Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Delarue Crickets Pre- School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Lynda Wellard & Caron Pritchard Partnership
- Group reference verified
RP524309
- Inspection date verified
19 Oct 2016
- Inspectors verified
Elizabeth Mackey
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TN10 3TD
- Name on report verified
Delarue Crickets Pre- School
- URN verified
EY493136
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action p.2
- Systems to measure children's progress are not well used by some staff. p.4
- This means that some identified next steps for children’s learning are not precise. p.4
- Staff are confident in their teaching skills and children with additional needs are very well supported to ensure they are fully included in all planned activities. p.4
- Staff effectively promote children’s language development. p.4
- For example, they regularly use familiar songs and gestures within the routine, such as when tidying up. p.4
- This particularly helps children who need more support with communication skills. p.4
- Activities and materials for expressive arts and design are limited. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development6
“Recruitment practices are not robust.” p.4Safeguarding5
“Safeguarding arrangements are not effective.” p.4Communication & language3
“Staff effectively promote children’s language development.” p.4Wellbeing & mental health2
“These help children to settle and become emotionally secure.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 853
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Delarue Crickets Pre- School Poplar Meadow, Welland Road, Tonbridge, Kent, TN10 3TD
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 19 October 2016 Not applicable
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The registered person and leaders do not have sufficient knowledge about safe recruitment procedures. Consequently, staff suitability has not been determined. This puts children's safety at risk. The manager and some staff do not have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues in order to effectively support children's welfare. This means they may not act promptly enough, or take the relevant action, if they are concerned about a child. There are no effective systems in place for staff supervision to help them improve in their role. This means that children's interests are not fully supported. The new systems in place to monitor children’s progress are not yet fully embedded or effective. Weak self-evaluation arrangements mean that the registered person has not identified the breaches in the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the pre- school’s priority areas for improvement.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
There are not enough experiences or equipment provided to promote children's imaginative play. As a result, children do not have opportunities to express themselves, particularly through art, technology and role play.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff interact positively with the children. They know them well and provide support that is tailored to their needs. This helps children to settle and feel secure. Staff promote children's good behaviour well. As a result, older children are learning to play co-operatively and take account of one another's ideas.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:
p.2
Due Date
improve their knowledge and understanding of safer recruitment procedures, with particular regard to the requirement to carry out a disclosure and barring service check (DBS) for all staff and the systems for checking disqualification requirements and ongoing staff suitability 04/11/2016
p.2
Due Date
demonstrate that all staff working on the premises are suitable 04/11/2016 ensure the designated safeguarding lead for the setting has a suitable understanding of the governments statutory guidance, ‘Working Together to Safeguard children 2015’ and understands the role of the Local Authority Designated Officer 04/11/2016
p.2
Due Date
put in place appropriate arrangements for the supervision of staff who have contact with children and families. 04/11/2016
p.2
Due Date
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
implement robust systems for self-evaluation in order to identify priority areas for ongoing improvement and enhance the outcomes for children 11/11/2016
p.2
Due Date
improve staff's knowledge and understanding of systems to assess children's progress in order to ensure that appropriate next steps in children's learning are identified. 11/10/2016
p.2
Due Date
extend the range of experiences for children to express themselves through art, technology and role play. 11/11/2016
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector talked to staff and children at appropriate times throughout the inspection. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager to evaluate the quality of teaching. The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken to on the day of the inspection. The inspector held meetings with senior leaders to discuss the leadership arrangements of the setting. The inspector looked at relevant documentation, including planning and assessment records, policies and procedures and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. The inspector observed teaching and children's learning.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding arrangements are not effective. Recruitment practices are not robust. The registered provider and leadership team do not have a sufficient understanding of the requirements for checking staff suitability. They have failed to carry out a disclosure and barring service check for staff. Furthermore they do not check ongoing staff suitability with regard to disqualification requirements. Staff undertake some training, but they do not receive effective supervision to fully support them in their role. The registered provider does not review the impact of this on staff practice. For example, the registered provider had not identified the manager’s lack of safeguarding knowledge. Senior leaders do not check to see if there are any differences in how groups of children, such as those with English as an additional language, are progressing. Consequently, staff may miss opportunities to identify where additional support is required for this group.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching is variable. Systems to measure children's progress are not well used by some staff. This means that some identified next steps for children’s learning are not precise. Staff are confident in their teaching skills and children with additional needs are very well supported to ensure they are fully included in all planned activities. Staff effectively promote children’s language development. For example, they regularly use familiar songs and gestures within the routine, such as when tidying up. This particularly helps children who need more support with communication skills. Activities and materials for expressive arts and design are limited. They do not give children good enough opportunities to express themselves through design, technology and role play.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children's safety is compromised because of the provider’s failure to ensure staff are suitable. Staff have positive relationships with children. These help children to settle and become emotionally secure. Parents welcome the daily feedback from their child’s key person. Children enjoy a varied menu of freshly prepared nutritious snacks, in line with their dietary needs. They behave well and are responsive to the boundaries in place for their well-being.
p.4
Outcomes for children require improvement
As teaching is not yet consistently good children do not make the best possible progress. They are confident and familiar with the routines in place. Older children are able to work as part of a group and take account of each other’s ideas. For example, they work together to successfully build a large track, without adult assistance. Children enthusiastically help with tasks such as serving snack. This gives them a sense of responsibility and helps to prepare them for school.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY493136 Local authority Kent Inspection number 1075456 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 12 - 21 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 33 Name of registered person Lynda Wellard & Caron Pritchard Partnership
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection Not applicable Telephone number 07496 288372
p.5
reference number
Delarue Crickets Pre-School registered in 2015. It is managed by a partnership and located in Tonbridge, Kent. It is registered on the Early Years Register. There are seven members of staff working with the children. Six staff have appropriate early years qualifications, which includes one member of staff with qualified teacher status. The pre-school receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The pre-school opens during term time only, Monday to Friday from 9.15 am to 3pm.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion