Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder, Out-of school day care in Peterborough
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Oct 2016
- Inspectors verified
Susan Sykes
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY444299
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder's observations of the children are not used effectively to precisely identify the next steps in their learning and plan activities to support their development. p.1
- Monitoring of children's progress is irregular and does not accurately identify any gaps in learning so these can be swiftly addressed. p.1
- The childminder does not always gather enough information from parents about children's learning and achievements at home. p.1
- This means she cannot use parents' knowledge to complement her teaching and promote children's rapid progress. p.1
- The childminder has not implemented a rigorous self-evaluation process to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the provision. p.1
- They develop strong, affectionate bonds with the childminder and her assistant, who are kind and responsive to their needs. p.1
- The childminder and her assistant promote children's speech and communication skills well. p.1
- This supports children to be confident communicators. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language4
“The childminder and her assistant promote children's speech and communication skills well.” p.1Wellbeing & mental health2
“They share information about children's learning and development as well as children's well-being.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 760
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 5 October 2016 12 November 2012
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The childminder's observations of the children are not used effectively to precisely identify the next steps in their learning and plan activities to support their development. Monitoring of children's progress is irregular and does not accurately identify any gaps in learning so these can be swiftly addressed. The childminder does not always gather enough information from parents about children's learning and achievements at home. This means she cannot use parents' knowledge to complement her teaching and promote children's rapid progress. The childminder has not implemented a rigorous self-evaluation process to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the provision.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are self-assured and happy. They develop strong, affectionate bonds with the childminder and her assistant, who are kind and responsive to their needs. The childminder and her assistant promote children's speech and communication skills well. This supports children to be confident communicators. The childminder works closely with local schools and other settings. They share information about children's learning and development as well as children's well-being. Children learn about their local community and the wider world through outings and carefully planned experiences and activities.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
develop the use of observations of children's learning to plan activities and identify next steps that further support their progress 28/10/2016
p.2
Due Date
complete rigorous assessments of children's progress, including an initial assessment based on children's starting points so that any gaps in learning can be quickly identified and addressed. 28/10/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
gather more information from parents about children's learning and achievements at home and use this to complement teaching in the setting strengthen the self-evaluation processes to ensure that areas for development are accurately identified and addressed, including the views of children and parents.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector viewed the areas used for childminding. She talked to the children and childminder at appropriate times throughout the inspection and observed a variety of activities. The inspector looked at evidence of the suitability and qualifications of the childminder as well as a selection of policies and procedures, including safeguarding. She discussed risk assessments and the childminder's self-evaluation process. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the childminder. She discussed children's learning and development and sampled their records and looked at the planning documentation. The inspector took account of the views of parents by reading a number of their comments on letters obtained by the childminder.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The childminder and her assistant understand the procedures to follow should they have a concern about a child in their care. The home is effectively risk assessed to ensure that children play and explore in a safe and secure environment. The childminder has policies and procedures in place which underpin her practice. The childminder works very well with her assistant. She keeps the assistant up to date with changes to practice and supports her professional development. Feedback from parents shows the high regard they hold for the childminder. However, the childminder's evaluation of her practice does not effectively identify the weaknesses in her practice so that action can be taken to improve.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder observes children's learning and development. However, these observations and the monitoring of children's progress are not used effectively to plan children's next steps or identify gaps in their learning. This means that the childminder does not know precisely where children are in their learning or is able to identify any gaps to support their continuing progress. The childminder gains some informal information from parents about their child's progress at home. However, this does not give a sufficient overview of what children know and can do in order to inform more-effective planning. The childminder and her assistant engage in children's play and during these interactions the quality of teaching is purposeful. For example, children cuddle with the childminder to read stories together. Children are excited and giggle as they point out the characters they know and talk about what they are doing. This helps to support children's communication
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
and language skills. Children's mathematical and problem-solving skills are supported as they build towers from bricks or complete age-appropriate puzzles.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Children are very confident and at ease in the childminder's home. Children enjoy the childminder and her assistant's warm interactions and they receive extensive praise and encouragement. This raises children's self-esteem and supports their willingness to persevere in activities. Children benefit from fresh air and exercise daily. They go on outings in the local area, such as the library or park. These outings also help children to learn about their local community. The childminder helps children learn about other cultures. She takes time to find out about children's backgrounds and involves their families in celebrating their festivals in a meaningful way.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children are making some progress in their learning and development. However, because the childminder does not rigorously monitor children's learning and development, they are not always challenged enough to make the best progress. Despite this, they are sociable, well behaved and show increasing confidence, developing some of the necessary skills in preparation for their next stage of learning.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY444299 Local authority Peterborough Inspection number 1060091 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 12 Number of children on roll 7
p.4
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 12 November 2012
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2010 and lives in Peterborough, Cambridgeshire. She works with an assistant every day. She operates all year round from 7.30am to 6pm, Monday to Thursday, except bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder provides funded early education two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion