Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Ashburton House Day Nursery

Inspected 29 Sept 2016 · published 21 Oct 2016 · URN EY474097

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jennifer Devine

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Nikki's Nurseryies Ltd

  • Group reference verified

    RP533406

  • Inspection date verified

    29 Sept 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Jennifer Devine

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    KT13 8QR

  • Name on report verified

    Monkey Puzzle Weybridge

  • URN verified

    EY474097

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlyrigoroushappywell behavedpositivelypromptlyaccurately
Criticismweaknessesbreachnot good enoughat risknot robustnot consistentlylacknot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings48w0
  • What needs to improve735w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
743
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 59%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Monkey Puzzle Weybridge Ashburton House, 3 Monument Green, Weybridge, KT13 8QR

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 29 September 2016 22 July 2014

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Staff do not ensure risk assessments are consistently rigorous to identify all hazards to children, such as those associated with the wide open first-floor windows. However, as immediate action was taken to eliminate this hazard, there was no significant impact on children's safety. This is also a breach of the Childcare Register.  Staff assessments of some children's development are not precise enough to identify and plan for their next steps in learning, particularly to support progression with communication and language skills. Children's progress is not good enough.  Children's activities are not well focused to support their interests and developmental needs. For example, during the day, some staff do not recognise when children need outdoor activities and physical play.  Self-evaluation is not fully effective to recognise some weaknesses in staff practice.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children are happy and well behaved. They benefit positively from the kind ways staff care for them.  Staff share a wide range of information with parents to keep them informed about their children's learning and development.  Effective recruitment and vetting procedures ensure all staff are suitable to work with children. The provider understands her responsibilities to report significant issues to Ofsted.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 review risk assessments regularly to ensure hazards to children are promptly identified and minimised, in particular ensuring the first- floor windows are secure 27/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve staff's knowledge of how to accurately assess children's progress and use this information to help plan appropriate activities for what they need to learn next 27/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve staff's understanding of how to support and improve children's communication and language skills effectively. 27/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 provide more opportunities for children to have physical play and outdoor activities  strengthen the effectiveness of self-evaluation to ensure it targets the areas for improvement accurately and enhances outcomes for children.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector spent the majority of time observing the children in the nursery and in the garden.  The inspector sampled children's information and development records.  The inspector held discussions with the provider, manager and staff.  The inspector talked to one parent and read parental feedback comments to obtain their views about the nursery.  The inspector completed two joint observations with the manager.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Safeguarding is effective. The provider and all staff have recently completed safeguarding training. They are fully aware of the procedures to follow if a child is at risk of harm. Staff undertake daily checks of the environment to minimise any hazards. However, on occasions, safety checks are not robust enough to eliminate all risks to children. For example, at the inspection, some windows on the first floor where children play were open wide. This did not impact significantly on the children's safety, as the manager acted promptly to resolve this hazard raised by the inspector. The management team monitors staff performance to identify weaknesses in practice. It has recently developed a training programme to improve the whole team's knowledge. However, as this is in its infancy, it has not had an impact on raising the quality of teaching.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Staff set up the play rooms with a range of activities to encourage children to play and learn. Children gain skills in becoming independent; for example, they make free choices about their play. The young babies receive good support. For example, staff are attentive to their needs and provide some positive learning experiences to encourage their early development. However, the quality of teaching is not consistently strong. Staff make observations and assessments of children's development. However, they do not ensure these are accurate enough to plan for children's individual interests and do not notice when children are getting bored with activities. Staff interact with children and engage in discussions with them. However, they lack knowledge of how to support children whose communication and language is lower than expected.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

The key-person system is effective and this enables parents, children and staff to form close bonds. Staff have a caring approach. For example, they provide clear rules and expectations for behaviour and teach children to share and take turns. Children learn to be independent in their personal routines. Children learn some aspects about healthy lifestyles; for example, they benefit from nutritious meals. Older children confidently serve their own lunch and learn to think about how much food is enough to eat. However, staff do not plan sufficient time for children to be physically active outdoors.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children are generally motivated to learn and develop some skills in preparation for starting school. However, weaknesses in the teaching and assessment processes mean that children are not supported enough to make good progress, particularly with aspects of their communication and language skills.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY474097 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 1074111 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 76 Number of children on roll 77 Name of registered person Nikki's Nurseryies Ltd

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 22 July 2014 Telephone number 01932 988 400

p.4

reference number

Monkey Puzzle Day Nursery Weybridge registered in 2014 and is located in Weybridge, Surrey. It is open each weekday from 7am to 7pm for 51 weeks of the year. The nursery employs 22 staff, 18 of whom hold relevant childcare qualifications. The nursery receives nursery education funding for children aged three and four years.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion