Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Riverside School

Inspected 12 Oct 2016 · published 24 Nov 2016 · URN 102178

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Oct 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gaynor Roberts, Joan Deslandes

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    N22 5QJ

  • Name on report verified

    Riverside School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhighly effectivehigh qualitystronggood progressenthusiasticeffectiveconsistently
Criticismweakconcernsvariableabsencenot effectivelynot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1167w+28
  • What needs to improve100w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,258
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Martin Doyle Headteacher Riverside School White Hart Lane Wood Green London N22 5QJ

p.1

Short inspection of Riverside School

Following my visit to the school on 12 October 2016 with Joan Deslandes, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Riverside School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Riverside School

Senior leaders work well together to drive forward improvements in the school. They have clearly identified roles and responsibilities and communicate effectively with each other. Leaders and teachers work closely with professionals from other agencies to make sure that pupils’ health and care needs are well met. This enables pupils to make progress in all areas of their development.

p.1

Short inspection of Riverside School

Since the previous inspection, systems for assessing pupils’ progress have been significantly extended and revised. Led by one of your deputy headteachers, this work has transformed the way in which teachers use assessment. Teachers now plan sharply focused activities which enable pupils to make sound progress. As a result, the recommendation from the previous inspection that assessment information is shared better with teachers has been fully addressed.

p.1

Short inspection of Riverside School

Similarly, at the time of the last inspection you were asked to extend links with the co-located academy and local sixth form in order to broaden the range of learning opportunities for pupils. This recommendation has also been fully addressed. You work closely with the sixth form provider, which most of your pupils move on to after school. You are considering ways in which this work could be extended further to ensure that there is a local educational offer for young people up to the age of 25. Pupils from Riverside access the co-located academy as appropriate to their abilities and needs. Some classes are twinned with a class in the mainstream academy for projects. In addition, all Year 11 pupils are engaged in weekly work experience placements tailored to their individual interests, preferences and abilities.

p.1

Short inspection of Riverside School

Leaders and governors carefully monitor the school’s performance. They identified that the responsibilities of middle leaders were not structured as effectively as they would like and implemented a change in September 2016. This exemplifies senior leaders’ commitment to continual improvement.

p.2

Short inspection of Riverside School

Teachers and other staff members know pupils well and quickly recognise small changes in their behaviour or mood. They know what each pupil’s preferences are and meet their needs quickly. Adults use a range of strategies and resources to communicate with pupils, including objects, signing, electronic devices, symbols and text. The implementation of these strategies, however, is sometimes variable.

p.2

Short inspection of Riverside School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of a high quality.

p.2

Short inspection of Riverside School

Multi-agency meetings are held fortnightly in which professionals from health and social care agencies meet with school leaders to discuss any ongoing cases or emerging concerns. As a result, all professionals working with families are kept well informed and can pass on relevant information. Safeguarding issues are discussed at the start of every staff meeting, ensuring that these issues remain at the forefront of the school’s work.

p.2

Short inspection of Riverside School

Members of staff and governors attend regular training in relation to safeguarding and leaders have ensured that all adults in school have up-to- date knowledge about current issues such as female genital mutilation and the government’s ‘Prevent’ duty.

p.2

Short inspection of Riverside School

Pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe at a level they can understand. This includes lessons on e-safety and the development of routines such as wearing protective helmets when cycling.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The restructured middle leadership team are enthusiastic and experienced. They are excited about their new positions and have grasped the opportunity to take a more significant leadership role with relish. You have encouraged them to develop their own ideas. Already, they have established a strong team ethic within their departments. They can identify an increased focus on learning in some activities. For example, a sharp focus on developing the ability of a particular group of pupils to prepare and cook their own food during a residential visit. The middle leadership roles are newly established, however, and it is not possible to judge the full impact of these changes.  Leaders have introduced comprehensive systems for assessing exactly what pupils can do and what they need to learn next in a range of different subject areas. The assessments that teachers make are checked to ensure that they are correct. Consequently, senior leaders and

p.2

Inspection findings

governors can be sure that the information they receive is accurate.  Leaders and governors have refined the way that assessment information is presented this year to make sure that comparison is made between groups of pupils and others with similar ages and starting points. This has been a brave decision. It provides more sharply focused information which supports leaders as they improve the school further. The information shows that in 2016 very few pupils made weak progress in any aspect of the curriculum. Most pupils made good progress, and some did even better. Pupils identified as having moderate learning difficulties were more likely to make rapid gains, showing that these most-able pupils in the school are well catered for.  Leaders carefully analyse the performance of groups of pupils such as those from different cultural backgrounds and those who are eligible for pupil premium funding. Their analysis is correct in identifying that there

p.3

Inspection findings

are no significant differences in the performance of these groups.  Leaders work effectively with families to make sure that pupils attend school as often as they can. Any absence from school is followed up swiftly. Strategies that are tailored to families’ particular circumstances are put in place to support them. For example, pupils with complex health needs who may need to sleep following seizures are able to arrive later in school when necessary, rather than taking a day’s absence. On the other hand, leaders send text messages to parents whose children travel independently but are regularly late to make sure that parents know exactly what time their child arrives in school. In 2016, there was no significant difference in the attendance of different groups of pupils, including those eligible for support from the pupil premium funding and those who are not.  Teachers and other adults use a range of effective strategies to develop

p.3

Inspection findings

pupils’ reading and pre-reading skills. These include the use of visual symbols and objects of reference. Pupils learn to recognise what these familiar items or symbols represent, before moving on to decode text.  Pupils are taught to communicate effectively with adults and each other using a range of systems and resources. These include the use of technology, signing, symbol exchange and verbal language. However, at times adults do not apply these systems consistently. This reduces pupils’ ability to make their needs known or to understand what is required of them.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that outcomes improve further, by:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 embedding the new middle leadership structure so that it is highly effective in driving forward improvements in teaching, learning and assessment for the specific cohorts of pupils they serve  implementing the existing communication systems consistently and with greater precision, extending pupils’ ability to express their needs and further developing their understanding.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the acting chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Haringey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors agreed to prioritise the following areas with the school at the start of the inspection: the strength and accuracy of the school’s systems for measuring pupils’ progress; whether groups of pupils make strong progress over time; the effectiveness of leaders’ actions to reduce persistent absence, particularly for those eligible for pupil premium funding; the effectiveness of leaders’ actions to address the areas for development identified at the last inspection; and the impact of the revised middle leadership structure.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors carried out activities to explore these areas during the inspection. Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders, a group of staff, three governors and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors made visits to lessons to observe teaching and learning. Some of these visits were carried out jointly with senior leaders. Inspectors looked at assessment information relating to different groups of pupils. A wide range of documentation was scrutinised, including that relating to safeguarding, records of pupils’ absence, leaders’ self-evaluation of the school’s performance and pupils’ work.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion