Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Hugh Joicey Church of England Primary School, Ford

Inspected 2 Nov 2016 · published 30 Nov 2016 · URN 122291

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Belita Scott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Nov 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Belita Scott

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TD15 2QA

  • Name on report verified

    Hugh Joicey Church of England First School, Ford

  • URN verified

    122291

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2010.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexemplaryhighly skilledhappyrapid progresseffectiveimprovedenjoystrength
Criticismpoorrequires improvementlacknot consistentlynot strongnot make good progressnot yetnot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings653w−22
  • Leadership160w+21
  • Safeguarding152w+28
  • What needs to improve1578w+16

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,466
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 47%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Hugh Joicey Church of England First School, Ford Ford Village, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Northumberland TD15 2QA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Teaching is not consistently strong across the school.  Typically, the most able pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable because their work, especially in mathematics, is not sufficiently challenging.  Although diminishing, differences remain between the standards reached by disadvantaged pupils in the school and others nationally.  Pupils, especially boys in writing, do not make enough progress in key stage 1. Not all are ready for the demands of the Year 3 curriculum.  Pupils’ handwriting skills are poor. As a result, some of their work is not presented well.  Subject leadership is not consistently strong.  Efficient systems to track the attainment and progress of pupils are not embedded.  There is a lack of clarity about the identification of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  Governors do not have a clear understanding of any trends in incidents of poor behaviour

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

and the attainment and progress of pupils and groups of pupils in all year groups.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders and governors have welcomed and acted upon external support following the untimely death of the school’s much-loved headteacher.  Leaders’ evaluations of the quality of teaching, the standard of behaviour and outcomes for pupils in the school are accurate.  Actions undertaken to improve standards, by the acting headteacher and the new subject leader for mathematics, are beginning to bear fruit.  Pupils feel safe and protected in school. They are happy to attend and their parents ensure that they arrive on time. Pupils’ behaviour is good.  Children are ready to learn on entry to the Reception Year because their transition from the on-site, pre-school provision is seamless.  Pupils make rapid and sustained progress in Years 3 and 4. Teaching is closely tailored to their needs and adults’ expectations are high.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and learning across the school so that it is consistently good or better by ensuring that teachers: – increase their expectations of the most able pupils and provide challenging and thought-provoking work for them to tackle, especially in mathematics – plan learning activities which engage boys and enable them to make rapid progress, especially in writing – give high priority to the development of pupils’ basic skills, such as number formation, presentation and handwriting.  Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management at all levels by ensuring that: – the new systems and procedures to track the attainment and progress of pupils and groups of pupils are fully embedded – governors have regular access to succinct assessment information for each year group and the different pupil groups within the school – the coordinator for special educational needs (SENCo) and subject leaders have

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

opportunities to increase their expertise and are given dedicated time to monitor the impact of their actions on pupils’ progress – incidents of poor behaviour are analysed to identify and address trends. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The acting headteacher, who was formerly the part-time teacher of the Reception class, took up post formally in January 2016. Despite inexperience at senior leadership level, she has identified and started to tackle the most pressing areas for improvement while leading the whole school community through a period of mourning for a beloved headteacher.  The acting headteacher has begun to identify areas of stronger and weaker teaching and quickly provided support for staff where necessary.  Subject leadership in this small school is at an embryonic stage of development. Leaders of both English and mathematics have been in place since the beginning of the academic year and have already identified some of the areas that require improvement. Progress has been more rapid in mathematics. The leader has implemented a new policy for calculations and is providing support and advice across the school. However, a scrutiny of pupils’ mathematics workbooks during the inspection

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

revealed that pupils in Year 2 are unlikely to complete the required national curriculum content by the end of the academic year at the current rate of coverage.  Leaders, in recognition of slower progress made by boys in writing, have recently asked teachers to make lessons more physically active. Although, at an early stage of development, some progress has been noted in boys’ letter formation and handwriting.  Leaders have recently implemented a new system to track the attainment and progress of cohorts, groups and individual pupils. Although not yet embedded, leaders have identified which groups of pupils need additional help to catch up with their peers and have recently employed an additional teacher to support pupils’ progress in English and mathematics.  Leaders’ management of the additional funding for the small number of disadvantaged pupils has not ensured that they make good progress and attain standards in line with

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

or above other pupils nationally.  Sports funding is spent well to improve pupils’ skills and increase their engagement in physical activity. As a result, the number of pupils who attend extra-curricular clubs has increased by 30%. Pupils, who ‘like to keep fit’, use equipment purchased with the funding to skip and hula-hoop at breaktimes.  Leaders’ plans include the need to embed further spiritual, moral, social and cultural development across the curriculum. Pupils understand the need for rules and they value decisions that are made democratically. There is great kudos in being elected to the school council. Councillors take their role seriously as, evidenced in the minutes of school council meetings, which are displayed for all to read.  The acting headteacher has taken on the role of SENCo. She has diligently acquired some of the skills necessary to carry out the role on an interim basis but acknowledges

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

that further training is required to become fully proficient in the role. There is a lack of clarity between which pupils have special educational needs and/or disabilities and which pupils are low-attainers who need additional input to catch up quickly.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governors have a clear vision for the school. However, they have not challenged leaders strongly or systematically enough to improve the consistency of teaching across the school and outcomes for pupils in key stage 1.  Governors do not always understand the performance data presented to them by senior leaders. They have not ensured that they receive information regularly for all pupil groups, in all year groups throughout the school.  Governors have an improved understanding of the links between teachers’ performance and pay progression.  The chair of the governing body is determined to improve the impact of governance in the school. She fully appreciates the need for governors to be highly skilled and is leading the other governors by example. She has recently completed a range of online training and, as a result, plans to carry out an audit of governors’ skills before commissioning appropriate training to hone the skills of the rest of the governing body.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff attend training annually and receive regular updates from the acting headteacher. Staff and governors understand the risks of radicalisation and extremism.  Officers from the diocese carried out a comprehensive and accurate safeguarding audit of the school in June 2016. Leaders have taken effective action to improve aspects highlighted by the audit.  Adults work hard in this close community to ensure that vulnerable pupils are cared for well. The acting headteacher has established effective relationships with a range of outside agencies to ensure that pupils access the support that they need.  The school’s safeguarding policy was updated during the inspection to reflect most of the changes in the latest version of ‘Keeping children safe in education’.  Leaders keep thorough records of incidences of poor behaviour. However, they do not analyse this information for trends. Therefore, trends are not reported to governors.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not consistent across the school.  Over time, teachers do not provide sufficiently challenging work for the most able pupils, especially in mathematics.  Since September, teachers have planned more opportunities for pupils to be physically active. The impact of active learning in terms of progress has not yet been measured, but adults have identified that boys are enjoying their learning more.  Not all teachers are proficient at using the school’s tracking systems to identify which pupils and groups of pupils are making good or better progress. Similarly, not all teachers are using the agreed systems to assess pupils’ achievement in subjects other than English and mathematics.  Although teaching assistants are highly skilled, they are not consistently well deployed by all teachers.  Pupils enjoy science and would like to complete more practical investigations. Some of

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

the most able pupils told the inspector that they would like harder work which would make them think more deeply.  Teaching in phonics is a strength of the school, as is the development of early reading skills. Five out of the six pupils who read with the inspector during the inspection read books at just the right level of difficulty. They had to think hard to read some words but always used their knowledge of phonics to sound them out. The school makes effective provision for the most able readers. Provision for the least able readers in key stage 1 is not as effective.  Most pupils make good progress in key stage 2 because adults have high expectations of them. Pupils respond well to the challenging work that is set for them.  Pupils make more rapid progress when they are included in high-quality intervention activities after they are identified as requiring extra help. The quality of interventions in

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

key stage 2 is a strength of the school.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are happy in this caring school in which their emotional well-being is paramount. They responded maturely and with great sensitivity to their headteacher’s death during the summer holidays. Their commitment to Hospice Care Northumberland is exemplary.  Pupils understand the actions that constitute poor behaviour. They are not as readily aware of the actions that constitute bullying although, when reminded, could describe the rare occasions on which it had occurred in school.  Pupils enjoy taking on roles of responsibility. The ‘protector pal’ role is particularly coveted. Pupils enjoy wearing the high-visibility ‘protector pal’ jackets in the playground and are eager to help other pupils when the need arises.  Pupils have a good knowledge of how to stay safe from harm. They are knowledgeable about fire, road and water safety. However, they could not tell the inspector what

p.5

Personal development and welfare

actions they should take if a stranger asked to befriend them online.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils live up to the school’s mission statement: they are ‘happy, healthy, aspirational learners in a Christian community’.  The behaviours of the older pupils are exemplary. They are able role models for their younger friends in this caring school.  Pupils (and staff) communicate using sign language to ensure that all in their community are valued and included.  Although pupils’ absence and persistent absence increased during the last academic year, both are still below the national averages.  In key stage 1, pupils are noisy and fussy when changing from one activity to another. They take too long to get down to work and have not learned that every minute is vital.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils make good progress overall in Years 3 and 4. All achieve age-related expectations in English and mathematics at the end of first school. Most transfer to Berwick Middle School and also achieve age-related expectations at the end of key stage 2.  Fewer of the most able pupils exceed age-related expectations at the end of Year 4 in mathematics than in reading and writing.  Pupils’ attainment was broadly average in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 1 in 2014 and 2015. In 2016, pupils’ attainment was broadly average in reading and below average in writing and mathematics.  In 2016, disadvantaged pupils did not make good progress in key stage 1 from their starting points at the end of the early years. Their attainment was below average in reading, writing and mathematics because they did not make enough progress from their starting points at the end of the early years.  Boys’ attainment is lower than girls’ in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

key stage 1.  Attainment in phonics has been a strength of the school over time. However, the gap between the proportions of pupils who achieve the standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check in school and nationally is diminishing over time.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make small steps of progress in line with their identified needs as a result of closely targeted support.

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Adults provide an appropriate range of activities for children to access independently. However, adults do not focus enough on encouraging children to extend their language appropriately and sometimes misuse mathematical words such as ‘longer’ and ‘taller’.  The vast majority of children enter the Reception class with skills and attitudes typical for their age. They make steady progress during the year. Most are ready for the demands of the curriculum in Year 1 but too few of the most able children make good or better progress.  Leaders have not ensured that the classroom environment is resourced adequately for learning through play. For example, there is a lack of mark-making equipment in both the outdoor and indoor environments.  The welfare requirements of the early years foundation stage are met.  Children transfer seamlessly into the Reception class from the childcare provision which is based in the same building. They are comfortable in the environment, know the staff

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

and are ready to learn.  Leaders were unable to provide an analysis of the different outcomes for groups of children, such as boys and girls, for the cohort of pupils currently in Year 1. This lack of analysis prevents leaders from identifying the areas for further development in the early years.  The acting headteacher is currently leading the early years and astutely identified the strengths and areas for further development during observations of teaching and learning undertaken jointly with the inspector.  Current assessments of children’s abilities are accurate.  Pupils are happy in the Reception class and have formed strong relationships with the adults in the setting. They are kind to each other and play cooperatively.  Parents are positive about the school. Many attended parent/teacher consultation meetings during the inspection.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address admin@ford.northumberland.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 13–14 December 2010

p.8

Information about this school

 The headteacher died during the 2016 summer break following a long period of absence. The school has been led by an acting headteacher since January 2016.  There has been significant turbulence in the teaching staff in the past 12 months.  The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the attendance record of governors at full governing body and committee meetings on its website.  The school is much smaller than the average-sized primary school.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils, those eligible for support through pupil premium funding, is below average.  The overwhelming majority of pupils are of White British heritage.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities receiving support is well above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities with a statement of special

p.8

Information about this school

educational needs or an education, health and care plan is broadly average.  Children in the early years attend full-time provision in the Reception class. Inspection report: Hugh Joicey Church of England First School, Ford, 1–2 November 2016 Page 10 of 11

p.9

Information about this inspection

 The inspector visited six part-lessons, all of which were observed jointly with the acting headteacher.  Meetings were held with the acting headteacher and subject leaders, and six governors, including the chair of the governing body. The lead inspector also spoke with the school’s improvement officer from Northumberland local authority and a deputy director from the Church of England Diocese of Newcastle.  The inspector spoke informally to pupils in lessons and at various times during each day. She also spoke formally with a group of pupils from Years 2, 3 and 4.  Questionnaire returns submitted by 11 members of staff were taken into consideration.  The inspector scrutinised a range of pupils’ workbooks and information about pupils’ current progress. She also reviewed a number of documents, including the school’s improvement plan, attendance records, information relating to the work the school

p.10

Information about this inspection

does to keep pupils safe, headteacher’s reports to governors and minutes of meetings of the governing body.  The inspector took account of the views of 17 parents from the Ofsted online survey, Parent View, together with a survey of parental views provided by the school.  Pupils from Years 1, 2 and 3 read to the inspector.

p.10

Inspection team

Belita Scott, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Inspection report: Hugh Joicey Church of England First School, Ford, 1–2 November 2016 Page 11 of 11 guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion