ways to resolve the issue. The management team has met the majority of requirements and recommendations made at the last inspection. The staff received training in
p.2
The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of
managing self-harm and missing children. The manager has updated the children’s guide to reflect current practice. Risk assessments have been updated. However, they are not always sufficiently thorough. For example, the risk assessment for a new resident does not include key information pertaining to safer working practices. This does not fully safeguard children or staff. The management team has some awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of the service. However, there are times when the management team has shown a lack of curiosity. For example, in one case record there is reference to a child turning on a ‘sex channel’ in another child’s room, suggesting the potential for children to be able to access inappropriate channels on the televisions in their rooms. Despite this, there had been no further exploration of the incident to understand the issue or to prevent future occurrences. The management team has undertaken a review of the night-time staffing
p.3
The effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of
arrangements as recommended at the last inspection. However, night-time continues to be a time when the children’s behaviour is most difficult. The majority of incidents of children going missing occur after 10pm and almost all bullying incidents happen during the night shift. The staff recognise that this is a time of vulnerability but are unsure why. As a result, the service continues to struggle to manage challenging situations or children’s challenging behaviour effectively at night-time. Multi-agency working is strong. The management team has proactively promoted this. Monthly meetings take place with the police and other key professionals including neighbouring children’s homes. This enables the staff to have a wider contextual understanding of incidents and provides the potential for a better response to risks in the community.
p.3
Information about this children's home
This local authority home provides care and accommodation for seven children from the age of 11 to 18 years old. The home looks after children who have emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.4
Recent inspection history
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 20/07/2016 Full Requires improvement 09/03/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 03/11/2015 Full Requires improvement 26/03/2015 Interim Sustained effectiveness
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person(s) meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.5
Requirement Due date
11: The positive relationships standard In order to meet the positive relationships standard, with particular reference to managing children's challenging behaviour at night-time, the responsible person must ensure: (2)(a) that staff— (i) meet each child’s behavioural and emotional needs, as set out in the child’s relevant plans; (ii) help each child to develop socially aware behaviour; and (xi) de-escalate confrontations with or between children, or potentially violent behaviour by children. 28/11/2016
p.5
Requirement Due date
12: The protection of children standard In order to meet the protection of children standard, the registered provider must ensure: (2)(a)(i) that staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. This is in relation to completing comprehensive impact assessments and individual risk assessments. 28/11/2016
p.5
Requirement Due date
12: The protection of children standard In order to meet the protection of children standard, with particular regard to ensuring that the service understands what children can access from the televisions in their rooms, the registered provider must ensure: (2)(b) that the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. 28/11/2016 The registered person must maintain records (‘case records’) for each child which are signed and dated by the author of each entry. (Regulation 36 (1)(c)) 28/11/2016
p.5
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further, the service should take account of the following recommendation: Ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority enables the home to take account of information provided by return interviews when assessing risks and putting arrangements in place to protect each child. ('Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards', page 45, paragraph 9.30)
p.6
What the inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection’.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children's home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children's home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Information about this inspection
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.8
Information about this inspection
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Information about this inspection
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Information about this inspection
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion