Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Children's home run by Lioncare Ltd Operating as The Lioncare Group in Epping Forest

Inspected 14 Sept 2016 · URN SC014235

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Collett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    14 Sept 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Stephen Collett

  • URN verified

    SC014235

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−77Very criticalmore positive than 3% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelysafeclearclearlyindependentdelay
Criticismat riskharmconcernpoorinadequateconcernsnot yetbreaches

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1565w−72
  • What needs to improve271w−81

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,836
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

This monitoring visit

A full inspection of the home took place on 20 July 2016. The home was judged to be inadequate. Five requirements and four recommendations were made in order to address the breaches of regulations and shortfalls in good practice. The date set for meeting the requirements was 9 September 2016. This monitoring inspection was undertaken to assess the progress that the home has made in meeting the requirements.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The following requirement was made under regulation 12, the protection of children standard:

p.2

This monitoring visit

In order to meet the protection of children standard, with specific reference to assessing whether children are at risk of harm, the management of allegations made against staff and subsequent response to children and maintenance of the premises, the registered person must ensure that:

p.2

This monitoring visit

(2)(a)(i) staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child (2)(a)(vi) staff take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare (2)(a)(vii) staff are familiar with, and act in accordance with, the home’s child protection policies (2)(b) the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm (2)(d) the premises used for the purposes of the home are designed, furnished and maintained so as to protect each child from avoidable hazards to the child’s health.

p.2

This monitoring visit

The registered manager has overseen some improvements to the standard of children’s individual risk assessments. The emphasis has been on risk assessing the potential for children to make allegations against staff. The registered manager has made efforts to consult placing authorities when assessing this risk. These risk assessments are of a good standard. They refer to the child’s background history and any significant events that may have taken place. These risk assessments identify likely triggers for a child to make an allegation, and they provide staff with clear guidelines on how to minimise the risk.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Other risk assessments still require improvement. For example, one child’s risk assessments in relation to being bullied, and the potential for him to speak to strangers, did not contain any detailed strategies that staff should employ to reduce the risk. They also lacked guidance on what staff should do if the risk becomes immediate.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Significant improvements have been made regarding the management of allegations. This includes the organisation’s policy being updated so that it clearly defines what action should be taken in the event of a child making an allegation. Since the inspection in July 2016, the designated person in the local authority has been consulted whenever allegations, or concerns about the conduct of a staff member, have been made. The advice given by the designated person has been followed, and internal investigations have been thorough. Effective action has been taken whenever there have been any associated concerns for a child’s safety.

p.2

This monitoring visit

Despite this overall improvement, some shortfalls were identified. In one case, clear evidence could not be found regarding the support given to a child after she had been mistreated by a member of staff. Managers referred to discussions that had been had with the child, but these were not recorded. There was no evidence that a one-to-one session with the child had taken place to address the inappropriate care she had received from the member of staff.

p.3

This monitoring visit

Effective action has been taken to rectify the poor state of the premises. There are no longer broken light fittings and exposed electrical wires. Holes in walls have been repaired, many of the rooms have been redecorated and some domestic appliances have been replaced. The children’s playroom, which was a particular cause for concern at the inspection in July, is no longer in use. Refurbishment work is still taking place in the home. In one room it was noted that a radiator guard was not securely fixed to the wall. This potential hazard was removed during the inspection.

p.3

This monitoring visit

The following requirement was made under regulation 13, the leadership and management standard:

p.3

This monitoring visit

In order to meet the leadership and management standard, with particular reference to monitoring the quality of care and disseminating information obtained through monitoring systems, the registered person must:

p.3

This monitoring visit

(2)(f) understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home (2)(h) use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home.

p.3

This monitoring visit

Leaders and managers have begun taking steps to ensure that the quality of care is more effectively monitored. Responsibility for completing monitoring reports has passed to the registered manager, who has day-to-day responsibility for ensuring that high standards are maintained. A new system of completing monthly monitoring reports is not yet embedded in practice.

p.3

This monitoring visit

The registered manager has taken a proactive approach to some aspects of monitoring the quality of care. She now holds monthly meetings with each child to obtain their views on how well they are being cared for. This resulted in four children asking for an independent advocate. However, at the time of this inspection, no action had been taken to meet these requests. The registered manager has also started keeping records of which staff are involved in incidents of physical restraint. She explained that this will enable her to look for common themes that may need to be addressed with individual staff members.

p.3

This monitoring visit

Leaders and managers have an increased awareness of the importance of monitoring the quality of care being delivered. The new measures that have been put in place are not yet fully effective. For example, monitoring undertaken by the registered manager has not identified that the standard of recording is often weak. This is evident in some records pertaining to the physical restraint of children.

p.4

This monitoring visit

The following requirement was made under regulation 20, restraint and deprivation of liberty:

p.4

This monitoring visit

Restraint in relation to a child must be necessary and proportionate (Regulation 20 (2)).

p.4

This monitoring visit

The poor standard of recording physical restraints often means that examination of documents fails to verify that restraint was necessary. One report records that a child was restrained when throwing books, because ‘he was creating too much damage’. It does not say what damage was being caused, or whether this was serious. Neither does it record whether any person was at risk of being injured as the books were being thrown. From the information recorded, it is not possible to conclude that the restraint was necessary or proportionate. In another report, the exact location of the restraint is not clear, and neither are the actions of the child immediately prior to restraint techniques being used.

p.4

This monitoring visit

The following requirement was made under regulation 23, medicines:

p.4

This monitoring visit

The registered person must make arrangements for the handling, recording, safekeeping, safe administration and disposal of medicines received into the children’s home. A record is kept of the administration of medicine to each child (Regulation 23 (1) and (2)(c)).

p.4

This monitoring visit

Since the full inspection in July 2016, all staff have undertaken online medication training. The content of the course is appropriate to the level of responsibility staff have for ensuring the safe recording and administration of prescribed medication to children.

p.4

This monitoring visit

The system for recording and administering medication has been updated. Records examined during the inspection were clear and up to date. They clearly record what medication a child has received, and the staff administering this. Records do not yet state the time that medication was administered, but the registered manager agreed that this amendment to records would be implemented without delay. A random stock check of medication was undertaken during the inspection, and this confirmed the accuracy of records. The following requirement was made under regulation 32, fitness of workers:

p.4

This monitoring visit

The registered person may only employ an individual to work at the children’s home if full and satisfactory information is available in relation to the individual in respect of each of the matters in schedule 2. Specifically, ensure satisfactory disclosure and barring service checks have been completed before an individual undertakes direct work with children (Regulation 32 (2)(a) and (3)(d)).

p.5

This monitoring visit

One new member of staff has commenced working in the home since July 2016. Documents relating to the recruitment of this member of staff were examined. They show that satisfactory checks, including an enhanced disclosure and barring service check, were undertaken before the member of staff began working in the home.

p.5

This monitoring visit

Notes were taken of the member of staff’s job interview, but these are brief, and unclear. They do not consistently identify which interview panel member is making an observation or judgement.

p.5

This monitoring visit

Overall, progress has been made against all the requirements made at the full inspection. However, work still needs to be undertaken in relation to the protection of children standard, the leadership and management standard and practice relating to the physical restraint of children. The timescale for meeting these requirements in full has therefore been extended. A common shortfall across all areas of practice is the standard of recording. This was evident in relation to the support given to a child after being mistreated, physical restraint records and recruitment interview notes. The registered manager should ensure that effective monitoring identifies where records fail to meet a sufficiently high standard, and take action to improve this aspect of practice.

p.5

Information about this children’s home

The home can accommodate up to seven children. The service accommodates children who have emotional and behavioural difficulties and provides a therapeutic care approach towards meeting their needs. The home is part of an organisation which has four residential homes and a school.

p.6

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person(s) meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.6

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the protection of children standard, with specific reference to assessing whether children are at risk of harm, the management of allegations made against staff and subsequent response to children, the registered person must ensure that:

p.6

Requirement Due date

(2)(a)(i) staff assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child (2)(a)(vi) staff take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare (2)(b) the home’s day-to-day care is arranged and delivered so as to keep each child safe and to protect each child effectively from harm. 17/10/2016

p.6

Requirement Due date

13: The leadership and management standard

p.6

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the leadership and management standard, with particular reference to monitoring the quality of care and disseminating information obtained through monitoring systems, the registered person must:

p.6

Requirement Due date

(2)(f) understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the 17/10/2016 quality of care provided in the home (2)(h) use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. Restraint in relation to a child must be necessary and proportionate (Regulation 20 (2)). 17/10/2016

p.6

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the home since its last Ofsted inspection. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for children looked after and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.9

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Information about this inspection

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion