Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 12 Oct 2016 · published 8 Nov 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jonathan Keay

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Oct 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jonathan Keay

  • Postcode verified

    B8 2LQ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedstronghigh expectationsoutstandingclearwell-plannedeffectivesuccessfully
Criticismnot yetnot alwaysinconsistenciesfalling behindnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,428
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Sue Simmons Headteacher Thornton Primary School Thornton Road Ward End Birmingham West Midlands B8 2LQ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 12 October 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 make sure new staff continue to have the training and support required to help them improve and embed their practice  ensure that teachers have the same high expectations of learning across the curriculum as those found in English and mathematics  provide governors that are new to post with further training to help them offer a greater level of challenge and support.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Joint observations with leaders were conducted in every year group. I scrutinised a range of documents including plans for staff training, pupil assessment information and the school’s self-evaluation. I analysed the monitoring programme that leaders use to check on improvements at Thornton Primary. I also reviewed the school’s single central record and the contents of some personnel files.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection, there have been a number of changes in staffing. Several teachers left the school in July 2016. Eight newly qualified teachers joined the school in September 2016. The school’s deputy headteacher is temporarily supporting the leadership of another local school. Governors have appointed two new assistant headteachers to oversee the early years foundation stage and the development of the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

At the last inspection, leaders and governors were asked to develop a number of areas. These areas are set out in detail in the school development plan and are reviewed termly to monitor the extent to which milestones are being met. Improvement plans are suitably adapted, following evaluations by leaders and governors. As a result of careful planning and evaluation, leaders have improved the overall quality of teaching and learning. As headteacher, you continue to provide clear direction and strong leadership.

p.2

Main findings

You have utilised funding and reduced the surplus budget to make improvements to the front of the school and several meeting areas. These improvements have enhanced security and provide professional and comfortable spaces for leaders to meet with families and other agencies. Plans are in place to further improve the library and corridors in the forthcoming months.

p.2

Main findings

The development of teaching, learning and assessment has been central to your improvement plans. A well-planned programme of staff training has ensured that teachers and teaching assistants pay closer attention to the work they set for pupils. Work in pupils’ books evidences a strong level of challenge in English and mathematics. Teachers check the work of pupils carefully and provide feedback that helps pupils to extend their learning and work at a greater depth. This higher level of challenge is providing the most able pupils with opportunities to successfully build on what they already know. However, work in subjects across the curriculum, including history and geography, does not always demonstrate the same level of rigour. Senior leaders have identified this in monitoring activities and recognise that further work is required to ensure that expectations and standards are as high as they should be in a wide range of subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Teaching, learning and assessment has improved but there remain some inconsistencies across the school. This is, in part, as a result of the changes to staffing over recent months. Leaders recognise the importance of ensuring that new staff have sufficient time and support to familiarise themselves with your expectations.

p.3

Main findings

Governors and leaders have restructured the school’s leadership team and made a number of key appointments. Your assistant headteachers have begun their work with enthusiasm and drive. They have an accurate view of how the school is developing and understand the performance of different groups of pupils. These leaders have a clear understanding of the strengths and areas for development of the teachers they line manage. As a result of regular visits to class and teaching alongside their colleagues, leaders are contributing to improvements in teaching.

p.3

Main findings

The actions taken by leaders to strengthen provision in the Nursery and Reception classes are having a positive impact. The outdoor area, for example, has been significantly developed to promote a greater level of independence. During the inspection, children were observed exploring new resources and making choices about what they wanted to learn. Children were also able to accurately recall prior learning. Several children spoke to me about the chicks that had visited them earlier in the term. For instance, they described how the chicks had hatched from their eggs and the different colours of their feathers.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have invested in a new assessment system that allows them to closely track the achievement of different groups of children. Information from this new assessment system is being used to devise additional support for any pupils that are falling behind. The assessment system is also used by the school’s feeder infant school. By using the same system, the schools are able to share information quickly and devise planning that closely meets the needs of pupils. Given how new the assessment system is, it is too early to assess the full impact it is having on standards.

p.3

Main findings

Behaviour in the playground has improved. Break and lunchtimes have been staggered to reduce the number of pupils outside at any given time. The key stage 2 playground has been resurfaced and modernised. Areas of the playground are separated by cones so that it is clear to pupils where different activities are allowed to take place. A group of older pupils act as peer mediators and effectively support other pupils in resolving any difficulties. Although leaders have begun to keep records of the frequency of any incidents or accidents, this information is not yet sufficiently analysed to allow leaders to act on findings.

p.3

Main findings

Leaders have further developed the programme of guided reading introduced in September 2015. This has included the purchase of new books for all age groups and advisory support from a literacy specialist. Outcomes in the Year 1 phonics screening check improved in 2016. Standards in reading at the end of key stage 1 were higher than those found nationally. However, rates of progress and attainment in reading have not been strong at the end of key stage 2. The school’s assessment information shows that a higher proportion of children are now on track to reach age-related expectations in reading at the end of key stage 2 in 2017.

p.4

Main findings

Work in pupils’ books shows that there is now an increased emphasis on problem- solving skills in mathematics. In line with school policy, pupils are presented with daily challenges that encourage them to use reasoning skills and work at a greater depth. As a result, pupils are making better rates of progress from their starting points.

p.4

Main findings

The governing body has recruited new members to draw upon a wider range of skills and expertise. The chair of the governing body knows the school well, understands its priorities and the work that is required next to ensure that the school is good at its next inspection. Some governors are new to post and do not yet know enough about the school to be able to fully challenge leaders.

p.4

External support

The school has forged new relationships with a number of local schools. The local authority has specifically worked with the school to broker a close partnership with a local outstanding provider. Expertise is being shared across the schools and additional staff training has been delivered in priority areas such as reading. As a result of these new partnerships, the quality of teaching is improving.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Birmingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion