Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder EY411985

Inspected 22 Sept 2016 · URN EY411985

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Sept 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Vickie Halliwell

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY411985

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−66Very criticalmore positive than 17% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivecaringrigorousenjoypositivelypositiveconsistentlytimely
Criticismpoorconcernsfailurenot alwaysweaknessesnot effectiveinadequatefailed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings571w−52
  • Leadership295w−90
  • What needs to improve317w−30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,162
longer than usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 33%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 31%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 22 September 2016 18 August 2014

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not monitor the quality of the provision. This has led to the significant decline in practice. Arrangements for induction, supervision and professional development for assistants are poor.  The childminder is not maintaining the required adult to child ratios. At times, she works with three assistants. This is more assistants working concurrently with a childminder than is permitted under the requirements for registration.  Children are routinely left in the care of assistants for more than two hours in any one day.  The childminder is unable to provide evidence of a current paediatric first-aid certificate.  The childminder has a poor knowledge of how to respond to child protection concerns or allegations of abuse. She has failed to provide adequate safeguarding advice and guidance to her assistants. This means they are unable to implement effective procedures in order to protect children.

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not have systems in place to demonstrate the ongoing suitability of the assistants.  The childminder is not recording information about each child's key person on a daily basis. This means it is not clear which assistant is caring for each child.  The progress check is not completed for all children aged between two and three years and parents are not provided with a written summary of their child's development.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children are provided with healthy meals and snacks.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that the adult-to-child ratios are met at all times, including when working with an assistant 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that children are not left in the sole charge of an assistant for more than two hours in any one day 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that records are easily accessible and available for inspection, with particular regard to the first-aid certificate 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 develop knowledge and understanding of safeguarding issues, in order to be able to respond in a timely and appropriate way to any child protection concerns, including in the event of an allegation being made against persons living or working on the premises 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 train all assistants so they understand the safeguarding policy and procedures and ensure that all assistants have up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 implement effective systems to ensure the suitability of assistants 14/10/2016  put in place appropriate arrangements for the supervision of staff, to provide support, coaching and training for assistants and promote the interests of children 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 ensure all assistants receive induction training to help them understand their roles and responsibilities 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

 maintain records to ensure the safe and effective management of the setting, with particular regard to recording the names of each child's key person on a daily basis. 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 complete the progress check for all children aged between two and three years and provide parents with a written summary of their child's development in the prime areas. 14/10/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 implement a rigorous process for self-evaluation that uses challenging criteria in order to identify and address areas of weaknesses and improve the quality of the provision.

p.2

Inspection activities

 We carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment.  The inspector observed interactions between the childminder's assistants and the children present.  The inspector spoke to the childminder, her three assistants and the children present at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector looked at children's records, including observations and planning, and a range of other documentation, including policies and procedures.  The inspector checked evidence of the suitability of adults living on the premises and the childminder's qualifications.  The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views.  The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities in the childminder's home and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The inspection was prioritised following concerns being raised about ratios, child supervision and staff deployment. The inspection found that the childminder regularly leaves assistants in sole charge of children for more than two hours in any one day. Assistants are also left to care for more children than ratios permit. At times, one assistant is left working with eight children in the early years age range for up to three hours. This compromises children's safety and welfare as required ratios are not met. Children are not adequately supervised and adult deployment is poor. In addition, the childminder is operating outside of her registration as a childminder by working with three assistants at the same time. The childminder does not have sufficient knowledge of how to respond to child protection concerns or allegations of abuse. Consequently, she is unable to provide adequate safeguarding advice and guidance

p.4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

to her assistants and induction arrangements are poor. This means they are also unable to implement effective procedures to help protect children from possible harm. The childminder does not have procedures in place to check the ongoing suitability of the assistants. Although the childminder states that she has recently completed first-aid training, her certificate is not accessible or available for inspection. Supervision is not effective and assistants do not take part in any professional development opportunities. As a result, not all assistants are aware of how to complete the progress check when children are aged between two and three years. The childminder does not keep a clear record of which assistant is responsible for particular children on any given day. The childminder's failure to monitor the quality of the provision results in the significant weaknesses in the leadership and management of the provision.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The childminder's practice relies heavily on the work of the assistants as she is not always present on the premises. On the day of the inspection the childminder was observed to have limited contact and direct engagement with children. Failure to maintain the minimum adult to child ratio has a negative impact on children as they do not receive enough support from the childminder. When ratios are maintained there is evidence of some appropriate teaching strategies from the assistants. The assistants interact and engage meaningfully, supporting and extending children's learning as they play. Children enjoy singing and rhyme sessions. Older children become absorbed in imaginative play that stems from their own interests as they create a dinosaur world. Planned activities are broadly matched to individual learning and development needs. Parents spoken to at the inspection comment positively on the activities provided and the progress their children

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

make. However, the progress check for all children aged between two and three years is not completed consistently by all assistants. Parents are not always provided with a written summary of their child's development in the prime areas.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The childminder's failure to operate within the bounds of her registration compromises children's safety and welfare. The assistants are not always able to meet children's care needs fully, particularly when the ratios are exceeded. Despite these issues, children have formed friendly relationships with the assistants and look to them for reassurance as they settle in their play. Children behave well, they develop positive attitudes to others and to learning that help them get ready for the move on to nursery or school. They have access to an outdoor area on a daily basis to help develop their physical skills. Information about children's care needs and routines is obtained prior to children starting at the setting.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children are not making sufficient progress due to the childminder not ensuring that adult to child ratios are consistently maintained. However, children are developing some of the key skills they need for school.

p.5

Setting details

Unique reference number EY411985 Local authority Salford Inspection number 1073210 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 11 Total number of places 18 Number of children on roll 15

p.6

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 18 August 2014

p.6

Telephone number

The childminder was registered in 2010 and lives in Eccles, Manchester. She operates all year round, from 7.30am to 6pm, Monday to Thursday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3 and employs three assistants. Of these one holds a qualification at level 3 and two hold a qualification at level 2.

p.6

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.7

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion