Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Hazles Farm
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Hazles Farm Child Care Limited
- Group reference verified
RP911217
- Inspection date verified
17 Oct 2016
- Inspectors verified
Susan King
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SY4 4HE
- Name on report verified
Hazles Farm
- URN verified
508021
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The planning for teaching does not take enough account of what children know, understand and can do. p.1
- Consequently, teaching does not precisely target what children need to learn next. p.1
- Although managers regularly observe practitioners teaching, their observations do not accurately measure the quality of the teaching taking place. p.1
- As a result, practitioners are not helped sufficiently to improve. p.1
- Practitioners do not promote children's early reading and writing skills effectively enough. p.1
- Plans to improve the provision are not clear enough to raise quality to a higher level. p.1
- Managers and practitioners attend all mandatory training and welcome advice and support. p.1
- Risk assessment is robust and effective. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment9
“Risk assessment is robust and effective.” p.1Staff development4
“Child protection training is effective.” p.3Health & safety3
“Risk assessment is robust and effective.” p.1Safeguarding2
“Arrangements for safeguarding are effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 798
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Hazles Farm Hazles Farm, Hazels Road, Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY4 4HE
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 17 October 2016 12 May 2014
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The planning for teaching does not take enough account of what children know, understand and can do. Consequently, teaching does not precisely target what children need to learn next. Although managers regularly observe practitioners teaching, their observations do not accurately measure the quality of the teaching taking place. As a result, practitioners are not helped sufficiently to improve. Practitioners do not promote children's early reading and writing skills effectively enough. Plans to improve the provision are not clear enough to raise quality to a higher level.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Managers and practitioners attend all mandatory training and welcome advice and support. Risk assessment is robust and effective. Practitioners make careful checks of space and equipment before children play. Managers check the records of children's accidents and injuries to identify potential hazards. They take action to minimise risks to children's health and safety. The busy out-of-school club is well organised. Children arrive after school ready to talk and play. Information is shared effectively between parents, schools and the club. This helps to promote children's safety and well-being. Children play happily in the well-equipped nursery. Practitioners make regular observations of children's learning and they know children well. Parents comment that they feel well informed about children's achievements.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that planning takes full account of what children need to learn next, so that they are well supported to make the next steps in their learning 06/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the effectiveness of the monitoring of teaching and ensure that practitioners receive the support and guidance they need to raise standards. 06/01/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
increase staff knowledge and skills in relation to promoting children's early literacy more effectively evaluate the provision more thoroughly, in order to identify weaknesses and plan actions that drive rapid improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and she assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector held a meeting with the provider, nursery manager and deputy manager. She looked at relevant documentation, such as the nursery's self-evaluation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. The inspector completed two joint observations with the deputy manager. The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Manager's assessments of the quality of teaching are not accurate enough. Consequently, practitioners do not receive the training and support they need to continuously raise the standard of their teaching. Although managers and practitioners demonstrate a commitment to promoting children's progress, this is not yet fully effective. Managers have not established a robust approach to identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the provision. They do not set out meaningful and measurable targets for improvement. Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Recruitment is well managed and candidates are fully vetted before they start work in the nursery. Child protection training is effective. Practitioners know what they must do if they have concerns that a child is at risk of abuse or neglect. They demonstrate good awareness of the potential risks to children of cameras and mobile phones in the nursery. For example, they challenge visitors who do not adhere
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Managers collate and use information from children's assessment summaries. For example, they identify aspects of the areas of learning, that room teams must plan activities for. However, practitioner's ongoing assessments of individual children's progress are not used effectively. As a result, activities do not challenge children enough and they do not make good progress. Practitioners demonstrate a limited understanding of how children learn to read and write. A few children lack the confidence to experiment with writing as they do not have enough opportunities to write in a variety of situations. Practitioners do not effectively use planned opportunities to teach children to link written letters to sounds. A number of practitioners, skilfully question children during spontaneous activities, giving them time to think and respond.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Relationships between parents, practitioners and children in the nursery are good. Practitioners are friendly and attentive role models who promote children's positive behaviour. For example, when two children want the same toy, practitioners help them to think about how they can take turns and share fairly. This helps children to develop self control and to respect other people. Children develop strength and agility when they play in the exciting outdoor area and the indoor gym. They follow rules that keep them safe. For example, they know that they must not jump from the steps into the ball pool. Babies have time, space and encouragement to explore. They eagerly try to stand up to play with the interesting toys in the water tray.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Not all children are making good enough progress from their starting points. However, most children are developing the basic skills they need for school. Children know and can follow nursery routines. They listen to stories. Children count during daily activities and know some of the purposes that numbers can be used for. Children can serve their own food with support and know how to make healthy choices in their diet.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 508021 Local authority Shropshire Inspection number 1075246 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 11 Total number of places 98 Number of children on roll 132 Name of registered person Hazles Farm Child Care Limited
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 12 May 2014 Telephone number 01939 250234
p.4
reference number
Hazles Farm was registered in 1999. The nursery employs 17 members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 6 and nine at level 3. One member of staff holds qualified teacher status. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday and all year round. Sessions are from 7am until 7pm. The nursery also operates out-of- school provision. Sessions are from 7am until 9am and 3pm until 6pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion