Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Wasik, Monika
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Sept 2016
- Inspectors verified
Hayley Marshall-Gowen
- Early years verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY456039
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- put into place a programme of professional development to focus on improving the quality of assessments of children's learning and development 01/11/2016 p.2
- ensure that observations and assessments, including the progress check between the age of two and three years, are accurate and reflect children's abilities so that support can be gained when they do not meet expected progress in their development 28/10/2016 p.2
- ensure that planned next steps in learning are achievable and match children's stage of development so that suitable support can be offered 28/10/2016 p.2
- improve support for children who speak English as an additional language so that they can communicate and express themselves, as well as gain the skills they need to be ready for moving on in learning and, eventually, starting school. 28/10/2016 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language6
“They are slow to develop their understanding of the English language and ability to speak it.” p.3Safeguarding4
“Arrangements for safeguarding are effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 766
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 12 September 2016 4 June 2013
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder has not addressed the weaknesses raised at the previous inspection. She has not undertaken targeted training to improve her knowledge and skills. Self- evaluation does not suitably focus on the most important issues to bring about improvement. The childminder's observations and assessments of children's learning are not accurate. Children who do not meet expectations in their communication and language skills are not supported well. Next steps in learning are too ambitious for these children, meaning that they are unable to achieve them. The childminder does not ensure that children hear and use English in her care. Children speak in their home language continually even when the childminder speaks to them in English. This limits their ability to successfully communicate with others beyond the setting.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children enjoy playing outdoors and have opportunities to develop their physical skills. The childminder helps children to learn about leading healthy lifestyles and being fit and active. The childminder shares information about children's care with parents on a regular basis.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
put into place a programme of professional development to focus on improving the quality of assessments of children's learning and development 01/11/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that observations and assessments, including the progress check between the age of two and three years, are accurate and reflect children's abilities so that support can be gained when they do not meet expected progress in their development 28/10/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that planned next steps in learning are achievable and match children's stage of development so that suitable support can be offered 28/10/2016
p.2
Due Date
improve support for children who speak English as an additional language so that they can communicate and express themselves, as well as gain the skills they need to be ready for moving on in learning and, eventually, starting school. 28/10/2016
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector discussed a planned activity with the childminder. The inspector held discussions with the childminder and children at suitable times. She looked at relevant documentation, such as the childminder's self-evaluation and evidence of the suitability of the childminder, her assistant and household members. The inspector read and took account of the written feedback provided by parents.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Since her last inspection, the childminder has not taken action to address previous weaknesses. Consequently, the quality of some areas of her practice has declined further. The childminder knows about child protection issues and her responsibilities for keeping children safe. She has taken on board some advice from her local authority and enhanced her safeguarding knowledge through training and reading relevant information. Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Although the childminder has undertaken training to enhance some aspects of her work, she has not gained sufficient knowledge of how to effectively support children's learning using observations and assessments. The childminder reviews the work of her assistant. Together, they have discussed relevant issues, such as safeguarding and the documentation they use to help them to plan for children's learning.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Children do not have frequent opportunities to hear and use English as they play and learn. They are slow to develop their understanding of the English language and ability to speak it. Children use only their home language to communicate and initiate conversations with the childminder and each other. The childminder recognises when children's communication and language development do not meet expectations in either language. However, the assessments she makes are inaccurate. She is aware that children are working several developmental bands behind their actual age but her tracking of their progress does not reflect this. Furthermore, the progress check for children aged between two and three years does not identify this concern, in order to help parents to seek further support for children. Occasionally, the childminder's planned next steps in learning for children are not matched to their abilities, making them unachievable. As a result, despite
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
the interesting range of activities on offer, children do not make sufficient progress in their learning.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The childminder does not prepare children well for the next stage of their learning. Although they can communicate with her and their families, their ability to express themselves to others outside their immediate environments is limited. Children are settled. They follow a familiar routine that they know and understand. Children choose what snack they would like to eat from the two choices provided by the childminder. She encourages them to wash their hands in readiness for eating their food. The childminder is gentle and affectionate with children and they fall asleep soundly as she reads them a story.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children are not well prepared for starting school. Their inability to understand what is said to them and to communicate successfully in English have a negative impact on their learning. There is little sign of children closing the gaps in their learning as they approach school age. Children are generally confident as they play together. They behave well and seek the childminder out for support.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY456039 Local authority Luton Inspection number 1043112 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 3 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 7
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2012 and lives in Luton. She works with an assistant. The childminder operates all year round from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder supports a number of children who speak English as an additional language.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion