Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

London Vesta College Limited

Inspected 27 Oct 2016 · URN 59157

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nick Gadfield (lead), Roger Pilgrim

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Oct 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Nick Gadfield, Roger Pilgrim

  • Name on report verified

    London Vesta College Limited

  • URN verified

    59157

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivevery highsupportivehigh-qualityhighly skilledconfidentlyvery well
Criticismconcernsbreachesrequires improvementtoo slowlacksdisruptionlimitedslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings1243w+47
  • Leadership310w+82
  • Safeguarding286w+31
  • What needs to improve104w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,892
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 49%Leadership 12%Safeguarding 11%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

London Vesta College Limited Independent learning provider

p.1

Overall effectiveness Good Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Apprenticeships Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Leaders have taken effective improvement action following the recommendations at the previous inspection.  The proportion of apprentices who achieve their qualifications within the planned time and progress into sustained employment or higher education is very high.  Teachers develop apprentices’ specialist information technology (IT) skills well through effective off-the-job training.  Apprentices develop very good technical and oral communication skills that enable them to deal effectively with customers and contribute well to their employers’ business.  Staff ensure that the supportive and well- chosen employers are closely involved in the apprenticeships.  High-quality support and monitoring of apprentices’ progress ensure that they achieve and develop valued wider employability skills.  Leaders are strongly committed to raising apprentices’ awareness of fundamental British values from the start of the programme.

p.1

Information about the provider

 London Vesta College is a small work-based training provider located in Whitechapel, East London. The college offers advanced and higher-level apprenticeships to employers in the IT and telecommunications sector. Currently, seven apprentices are undertaking IT and telecommunications apprenticeships.  The proportion of school-leavers in East London who achieve five or more GCSEs at grades A* to C is lower than the national average. Unemployment in East London is higher than the national and London average.

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Improve apprentices’ written communication skills so that they match their good oral communication skills and prepare them more effectively for progression to more senior roles at work or to more demanding courses in higher education, where such skills will be needed.  Ensure that lesson observations include enough specific detail to support judgements about the progress apprentices are making and the skills or knowledge they are able to demonstrate.  Ensure that apprentices’ understanding of the dangers of radicalisation and extremism is continually reinforced in lessons, assessment and progress reviews, so that they can confidently apply their knowledge to their role at work.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Leaders have successfully maintained the strengths identified in the previous inspection. They continue to match apprentices and employers effectively, providing high-quality challenging training in a much-needed occupational sector. They ensure that apprentices develop good employability skills, such as how to establish and meet customers’ needs, as well as achieve their qualifications.  Provider staff have effectively implemented most of the recommended improvements since the previous inspection. In particular, the workplace development plan now ensures that the regular and frequent off-the-job training that apprentices receive is carefully linked to their job role and the training they receive at work.  Leaders have developed a very supportive network of potential employers willing and able to offer apprenticeships in a wide variety of demanding IT specialisms. They monitor very closely the destinations of apprentices, many of whom are promoted on completion of

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

their qualification.  Leaders manage the performance of teaching staff and assessors effectively. Records of lesson observations demonstrate improvements in the evidence observers use to support their evaluations. They provide support and guidance to those whose work does not meet the expected standard. Where this does not produce the necessary improvement, leaders move swiftly to remove staff and find replacements. The most recent lesson observations evaluate learning and progress over time, but do not include enough specific detail to support the judgements or facilitate their moderation.  Self-assessment is inclusive and focuses appropriately on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. The accompanying quality-improvement plan provides a useful commentary on the actions taken to deal with the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection and the timescales for completion.

p.3

The governance of the provider

 A non-executive director provides informed external governance and oversight in regular meetings to support the executive directors. He uses his experience of vocational training well to challenge leaders to bring about the clear improvements evident since the previous inspection.

p.3

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Safeguarding policies and procedures have been effectively revised to incorporate the requirements under the ‘Prevent’ duty. The accompanying risk assessment evaluates the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism well and is regularly updated. Staff understand very well that sudden or unexplained changes in an apprentice’s behaviour can be an important indicator of potential safeguarding concerns. Recruitment checks for staff working directly with the apprentices meet requirements.  Safeguarding is introduced to apprentices during induction and reinforced regularly in reviews. As a result, they know how to keep themselves safe, including online, and know how to raise any concerns that they may have. They risk-assess the jobs assigned to them and know of the potential dangers of lone working. One apprentice had the confidence to insist that a piece of equipment in a dentist’s surgery should be repaired at

p.3

Safeguarding

the employer’s base rather than in the surgery because of a potential health and safety hazard. In a few cases, apprentices are not able to recall details about the training received on dealing with the dangers of radicalisation or extremism.  Leaders are passionate advocates for making apprentices aware of the importance of fundamental British values and the impact they have on their lives and workplace. Staff place a significant emphasis on ensuring that apprentices develop a sound understanding of these values. They have completed online safeguarding training covering radicalisation and extremism, supplemented by face-to-face training with staff in a linked further education college. They are provided with helpful guidance on how to introduce these values into lessons but there are no relevant displays in teaching rooms that teachers could use to introduce discussions with apprentices or reinforce their understanding

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Teachers ensure that the classroom-based technical training integrates particularly well with the skills development employers provide in the good-quality workplaces and meets well the principles and requirements of the apprenticeship. Apprentices undertake a variety of demanding IT tasks at work, through which they can apply their technical skills, as well as developing skills in teamwork and communicating with customers.  Teachers are skilful in explaining and developing apprentices’ understanding of topics such as how to assess the security risks to an IT system and how to prevent security breaches. Apprentices respond well to activities that require them to work in small groups and design solutions to IT problems. Teachers make good use of electronic resources to develop apprentices’ independent learning skills and to provide learning opportunities outside of the classroom.  Teachers thoroughly assess and track apprentices’ performance frequently and

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

accurately. Managers analyse the rate of apprentices’ progress through their qualification in order to intervene and arrange additional support where this is judged to be too slow. One apprentice is struggling to achieve the required standards and is making very slow progress. Staff are putting support plans in place, but the significant amount of outstanding work suggests that achieving within the planned time will be challenging.  Teachers provide good-quality feedback that is supportive and clearly indicates to apprentices what they need to do to improve submitted work. Teachers make good use of challenging questioning in lessons to assess apprentices’ recall of previous learning. In a few instances, enthusiastic apprentices are allowed to dominate the responses at the expense of those who are less assertive.  Employers value the contribution that apprentices are making and they are key partners

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

in the apprenticeship programme. They help choose the optional units that best meet the needs of the company and provide good opportunity for the apprentices’ skills development. Employers are kept well informed about the progress their apprentices are making. They are fully involved in the regular reviews of apprentices’ progress, where they provide valuable feedback on the skills apprentices have developed at work.  Teachers are successful in helping apprentices to improve their mathematics and English skills. They help apprentices to develop a good technical vocabulary but they do not routinely correct the few English errors that apprentices make within their written assignments.  Teachers provide apprentices with good pastoral and academic support to help them to complete their programmes. In case of any difficulty, a member of staff is available 24 hours a day. Staff provide good advice and guidance which help potential apprentices to

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

select and apply for appropriate jobs through which they can further develop their skills and meet their career aspirations. The induction to the apprentices’ programmes gives them a good understanding of the requirements and demands of the qualification, as well as employers’ expectations.  Apprentices from diverse backgrounds work well together and teachers ensure that apprentices develop a good understanding of the importance of dealing with their very varied range of customers sensitively, particularly with those who may have little IT knowledge or confidence.

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

 Apprentices are confident, articulate and enjoy their apprenticeship. Their attendance and punctuality are good. The high standard of apprentices’ work, coupled with their attitude and professional approach to their job role, meets the needs of their employers well. They work well together when they attend training sessions in the provider’s centre.  Apprentices on software development apprenticeships write code confidently in a range of programming languages that meet the business needs of their employers. Apprentices on hardware apprenticeships install and support computer networks and enhance the security of IT systems. One apprentice has written code used by the company of a family member to select relevant data, so that a large system can now be used much more efficiently than was previously possible. A task that used to take many hours can now be completed in minutes.  Apprentices communicate well with customers and explain technical details clearly. They

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

participate well in classroom discussions and scrutinise their peers’ answers to technical tasks well. Apprentices’ written English skills meet the requirements of their current job roles but, in a few cases, the quality of their written English lacks the level and precision required for their further professional development.  Managers analyse attendance records at the training centre and take effective action where individual apprentices are absent or late without reason. They involve employers and parents, where appropriate, in discussions and action plans for improvement. They do not routinely analyse reasons that apprentices give when they are late or absent to look for possible patterns or underlying external causes that might affect more than one apprentice, such as transport disruption.  Apprentices have a clear understanding of the value of the apprenticeship, the progression routes available and how their careers may develop. They are able to make

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

informed choices about applying for promotions when they achieve and they benefit from support from teachers and assessors to prepare for interviews, even after they have completed their apprenticeship.

p.6

Outcomes for learners Good

 Apprentices’ achievement of their qualification and subsequent progression at work or into further studies is very high. All apprentices who left in 2015/16 achieved their qualification within the planned time. Almost all apprentices who left in the previous year gained promotion or progressed to higher education. Just under half of the completed apprentices subsequently enrolled on a higher apprenticeship.  The qualifications that apprentices achieve and the skills and standards of work they produce meet national priorities for developing a highly skilled digital workforce. Employers readily acknowledge the value to their business of the skills that apprentices develop at work and through the training sessions in the centre.  Apprentices demonstrate good knowledge and confidence in discussing tasks and challenging their peers to explain complex topics. Most of the current apprentices make good progress and are on track to complete their qualification within the planned time.

p.6

Outcomes for learners Good

 Just over half of the apprentices pass all their required functional skills tests at the first attempt. Managers analyse well the reasons why the others do not and provide effective support for individual apprentices to prepare them more carefully for their next attempt. The remaining apprentices pass their tests at the second attempt.  The numbers of apprentices from individual minority ethnic heritage groups are very small. Nevertheless, managers monitor their achievements closely to ensure that no group is disadvantaged and there are no noticeable gaps.

p.6

Provider details

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.7

Provider details

Approximate number of all learners over the previous full contract year Principal/CEO Dr Nathan Vela

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Main course or learning programme level Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 or above Total number of learners (excluding apprenticeships) 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Number of apprentices by apprenticeship level and age Intermediate Advanced Higher

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 4 1 2 Number of traineeships 16–19 19+ Total

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Number of learners for which the provider receives high- needs funding Funding received from: Skills Funding Agency

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

At the time of inspection, the provider contracts with the following main subcontractors: N/A

p.7

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the head of education and training as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider's most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider.

p.8

Inspection team

Nick Gadfield, lead inspector Her Majesty's Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Roger Pilgrim Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees' college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion