Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Stoke-on-Trent City Council in Stoke-on-Trent

Inspected 19 Jul 2016 · published 8 Sept 2016 · URN SC381085

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

Matt Hedges

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Jul 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Matt Hedges

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Postcode verified

    ST4 1HH

  • URN verified

    SC381085

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRequires improvement

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 78% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositivelyrobusthighly effectiveclearpositiveimprovedhigh expectations
Criticismat riskfailedinadequatenot alwaysconcernharmnot yetpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

What needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
2,090
about usual (typical 1899)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

What needs to improve 83%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Requires improvement

The children’s home is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.2

The children’s home provision requires improvement because:

 Staff do not always take effective action when young people are at risk of harming themselves or when they go missing.  Not all staff are adequately trained.  Staff do not consistently follow the guidance outlined in young people’s risk assessments/plans.  Some features of the building are not adequate.  Some aspects of record-keeping are poor. Not all records are up to date.

p.3

The children’s home’s strengths

 Young people have good relationships with staff.  Young people make good progress in their education.  Managers are taking robust action to improve the service provided to young people.  Staff work collaboratively with parents and other agencies.

p.3

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person must comply within the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the protection of children standard, with particular reference to taking action and building design, the registered provider must ensure:

p.4

Requirement Due date

(2)(a)(vi) that staff take effective action whenever there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare

p.4

Requirement Due date

(d) that the premises used for the purposes of the home are designed, furnished and maintained so as to protect each child from avoidable hazards to the child’s health. 19/08/2016

p.4

Requirement Due date

13. The leadership and management standard

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the leadership and management standard, with particular reference to training, the registered person must:

p.4

Requirement Due date

(2)(c) ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child. 19/08/2016

p.4

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes the effectiveness and any consequences of the use of the measure. (Regulation 35(3)(a)(vii)) 19/08/2016

p.4

Requirement Due date

The registered person must maintain records (‘case records’) for each child which are kept up to date. (Regulation 36(1)(b)) 19/08/2016

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further, the service should take account of the following recommendations:  Ensure that a record of supervision is kept for staff, including the manager. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.3)  Ensure that staff understand the importance of careful, objective, clear recording. Information about the child must always be recorded in a way that will be helpful to the child. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 62, paragraph 14.4)

p.5

Information about this children’s home

The home provides care and accommodation for up to two children with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. A local authority operates the home. The home only supports young people from the local authority’s area.

p.6

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

p.6

Recent inspection history

11/03/2015 Interim Improved effectiveness

p.6

Require s improvement

Young people’s progress is variable. In some areas, young people make good steps forward. For example, young people’s attendance at school is very good, and improves in some cases due to individualised support from staff. A teacher talks positively about this, stating, ‘The young person’s attendance was 95% … We worked really closely with the staff at the home to ensure this … Staff are really supportive.’ This has a positive impact on young people’s academic progress. For example, one young person recently sat her exams at school despite some significant personal challenges.

p.7

Require s improvement

Staff ensure that young people have access to a range of positive activities. A teacher said, ‘They do loads … this helps to develop self-esteem’. A particular achievement includes young people completing the Race for Life with several staff.

p.7

Require s improvement

In contrast, a number of significant incidents have adversely affected young people’s progress in other areas. This is most notable in relation to their health and emotional well-being. All staff have strong relationships with young people. However, the response of staff on a small number of occasions has been inconsistent and they have failed to take effective action. This has affected young people’s experiences of living in the home. Escalating concerns about a young person’s safety meant that she had to leave the home, quickly. This reduced the ability of staff to prepare her. Despite this, the registered manager and staff team worked closely with her social worker to ensure the move was as supported as possible. This helped to reduce some of the young person’s anxieties.

p.7

Require s improvement

A new young person is due to move into the home. The registered manager has learned from previous shortfalls in this area. He has employed a more thorough and rigorous matching process. This process also ensures that all young people’s views are considered. These are now central to the planning. This has ensured that young people and staff are well prepared. A social worker confirms this, stating, ‘The admission was really well planned with a very in-depth risk assessment’.

p.7

Require s improvement

Staff seek young people’s opinions in a number of other areas, including how they would like to stay in touch with their friends and family. This ensures that young people stay in touch with the people most important to them, in a safe way. Judgement grade

p.7

Requires improvement

In the main, the registered manager is good at identifying and understanding the risks young people face, particularly in relation to self-harm. He seeks the views of young people, psychologists and the young people’s social workers about how best to manage these risks. This collaborative working produces clear guidelines for staff to follow. However, on a small number of occasions, staff have not adhered to or implemented these strategies and have failed to take effective action. For example, on one occasion staff waited several days to search a young person’s room, despite suspecting there were items in the room that the young person could use to harm herself. On another occasion, staff did not follow guidance when a young person blocked themselves in their bedroom, waiting longer than the agreed time before calling for assistance. These errors place young people at potential risk. In addition, the registered manager has not adequately assessed the

p.8

Requires improvement

design of the doors, or considered any changes to other areas of the building to reduce the likelihood of this incident reoccurring. As a result, this remains a potential hazard.

p.8

Requires improvement

Staff access a number of suitable training courses and develop a range of skills. However, some staff are yet to undertake formal training in supporting young people who self-harm. In addition, one member of staff has not completed specific training regarding how to use ligature cutters. These shortfalls affect staff confidence and skills, reducing the support they can provide to young people.

p.8

Requires improvement

Some young people continue to go missing. Staff understand the risks that this may pose, including the risk of exploitation. Despite this, the response at these times is variable. On some occasions, staff take robust action. The police talk positively about this, with one officer confirming, ‘They put all the strategies in place they need to and try everything they can’. In contrast, on one occasion, staff did not alert a manager, or their colleagues, to the fact that a young person was threatening to leave the home. As a result, staff were unable to follow her when she left. In another instance, staff did not report a young person missing in a timely way. The registered manager has also failed to ensure that one young person’s ‘absence protocol’ is up to date. This absence protocol states that staff should wait 30 minutes before reporting her missing. Other guidance correctly states that staff should report her missing immediately due to the level of concern.

p.8

Requires improvement

Although this has the potential to cause confusion for staff, on this occasion it was not the cause of the delay in reporting. These shortfalls affect the quality of the response young people receive when they leave the home and go missing.

p.8

Requires improvement

Staff generally respond well when young people display verbally or physically aggressive behaviour. A teacher confirmed this, stating, ‘Staff are really good at managing this… They do not sweep things under the carpet, they deal with everything, and put everything in place they need to in order to address the behaviours.’ Staff involve young people in discussions about their actions and the possible ‘consequences’ they may face. This ensures clear expectations and consistent boundaries. Young people feel more secure because of this. Staff record any measures implemented but do not always assess their effectiveness or the outcome of their use. This prevents staff from ascertaining whether they need to amend their approach.

p.8

Good

There have been several management changes over the last year. The current registered manager has been in post since February 2016. He is suitably qualified and experienced. He brings passion and commitment and he focuses firmly on the needs of the young people.

p.9

Good

The registered manager is well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the home. He has improved monitoring and audit processes and uses these tools to drive improvement. He has also met both of the shortfalls identified at the last inspection. This has helped to improve the consistency of staffing and the admissions process. This improves the quality of the service provided to young people and ensures the aims and objectives outlined in the statement of purpose are met.

p.9

Good

Senior managers in the organisation support the registered manager well. They ensure he receives high-quality supervision and provide additional quality assurance of the home. As a result, all managers now have a detailed understanding of the progress young people make. This also helps the registered manager to assess the development needs of the staff team.

p.9

Good

The registered manager has high expectations of staff and takes swift and robust action to address shortfalls in practice. This has resulted in a number of improvements. Staff talk positively about the changes he has made and the quality of the support they receive. This includes regular and effective supervision. However, the registered manager does not ensure that there is an adequate record of all of these sessions. This prevents him from being able to evidence the support he provides in a timely way.

p.9

Good

Planned improvements in other aspects of record keeping are yet to embed. Specifically, some entries by staff lack clarity or are crossed out/covered so they cannot be fully read. In addition, the language used by staff on some occasions is not easy for young people to understand. This may limit the usefulness of these records to young people; particularly should they wish to look back on this period in later life. The vast majority of staff are well qualified. They hold the level 3 diploma for residential childcare or a suitable equivalent. There are also clear plans in place to support a new member of the team to achieve this.

p.9

Good

The registered manager and staff have developed good working relationships with a range of partner agencies, including education, health, social care and the police. This ensures that young people receive access to the support and services they require. The registered manager actively challenges other professionals when he considers their response inadequate.

p.10

Good

Families talk positively about their relationships with the registered manager and staff team. One young person’s parent commented, ‘It’s good … People talk through things with her, she has a lot of support. They are also good at involving me and keeping me up to speed. They are really good.’ This has helped some young people to significantly improve their relationships with their families.

p.10

What the inspection judgements mean

The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’.

p.11

What the inspection judgements mean

An outstanding children’s home provides highly effective services that contribute to significantly improved outcomes for children and young people who need help and protection and care. Their progress exceeds expectations and is sustained over time. A good children’s home provides effective services that help, protect and care for children and young people and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted. In a children’s home that requires improvement , there are no widespread or serious failures that create or leave children being harmed or at risk of harm. The welfare of children looked after is safeguarded and promoted. Minimum requirements are in place. However, the children’s home is not yet delivering good protection, help and care for children and young people. A children’s home that is inadequate is providing services where there are widespread or serious failures that create or leave children and young people being

p.11

What the inspection judgements mean

harmed or at risk of harm or result in children looked after not having their welfare safeguarded and promoted.

p.11

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children’s home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference that adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s

p.12

Information about this inspection

Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.13

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.13

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.13

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion