Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Sept 2016
- Inspectorssingle source
Belita Scott
- Postcode verified
DL4 1HN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The local authority adviser linked to the school provides effective support and has an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas for development. p.3
- The headteacher has a very secure knowledge of the school’s strengths and areas for development and has led the actions taken to improve outcomes for pupils. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 940
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Lynn Boulton Timothy Hackworth Primary School Byerley Road Shildon County Durham DL4 1HN
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 14 September 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.
p.1
Primary School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School
work with parents to tackle pupils’ poor attendance with increased rigour improve pupils’ skills in reading in upper key stage 2 deploy teaching assistants more effectively in lessons.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior and middle leaders, the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school’s action plan was evaluated, together with a range of documents including minutes of meetings of the governing body and the local authority’s school scrutiny group. Information about pupils’ attendance and persistent absence was examined. You accompanied me on a learning walk through classes in the early years, key stage 1 and key stage 2.
p.1
Context
The vice-chair of the governing body resigned after the section 5 inspection and the role was taken on by an existing governor. Four teachers left the school at the end of the summer term. One teaching vacancy has not yet been filled by a substantive post-holder.
p.2
Main findings
The headteacher has a very secure knowledge of the school’s strengths and areas for development and has led the actions taken to improve outcomes for pupils. Middle leaders are playing an increasingly important role in school improvement. Their skills in evaluating the quality of teaching, learning and assessment are much improved since the section 5 inspection in November 2015.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s action plan clearly outlines the aspects of the school’s work which require further development and the milestones by which improvement will be measured. Leaders review progress fortnightly and make amendments to the plan when necessary.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are supportive of the headteacher, the staff and the pupils. Their skills are improving following attendance at training provided by the local authority. Governors are beginning to challenge the headteacher and senior leaders more robustly.
p.2
Main findings
School staff have worked in partnership with parents to improve the attendance of those pupils who were persistently absent. However, pupils’ attendance overall has failed to improve. In response, the school (in partnership with three other local primary schools) has employed its own educational welfare officer.
p.2
Main findings
A review of the school’s policy and procedures for teaching phonics has proved beneficial. Although standards have not yet reached national levels, the proportion of pupils who achieved the standard in the check of phonics skills in Year 1 increased by almost a third between 2015 and 2016. The policy and procedures for the teaching of reading have also been reviewed. Three quarters of children at the end of the early years reached the standard typical for their age this year, compared with half of children in 2015. Pupils are also making much better progress in reading in key stage 1 and lower key stage 2. Leaders have ambitious plans to work in close partnership with parents to enable the older pupils to develop age- appropriate reading skills more quickly so that they are ready for the demands of the key stage 3 curriculum on transfer to Year 7. The teaching of mathematics has a higher priority in school. Pupils confirm that they
p.2
Main findings
are given more opportunities to use their basic mathematical skills to solve real-life mathematical problems and carry out investigations. Pupils enjoy this work but understand that they need to know basic number facts thoroughly.
p.3
Main findings
Although the quality of teaching is much improved, there is still variability across the school. This is also true of the work of the school’s teaching assistant workforce. Some teaching assistants are not sufficiently involved in guiding pupils’ learning. There is a full training programme to develop the skills of both teachers and teaching assistants and the appraisal of performance is more embedded since the inspection.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders have acted on all of the recommendations made in the review of pupil premium spending which took place in March 2016. Disadvantaged pupils (those entitled to support through the government’s pupil premium funding) are making better progress and more are reaching the standards that are expected for their age.
p.3
External support
The local authority adviser linked to the school provides effective support and has an accurate view of the school’s strengths and areas for development. The subject leaders for English and mathematics are well supported by the local authority through the provision of training and joint activities to monitor the progress made by pupils in their subjects. The local authority has committed continued support and advice in response to some turbulence in the leadership of the early years. Regular meetings of the local authority’s school scrutiny group ensure that leaders are challenged rigorously.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Durham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion