Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Langley Park School for Girls

Inspected 20 Sept 2016 · published 3 Nov 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Sept 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matt Tiplin

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BR3 3BE

  • Name on report verified

    Langley Park School for Girls

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongexcellenteffectiverobustconsistentlyeffectivelyhighly effectivegood progress
Criticismweakerdeclinenot improvednot consistentlynot improving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1214w+78
  • What needs to improve83w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,285
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Dr Anne Hudson Headteacher Langley Park School for Girls Hawksbrook Lane South Eden Park Road Beckenham Kent BR3 3BE

p.1

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

Following my visit to the school on 20 September 2016 with Des Dunne, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in April 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths, which have resulted in pupils making strong progress towards good outcomes. You and your leadership team have not rested on your laurels. You have astutely identified areas of the school’s performance that require further work in order to secure the best possible outcomes across all subjects and year groups. Your plans for further school improvement are straightforward and clearly focused on strategies to achieve that goal.

p.1

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

Since the last inspection, leaders have focused on securing stronger teaching, learning and assessment. Teachers now assess pupils’ progress more consistently and use the information more effectively. Consequently, teachers identify pupils’ needs and plan lessons that allow pupils to make strong progress from their starting points. Supported by a robust system of professional development, teachers are now better placed to get the best out of pupils in most subjects. Middle leaders have played a key part in this drive for consistency, checking that teachers’ expectations are high and that they use questioning incisively to probe pupils’ understanding.

p.1

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

The school works well to support disadvantaged pupils, enabling them to make strong progress and diminishing the difference with their non-disadvantaged peers nationally. The school provides highly effective support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. As a result, their access to the curriculum has improved, and potential barriers to good attendance are being overcome.

p.1

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

Pupils join the school with typically higher than average prior attainment. Leaders recognise this and have strategies in place to secure high outcomes for the most able pupils. In mathematics, the most able pupils have access to accelerated courses and further mathematics at A level in the sixth form, enabling them to build on their excellent GCSE results. Like their peers, the most able pupils are also fluent readers and are provided with additional enrichment opportunities to develop the skills needed to be highly successful in modern Britain.

p.2

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

The sixth form is improving, having been identified by leaders as an area for further development after a recent decline in progress and outcomes. Leaders have taken action to improve the curriculum offer and amend entry requirements to some courses. Consequently, students now access more suitable 16 to 19 study programmes. Students made better progress last academic year, but leaders recognise that outcomes are not all improving quickly across weaker subjects, such as sociology and physics.

p.2

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

Leaders and governors have ensured that robust systems are in place to support pupils’ welfare and minimise risks to their safety. Last year’s review of safeguarding further enhanced the school’s safeguarding procedures. Governors’ development has included training on counter-radicalisation, helping them and the school to fulfil the ‘Prevent’ duty effectively. Leaders are very aware of local contextual issues relating to pupils’ well-being and they work closely with external agencies and the police to keep pupils safe within their community. The school’s documentation and policies are up to date, taking into account the latest statutory guidance. The school community’s uncompromising attitude towards pupils’ welfare is woven throughout its work. For example, pupils led work that qualified the school to receive Unicef’s ‘Recognition of Achievement’ for the Rights Respecting Schools programme. This reflects the school’s commitment to developing pupils’ knowledge and

p.2

Short inspection of Langley Park School for Girls

understanding of global issues that have local consequences.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Historically, results have been very strong, with pupils overall making excellent progress towards good outcomes in GCSE examinations. Current pupils’ work and the school’s analysis of last year’s outcomes indicate that this trend is set to continue.  There is a culture of reading in the school that underpins pupils’ improving progress. Pupils are given time in tutorial sessions to read freely and the library is well used at social times. Pupils who require support to catch up with their peers do so quickly because of closely monitored and effective programmes to improve their reading.  Pupil premium funding is used effectively to support disadvantaged pupils’ making good progress. Pupils told inspectors about the effective support that they receive from teachers. Their work reflects the school’s commitment to ensuring that disadvantaged pupils make progress as good as that of other pupils nationally.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The difference in progress between disadvantaged pupils and others nationally has diminished quickly in recent historical results. However, disadvantaged pupils’ attainment has not improved as consistently as shown in the school’s analysis of last year’s GCSE results and assessment information. The most able disadvantaged pupils’ performance is now better and their work in English and mathematics demonstrates good progress towards the highest outcomes.  Pupils’ attendance and behaviour continue to be strong. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils is improving overall. Robust systems are in place to support pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities to access their learning and make good progress towards aspirational targets.  Teachers know their pupils well and pupils recognise the work that teachers do to support them. Where teaching is at its best, teachers maintain pupils’ engagement in learning very well by encouraging pupils

p.3

Inspection findings

to ask questions and discuss their responses. Occasionally, teachers miss opportunities to challenge pupils to make better progress.  Teachers provide useful feedback that pupils use well to improve their learning. Senior and subject leaders monitor the quality of feedback to maintain consistency across subjects and year groups.  Leaders have raised teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve. For example, improvements in science have been particularly effective in improving pupils’ outcomes at GCSE because leaders quickly analyse pupils’ performance and intervene appropriately.  Outcomes in the sixth form are improving, with better progress being made across most subjects. More students who needed to retake English or mathematics at GCSE gained at least a C grade last year. This is leading to a higher proportion of lower-attaining students moving on to higher-level courses, which is enabling them to secure better outcomes.

p.3

Inspection findings

Improvements in outcomes mean that students are better placed for their subsequent education, training and employment. Effective advice and guidance is helping students choose the best courses to help them achieve their goals of university places or apprenticeships.  Sixth form leaders have taken effective steps to improve outcomes in weaker subjects, such as economics, where students do not perform well. Analysis of the school’s AS-level results indicates far stronger progress in 2016 across almost all subjects. As a result, the vast majority of students now continue their studies into Year 13. However, at A level and in some work-related subjects, the rate of improvement has not been as fast. Leaders have plans in place to further improve students’ performance in all subjects by building on a robust system of student support and intervention. It is too soon to see the impact of these plans in all subject

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 disadvantaged pupils’ attainment improves quickly and consistently across year groups, to reflect their strong progress  progress improves rapidly across all subjects in the 16 to 19 study programmes by teachers consistently planning to stretch students from their starting points.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bromley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

The inspectors agreed with school leaders to prioritise the following areas at the start of the inspection: the effectiveness of strategies to improve pupils’ attendance, particularly that of disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities; how the school is supporting disadvantaged pupils, including the most-able disadvantaged pupils, to make better progress; what leaders are doing to improve pupils’ performance in science; and the effectiveness of work done to improve outcomes in 16 to 19 study programmes.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors visited 19 lessons jointly with members of the school’s senior leadership team. Inspectors scrutinised pupils’ work, inside and outside of lessons. They listened to pupils read, including the most able pupils and those receiving support in order to catch up with their peers. Meetings were held with leaders, staff, members of the governing body, including the chair, and with representatives from the multi- academy trust. Inspectors spoke with pupils both formally and informally and observed their behaviour during social times. The inspectors took account of the views expressed by parents by email and through the online survey, Parent View.

p.4

Information about the inspection

The inspectors scrutinised a range of school documentation, including: policy and procedure documents, assessment information, information detailing the school’s analysis and actions with regard to attendance, behaviour and support for vulnerable pupils; the single central register of pre-employment checks on staff; leaders’ evaluation of the school’s performance, and the commissioned external audits into teaching and learning, and safeguarding.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion