Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Fair View Kindergarten

Inspected 10 Oct 2016 · published 2 Nov 2016 · URN 254054

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Julie Meredith-Jenkins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Jane Frances Christine Cooke

  • Group reference verified

    RP511532

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Oct 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Meredith-Jenkins

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NR10 3DG

  • Name on report verified

    Fair View Kindergarten

  • URN verified

    254054

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentlyconfidenteffectivelyaccuratelypositivelyconsistentpolitesafe
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsnot yetweakweaknessesat risknot effectivenot robust

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings49w0
  • What needs to improve866w−38

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
874
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
25%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 60%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Fair View Kindergarten Fairview Farm, 31/33 Corner Lane,Horsford, NORWICH, Norfolk, NR10 3DG

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 10 October 2016 23 October 2012

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Staff do not use their assessments of children to accurately plan targeted experiences and opportunities to support children's next steps in learning. Children are not always best supported to reach to their full potential.  Staff do not always give children the opportunity to identify and manage risks in the environment for themselves.  The management team's arrangements for staff supervision and support are not yet effective in ensuring that all staff consistently achieve good quality teaching.  Routines of the day are not always effectively managed to ensure children experience consistently good quality learning opportunities.  The management team's evaluation of the quality of provision is not yet effective. Where weak areas are identified, they are not addressed promptly to maintain good quality practice.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Staff work closely in partnership with parents. They share ongoing information about children's care and learning. Parents comment positively about the nursery provision.  Children build secure relationships with staff to ensure their emotional needs are met. They happily play alongside staff and other children, and develop good social skills.  Staff are good role models to children. They encourage children to be confident and to value each other. Staff give consistent messages to children to promote good behaviour, and encourage children to be polite and use good manners.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve planning to support children's ongoing development, using information from assessments of their achievements to focus effectively on their individual learning needs and precise next steps. 10/12/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 reinforce children's growing awareness of how to keep themselves safe and involve them in identifying and assessing risks as they explore their environment  strengthen the system for the supervision of staff to help them to become more confident in their roles and abilities, and maintain consistently good quality teaching  support staff in recognising the opportunities that arise from some daily routines to promote children's enthusiasm and motivation for learning more effectively  evaluate the quality of provision more robustly to identify and address any weaknesses in practice at the earliest opportunity.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the nursery manager.  The inspector held a meeting with the nursery manager and the two deputy managers. She looked at relevant documentation, such as the nursery's self-evaluation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery.  The inspector sampled a range of other documentation, including the learning and development records of children, the setting's policies and procedures and risk assessments.  The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

The management team and staff reflect on what they provide and identify some improvements they would like to make to provision. However, this is not robust in order to maintain good quality provision. Where areas to improve are identified, such as in their system of planning, actions taken are not implemented at the earliest opportunity. The management team and staff assess all areas to be used by children for risk. However, they do not involve children in assessing potential risk for themselves, such as when playing on some outdoor play equipment in the rain. Newer members of staff receive appropriate supervision and support. More experienced staff, however, are not fully supported to help them to continue to raise the quality of their teaching. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff have a suitable understanding of the actions they must take if they have concerns about children's welfare or if they have

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

concerns about staff practice which puts a child at risk of harm.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Many of the staff are well qualified and complete regular assessments of children's learning. However, they do not use their knowledge and skills to ensure planning for children is accurately targeted to address any gaps in their learning. Activities do not always challenge children or focus on promoting their next steps in learning. Some staff are not always aware of plans for children's learning. Staff support children to follow their interests in self-chosen play. However, they do not always engage children for prolonged periods or offer them consistent challenge in their learning. Children access a suitable range of resources and staff interact with them as they play. For example, staff help children to find a ball which they use to explore motion as they roll it down a small ramp. Children develop their early speaking skills and repeat vocabulary that the staff model. Children play imaginatively in the role play area as they pretend to cook and eat.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

Staff complete daily checks of the environment to make sure it is safe for children. However, they do not always use opportunities to encourage children to identify and manage risks for themselves. For example, they do not teach children how to reassess risk when using play equipment in wet weather. Some routines of the day for older children are not always well organised or managed. Sometimes, children become restless and lose focus as they wait for prolonged periods without being appropriately stimulated to learn. Children are encouraged to be independent in self-care and learn to adopt healthy lifestyles. They are provided with healthy food and drink and access regular physical outdoor play. Staff praise children often to support their confidence and self-esteem.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Not all children make good enough progress from their starting points. Children do not always engage in activities for sustained periods and do not consistently demonstrate high levels of concentration. Children demonstrate some listening skills and generally respond well to adults' instructions. Children acquire basic skills to prepare them for the next stage in their learning, such as school.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 254054 Local authority Norfolk Inspection number 1059475 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 11 Total number of places 57 Number of children on roll 136 Name of registered person Jane Frances Christine Cooke

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 23 October 2012 Telephone number 01603 898237

p.4

reference number

Fair View Kindergarten was registered in 1994. The nursery employs 21 members of childcare staff. Of these, 17 hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday all year round. Sessions are from 6.45am until 6pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion