Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 12 Oct 2016 · published 11 Nov 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Oct 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Postcode verified

    WF8 2DD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 63% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh expectationsswiftlyeffectivefeel safepositiveimprovingclearsafe
Criticismpoorconcernnot yetslowabsencenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings744w−8
  • What needs to improve285w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,026
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 28%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs L Quinn Acting Headteacher High Well School Rook Hill Road Pontefract West Yorkshire WF8 2DD

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to High Well School

Following my visit to your school on 11–12 October 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to High Well School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to High Well School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to High Well School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to High Well School

 strengthen work to improve attendance by ensuring that pupils’ targets are reviewed more swiftly, and strategies implemented quickly to ensure that pupils sustain and increasingly meet high expectations  make sure that governors have the information they need to hold leaders accountable for the school’s work and to inform the evaluation and impact of school policies and plans  swiftly implement an external review of governance in order to develop this aspect of leadership and management.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you and the executive headteacher, pupils, the chair of governors and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The visit focused on the actions taken to improve behaviour and attendance. The school’s policies, planning, monitoring and evaluation data and information relating to pupils’ safety and well-being were evaluated. Visits to lessons and a tour of the school were also undertaken.

p.2

Main findings

The general picture of attendance is improving, especially from pupils’ starting points on entry to the school, and particularly for Years 7, 8 and 11. However, across the school, particularly in Years 9 and 10, a significant number of pupils have frequent absences. Current monitoring and reporting to governors about attendance mask the fact that, for many pupils, improvements in their attendance are not sustained over a term and they slip back. This does not enable leaders and governors to make decisions and prioritise actions to tackle this issue. Absence rates remain well above national levels and this remains the biggest barrier to pupils’ learning and achievement.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils are responding to the changes you have introduced to increase the time for literacy and numeracy and to expand the range of subjects and examination options. Pupils say lessons are more interesting and their books and displays of their work demonstrate that they are becoming more engaged in learning. Some pupils are demonstrating pride in their work and are responding to the feedback they receive from teachers.

p.2

Main findings

You have strengthened policy and practice around the way behaviour is managed in the school. Behaviour around the school is calm, particularly on arrival, and also at break and lunchtime. Relationships between staff and pupils are constructive and trusting. Pupils feel safe and many confide in staff and discuss things that concern them. Teachers and other adults are drawing upon their recent training to ensure greater consistency in the way they speak to pupils. Staff are making better use of strategies to calm pupils and prevent situations from getting out of hand. Pupils are motivated by the rewards system, but are less clear about their responsibilities in relation to the school’s sanctions, and many flout the rules to not use derogatory language.

p.2

Main findings

Incidents of poor behaviour are reducing and pupils are making positive choices to stay in classrooms. School policy is much clearer regarding the use of internal seclusion and the ‘chill-out’ rooms, with the latter now only used when a pupil is in crisis. However, the frequency of physical restraint is increasing, especially for a small number of pupils with severe behaviour and mental health needs who have to be restrained several times before alternatives are considered. Your decision to increase the number of therapies and external support from health professionals, as well as better direction of this work, is helping individual pupils to manage their emotions. However, it is clear from discussions that you have identified that the scale of this work is not yet meeting the demands for it. Actions to expand this aspect of provision in order to develop pupils’ resilience and capacity to self-manage

p.2

Main findings

their emotions are not detailed in the school’s plans.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders and governors ensure that pupils are safe. Recruitment practices and child protection arrangements meet requirements.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders’ reports to governors, especially around attendance and behaviour, do not provide them with the level of information they need to check that school plans, policies and procedures are having the desired impact. Governors have been slow to hold leaders to account for this deficit. The chair of governors is keen to develop a more strategic approach to governors’ work and is determined to bring this about.

p.3

Main findings

The school is not complying with regulations for what they should publish about pupil premium funding, information about provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, key stage 4 pupils’ results and information about governors. Consequently, it is not easy for parents to access this basic information about the school.

p.3

External support

The local area is providing useful support for pupils’ health, well-being and social care. School leaders are increasingly coordinating these services to ensure that pupils with complex needs are better supported and make progress in their learning. Informal links with special schools and training are being used well to drive improvements to teaching and the curriculum. Additional support in the form of an external review of governance is advised. It is recommended that this is done swiftly, in order to strengthen accountability and school evaluation, so that the school moves forward securely on its journey to good.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Wakefield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion