Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder EY296281

Inspected 14 Jul 2016 · URN EY296281

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Jan Linsdell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    14 Jul 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Jan Linsdell

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY296281

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 62% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoypositivestrongcaringsafeimprovedlovehappy
Criticismnot good enoughineffectiveunsafenot make good progressfailedpoorgapsweak

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings512w−36
  • Leadership132w−39
  • What needs to improve178w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
810
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
6
typical 7
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 40%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 14 July 2016 28 November 2013

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Previous inspection: Requires Improvement

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder has failed to notify Ofsted of changes to household members. Consequently, not everyone living on the premises is appropriately vetted to ensure their suitability. This compromises children's safety and welfare.  Security of the premises is poor. Keys to the front door are easily accessible to children, which exposes them to unnecessary risks.  Arrangements for safeguarding children are not good enough. Children are not fully protected because the childminder has gaps in her knowledge of relevant child protection policies and procedures.  Assessment and the monitoring of children's learning are ineffective. Consequently, children do not make good progress and parents do not receive good quality information about their child's development.  Systems for evaluating the setting as a whole are weak. This does not help the childminder to identify and address weaknesses in her practice.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder has a kind, gentle and caring approach, which enables children and parents to form close relationships with her. This contributes to supporting children's emotional well-being.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 provide Ofsted with the necessary information to enable them to carry out suitability checks on household members who have returned to live on the premises 29/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 attend child protection training to gain a thorough understanding of safeguarding practice, including the procedures for dealing with allegations against adults 29/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve the security of the premises to ensure children are not exposed to risks and they are kept safe at all times 29/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve knowledge of how to conduct the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years and ensure this is carried out when required 29/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

 improve systems for assessing and monitoring children's learning and provide parents with good quality information about their child's ongoing progress. 29/07/2016

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 improve ways to reflect on practice and develop knowledge and skills so that a good quality provision is continually maintained and improved.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the childminder.  The inspector looked at relevant documentation, such as the childminder's self- evaluation and evidence of the suitability of adults living on the premises.  The inspector took account of written feedback from parents.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. This significantly compromises children's safety, well-being and learning. The childminder did not inform Ofsted when both of her adult sons returned to live on the premises. This prevented Ofsted from updating necessary checks to ensure these household members continue to be suitable to be in contact with children. The childminder has not attended any training in child protection. Therefore, she does not have a secure understanding of all procedures to safeguard children, particularly how to manage allegations against adults. The childminder does not robustly check that the premises are secure, which exposes children to risks. Further, she does not rigorously reflect on her practice or seek professional development opportunities to increase her knowledge and skills. This makes it difficult for her to make and sustain improvements.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The childminder does not accurately assess children's skills on entry so that she can identify a clear starting point in their learning. Nor does she rigorously monitor their ongoing development. This makes it difficult to know exactly what progress children make over time. Further, the childminder does not carry out the progress check for children between the ages of two and three years. This is because she does not know what is expected of her. This does not support children to be ready for their next stage of learning. It also means that parents do not receive accurate information about their child's progress. The childminder demonstrates some sound teaching skills when she interacts with the children. For example, during baking activities, she helps children to develop a number of skills, such as counting and reading instructions. Children develop strong physical skills, for instance, as they throw balls and bounce on the trampoline.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The childminder does not do enough to promote children's safety and teach them about safe practices. As a result, children have the confidence to unlock the front door to strangers when the childminder is busy in the back garden. This places children at significant risk. The childminder clearly has positive relationships with the children. This is supported by comments from parents, for instance, when they say children love spending time with her. Children involve the childminder in their play and they enjoy her attention and support. The childminder promotes positive behaviour and places importance on teaching children about good manners. She keeps her first-aid training up to date so that she knows how to respond appropriately to children's accidents or injuries. Children follow good hygiene routines and they enjoy exercising in the garden, which contributes to their health.

p.3

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Outcomes for children are not good enough. Their safety is compromised due to some unsafe practices. They do not make good progress in their learning due to gaps in teaching. Despite this, children are happy at the setting and they enjoy close relationships with the childminder.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY296281 Local authority Cheshire West and Chester Inspection number 1043480 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 3 - 10 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 5

p.4

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 28 November 2013

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder was registered in 2004 and lives in Ellesmere Port. She operates all year round from 7.30am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion