Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
3 Oct 2016
- Postcode verified
BD10 9AX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The majority of the areas identified for improvement are being successfully tackled and there are coherent plans in place to address the remaining issues, although time will tell how successful these will be. p.2
- She has commissioned the headteacher from the outstanding Bankfoot Primary School to work with senior leaders and this is increasing the efficiency, rigour, urgency and impact of the school’s strategic leadership. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This must continue if they are to reach their potential, especially for those groups such as Year 3 who need to catch up as a result of their prior underachievement. p.3
- The school does not follow the Department for Education guidance on what maintained schools must publish online, notably in relation to the pupil premium. p.3
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- You acknowledge that there needs to be an even greater impact from this investment. p.2
- Until further notice the school should email a termly progress report to me. p.3
- The school should also forward a copy of the pupil premium review it commissioned as it was not made available to HMI during the monitoring inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,256
- longer than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Andrew Gaunt Headteacher Greengates Primary School Stockhill Road Greengates Bradford West Yorkshire BD10 9AX
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 3 October 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.
p.1
School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
increase the impact of strategies to improve disadvantaged pupils’ attainment at key stage 1 and key stage 2, the achievement they make from their starting points and their attendance iron out the remaining inconsistencies in the impact of teaching and leadership on pupils’ learning and progress across year groups and subjects, particularly for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, discussions were held with you and the deputy headteacher, three members of the governing body and a local authority representative. I spoke to pupils, and scrutinised their work. I also examined documentation relating to the actions the school has taken to tackle the areas requiring improvement, attendance, governance, assessment and pupil progress information. I observed teaching and learning in the school’s eight classes, including the Nursery and Reception classes.
p.2
Context
The assistant headteacher, who was also the Year 6 class teacher, left the school in July 2016. A replacement has been appointed but is unable to take up post immediately. Since September 2016 the school has been using supply teachers and the deputy headteacher to cover the current Year 6 class. A new chair of the governing body and two additional governors have been appointed recently.
p.2
Main findings
The efficiency and effectiveness of the school’s leadership and management are improving. This improvement has had a marked effect on the quality of teaching and the breadth of the curriculum. The accuracy of assessment and the rigour of monitoring procedures have also been enhanced. As a result of these developments, the majority of pupils are making faster progress. Staff are being held more accountable for the effectiveness of their work; pupils are being engaged more actively in their learning. In addition, pupils who are at risk of underachieving or falling behind are being identified and supported more quickly. The majority of the areas identified for improvement are being successfully tackled and there are coherent plans in place to address the remaining issues, although time will tell how successful these will be. You are aware that potential threats to the school’s continued improvement include the makeshift arrangements for teaching and
p.2
Main findings
learning in Year 6 and the attainment of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Nevertheless, the school has unequivocally ‘turned the corner’ and is visibly improving.
p.2
Main findings
Observations of teaching and learning, scrutiny of pupils’ work and the school’s performance information indicate that pupils’ learning and progress are accelerating. Expectations of what pupils are capable of are rising. Work is more challenging, particularly in mathematics, and pupils have opportunities to acquire, apply and begin to master knowledge, skills and understanding across a range of subjects. Staff are largely adhering to the school’s marking and feedback policy which is supporting pupils to make better progress. The school has invested heavily in support staff and resources for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. You acknowledge that there needs to be an even greater impact from this investment. You also accept that there remains a degree of inconsistency in the impact of teaching, for example where staff do not ensure pupils fully understand what is expected of them or where pupils are given work that is too easy or too
p.2
Main findings
hard. Similarly, you acknowledge that, on occasion, the assessment of homework could be more robust and meaningful.
p.3
Main findings
The provisional key stage 1 and key stage 2 outcomes in 2016 are favourable overall. For example, the proportion of key stage 2 pupils who met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics was 6% higher than the provisional national average. However, this is counterbalanced by the weaker performance of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. There are significant differences between the proportions of these pupils reaching expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics and the others. The school’s assessment information indicates that, over the past 12 months, the majority of year groups have made accelerated progress towards their respective targets. This must continue if they are to reach their potential, especially for those groups such as Year 3 who need to catch up as a result of their prior underachievement.
p.3
Main findings
There are tangible improvements in the quality and impact of provision in the early years, with more effective teaching ensuring that a higher than average proportion of children reached a good level of development in 2016. There is some evidence that the most able children are being routinely challenged. This was evident in the outdoor area, which has doubled in size since the previous inspection, and now has some good provision for children to acquire, develop and consolidate their mathematical skills. Collectively, this is helping to ensure that more children are ready for the next stage of their learning when they transfer to Year 1.
p.3
Main findings
Pupils’ punctuality and the overall rate of attendance are improving. However, despite your best efforts, the rate of persistent absence has risen over time. You accept that the school needs to become more effective in improving the attendance of a small but hard-to-reach minority of pupils who are skewing your overall figures.
p.3
Main findings
The school does not follow the Department for Education guidance on what maintained schools must publish online, notably in relation to the pupil premium.
p.3
Main findings
Members of the governing body are well qualified to challenge and support the school’s improvement and do so shrewdly. Their loyalty is tempered by a recognition that the journey to becoming a good school is far from complete. The outcomes for some groups remain inhibiting factors. Governors know that, as the appropriate authority, it is incumbent upon them to test out periodically the extent to which parents and carers are being actively engaged in supporting their children’s learning and attendance.
p.3
Main findings
Until further notice the school should email a termly progress report to me. The school should also forward a copy of the pupil premium review it commissioned as it was not made available to HMI during the monitoring inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority is facilitating effective support and challenge which is helping the school to tackle the areas requiring improvement more quickly. The achievement officer linked to the school is robustly monitoring and evaluating the impact of the school’s work and her evaluative feedback and recommendations are frank and insightful. She has commissioned the headteacher from the outstanding Bankfoot Primary School to work with senior leaders and this is increasing the efficiency, rigour, urgency and impact of the school’s strategic leadership.
p.4
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children's services for Bradford. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion