Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
New Life Church BedfordshireTrust
- Group reference verified
RP520291
- Inspection date verified
14 Oct 2016
- Inspectors verified
Hayley Marshall-Gowen
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
LU5 5AD
- Name on report verified
Twinkle Pre-School
- URN verified
EY219237
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Assessments of children's learning are inconsistent and sometimes weak. p.1
- Lack of effective monitoring of the pre-school p.1
- has led to weak areas of practice increasing over time. p.1
- Several changes to the management of the pre-school have led to weaknesses not being suitably addressed. p.3
- The weaknesses in assessing children's development have a negative impact upon their progress in their personal, social and emotional development. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- undertake effective supervision for all staff that contributes towards a culture of mutual support and teamwork and enables them to receive coaching to improve their personal effectiveness 19/12/2016 p.2
- improve observations and assessments of children's development, identify what children's initial starting points are and support them to make good ongoing progress 19/12/2016 p.2
- use ongoing observation and assessment to identify children's next steps in learning and to plan challenging opportunities for them relevant to their age and abilities. 19/12/2016 p.2
- use self-evaluation as a tool to help improve and monitor the ongoing quality of the pre-school. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“Assessments of children's learning are inconsistent and sometimes weak.” p.1Safeguarding2
“Arrangements for safeguarding are effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 834
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Twinkle Pre-School New Life Church, 80a Houghton Road, Dunstable, Bedfordshire, LU5 5AD
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 14 October 2016 26 November 2012
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
There have been several changes of manager in quick succession. An uncertainty about the role of the leadership team has led to a lack of supervision over a period of time for various managers. This has resulted in a decline in quality at the pre-school. Staff have not received consistent ongoing support and coaching in their roles. Assessments of children's learning are inconsistent and sometimes weak. Staff do not identify children's starting points in learning. Therefore, they do not have the necessary information to support children to make good progress at the pre-school. Staff do not use the observations that they make to determine children's next steps in learning. This means that they are unable to plan activities that give children suitable levels of challenge and focus on the most important areas of development for young children. Self-evaluation has not been maintained. Lack of effective monitoring of the pre-school
p.1
This provision is inadequate
has led to weak areas of practice increasing over time. As a result, these now have a significant negative impact on the teaching, learning and assessment for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children settle well. Staff are caring and considerate towards children's feelings, especially when they first start at the pre-school. Staff work with parents to help children to feel confident at the pre-school.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
undertake effective supervision for all staff that contributes towards a culture of mutual support and teamwork and enables them to receive coaching to improve their personal effectiveness 19/12/2016
p.2
Due Date
improve observations and assessments of children's development, identify what children's initial starting points are and support them to make good ongoing progress 19/12/2016
p.2
Due Date
use ongoing observation and assessment to identify children's next steps in learning and to plan challenging opportunities for them relevant to their age and abilities. 19/12/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
use self-evaluation as a tool to help improve and monitor the ongoing quality of the pre-school.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager. The inspector held a meeting with the manager. She looked at relevant documentation, such as the self-evaluation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the pre- school. The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents and children during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Several changes to the management of the pre-school have led to weaknesses not being suitably addressed. The committee members who lead the pre-school are not fully aware of their roles in terms of monitoring and supervising the work of managers. Staff supervision meetings have not helped staff to know how to support children's learning. This has resulted in a decline in the quality of the provision. Nevertheless, there is a new manager in place who has a targeted action plan for improvement. The committee members have undertaken some training, such as how to safely recruit new staff members. All staff are motivated and positive about moving the pre-school forward. Despite these considerable efforts, the beneficial impact of these measures is not yet evident in practice. Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The suitability of staff and committee members is checked and risk assessments help staff to maintain a safe
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
environment for children. Staff have undertaken training to keep them up to date with the child protection procedures of the Local Safeguarding Children Board.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Staff do not identify children's starting points at entry to the pre-school. They observe children, but do not readily link these observations to expected levels of development to monitor their progress. As a result, it is not possible to see how well children are developing or to identify if children's development does not meet expectations for their age. Children's next steps in learning are not clear so staff cannot readily support their progress during activities and provide them with sufficient challenge. Staff complete the required check for children between the age of two and three years, but these are not actively used to plan for younger children's learning. However, staff are supportive in their interactions with children. They help children who speak English as additional language to hear and use English as part of their play. Staff provide activities that children enjoy, such as making scarecrows from coloured paper shapes.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in assessing children's development have a negative impact upon their progress in their personal, social and emotional development. Staff do not always focus well on what helps young children to develop. They do not provide a stimulating and challenging environment to help children to be motivated and eager to learn. Despite this, children are settled and develop good relationships with their key person. Staff follow consistent ways to help children to behave well. Children eat healthy snacks and have access to an outdoor area to play in the fresh air.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Staff are not able to identify how well children progress in their learning. Therefore, children are not necessarily gaining the skills that they need in readiness for starting school. It is not evident how well children who have special educational needs or disabilities develop in comparison with their peers. Children's communication and language skills are developing. Children move around the pre-school confidently and play with a range of toys and equipment.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY219237 Local authority Central Bedfordshire Inspection number 1059625 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 18 Name of registered person New Life Church BedfordshireTrust
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 26 November 2012 Telephone number 01582 534567
p.4
reference number
Twinkle Pre-School was registered in 2002. The pre-school employs four members of childcare staff. Of these, all hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The pre- school opens Mondays from 9.30am until 12.30pm, Tuesdays and Thursdays 9.30am until 3.30pm and Friday from 9.30am until midday, during term time only. Children may attend for a variety of sessions. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children. The pre-school supports a number of children who speak English as an additional language, those who have special educational needs or disabilities.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion